1st Lecture Section: Common to the four groups,
in which the fundamental concepts are explained.
Students have previous written information on them.
2nd Classroom practice: Here the problems
proposed and later solved by students are
commented and discussed, the class being given to
each group individually. The control groups have
two hours per week.
The experiment groups have 1 hour weekly of
problems and 2 hours every two weeks of laboratory
simulation. On average, they receive the same
number on hours, the difference is that the
experimental groups solve the problems with the
simulation software and the control groups don’t use
the virtual programm. The students are provided
with a program-guide, in which the process to follow
is indicated, as well as the problems to be solved
through a Simulation. All the questions they may
have are resolved by the lecturer giving the
simulation laboratory practice.
The students in the control groups are given the
same practical cases as the experiment group ones,
and they can solve them in small groups in the
practice class under the supervision of the lecturer in
charge of it.
After working with the software, the students
from the experiment groups did the same practice
works as the control group students. On finalizing
this process, each student gives in a written report in
which they show and analyze the results obtained,
reach conclusions, and answer diverse questions
related to their interpretation of the proposed
problems.
To carry out the study made with the control and
experimental groups, a set of questions and exercises
that students must resolve individually completes the
instruction. These exercises are practical problems
that require the revision of prior theoretical
information.
The time devoted to the study of these themes
was similar in all the groups since the experiment
group students substituted 1 hour of Classroom
practice for the Laboratory Simulation. The
experiment groups had the advantage of, when
carrying out the practice exercise, being able to
consult at any moment any question they had on the
theory since, in each simulation screen, there was a
link to the theme in the tutorial related to that
specific simulation. Other advantages shown in
using the software are the ability to rapidly repeat an
experiment simulation however many times it is
required and the possibility of receiving a diagnosis
on the level of learning at each moment by accessing
to the Tutorial questionnaire.
C. Evaluation of the experiment
In order to make an evaluation of the development
of this educational experiment, i.e., to study the
degree of satisfaction in the achievements of the
educational objectives proposed, an evaluation was
made of the learning acquired by each of the
students of control groups GC1 and GC2 and of
those in the experiment groups GE1 and GE2,
account being taken of the following aspects:
a) The quality of the work reports drafted by
students at the end of the virtual laboratories
(Experiment Groups) and the work presented by
control group students concerning the practical
cases resolved in the practice classes (between 0
and 10 points).
b) The results of a set of questions and exercises
that students had to resolve individually
(between 0 and 10 points).
c) The results of a written test made up of several
questions, in which students had to demonstrate
that they can relate the theoretical-practical
aspects involved in the study (between 0 and 10
points: 1 point/1 true question, 0 point/ no
answered question and (-1)/ wrong question ).
d) The results of an exam in which a practical
problem was proposed (between 0 and 10
points).
5 ANALISYS OF RESULTS
For the study of the evaluation results for each of the
objectives, the partial marks assigned to the students
in the different groups is taken and, for each one,
four categories or levels of learning were established
according to the following classification: category I
corresponded to very low marks (deficient learning:
between 0-5 points), category II to average marks
(fair or semi-acceptable learning: between 6-7
points), category III to high marks (good learning
level: between 8-9 points) and category IV
corresponded to very high marks (very good
learning level between 9-10 points).
Figure 3 shows the results obtained by the
students in the control groups GC1 and GC2,
corresponding to the evaluation of the three
objectives (1
st
, 2
nd
, and 3
rd
), allocated to categories
(I, II, III and IV). The relative frequencies or
percentages corresponding to each of the four levels
established for each objective and group are shown
in columns, those on the left being for group GC1
and on the right those for group GC2. It can be seen
that the results obtained by both groups are fairly
similar. On comparing the results from GC1 and
GC2 in each of the three objectives, it was observed
CSEDU 2011 - 3rd International Conference on Computer Supported Education
234