increase the efficacy of the learning process on
students or professionals on pressure ulcer
evaluation, diagnosis and care or pharmacological
interventions. The development and validation of
this e-learning module will be concluded in a few
months. Finally, a remarkable issue to be considered
is the possibility of using this same technology
implemented in PULAB for the evaluation and
diagnosis of other sort of skin wounds that require a
teleassistance management similar to the one used
with pressure ulcers and implemented in PULAB.
That could be the case of burn wounds or even
different types of melanomas.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This project has been supported by the Consejería
de Salud, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, of the Junta de
Andalucía, project id. PI-0502/2009.
REFERENCES
EPUAP, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel., 1999.
Guidelines on treatment of pressure ulcers. EPUAP
Review, 1, 31-33.
Beeckman, D., Schoonhoven, L., Boucque, H., Van
Maele, G., & Defloor, T., 2008. Pressure ulcers: E-
learning to improve classification by nurses and
nursing students. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(13),
1697-1707.
Bolwell, C., 1993. Using computers as instructional
technology in the pressure ulcer field. Decubitus, 6(4),
20-25.
Bours, G. J., Halfens, R. J., Lubbers, M., & Haalboom, J.
R., 1999. The development of a national registration
form to measure the prevalence of malnutrition in the
netherlands. Ostomy Wound Manage, 45, 28-40.
Comaniciu, D., & Meer, P., 2002. Mean shift: A robust
approach toward feature space anaylsis. IEEE
Trans.Pattern Anal.Mach.Intell., 24, 603-619.
Edsberg, L. E., 2007. Pressure ulcer tissue histology: An
appraisal of current knowledge. Ostomy/wound
Management, 53(10), 40-49.
Gawlitta, D., Li, W., Oomens, C. W. J., Bader,Frank
P.T.Baaijens and Dan L., & Bouten, C. V. C., 2007.
The relative contributions of compression and hypoxia
to development of muscle tissue damage: An in vitro
study. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 35(2), 273-
284.
Gunningberg, L., 2004. Risk, prevalence and prevention of
pressure ulcers in three swedish. Journal of Wound
Care, 13(7), 286–-290.
Horn, S. D., Bender, S. A., Bergstrom, N., Cook, A. S.,
Ferguson, M. L., Rimmasch, H. L., et al., 2002.
Description of the national pressure ulcer long-term
care study. Journal of the American Geriatrics
Society, 50(11), 1816-1825.
Melotti, R. M., Fortuna, D., Chiari, P., & Cavicchioli, A.,
2003. Prevalence and prevention and treatment
modalities for pressure sores. Epidemiologia e
Prevenzione, 27(3), 141-146.
Tannen, A., Dassen, T., Bours, G., & Halfens, R., 2004. A
comparison of pressure ulcer prevalence: Concerted
data collection in the netherlands and germany.
International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(6), 607-
612.
Tsuji, S., Ichioka, S., Sekiya, N., & Nakatsuka, T., 2005.
Analysis of ischemia-reperfusion injury in a
microcirculatory model of pressure ulcers. Wound
Repair and Regeneration, 13(2), 209-215.
Veredas, F., Mesa, H., & Morente, L., 2010. Binary tissue
classification on wound images with neural networks
and bayesian classifiers. Medical Imaging, IEEE
Transactions on, 29(2), 410-427.
Woodbury, M. G., & Houghton, P. E., 2004. Prevalence of
pressure ulcers in canadian healthcare settings. Ostomy
Wound Management, 50(10), 22-38.
HEALTHINF 2011 - International Conference on Health Informatics
398