data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94b27/94b2748e1cd4c8b29fe36b0375454a3501107063" alt=""
The probe is widely characterized on a test bench
system, capable of reproducing important features of
the cardiovascular system (Pereira et al, 2010).
2 MATERIALS
2.1 The Double Headed Probe
The configuration of the developed double headed
probe (DP) is shown, in figure 1. The DP consists of
two circular-shaped PZ sensors (MURATA® 7BB-
12-9 Sounder, 12mm diameter), placed 23 mm apart
and mounted on a triple double layer printed circuit
board (PCB). The first and second PCB layers
support the PZ discs, assuring the PZs oscillations
due to their perforation and the third one
incorporates the local signal conditioning electronics
which is based on a voltage follower amplifier, set to
a gain of ≈ 2, for each PZ. The probe’s mechanical
interface consists of two mushroom-shaped PVC
pieces (15 mm diameter in top), located in the centre
of the PZ discs. These elements are responsible for
transmitting the distension imparted to tissues by the
pressure waveform, to each PZ sensor.
Figure 1: Cross section scheme of the double headed PZ
probe. A, B - support layers; C- signal conditioning layer;
D- ‘mushroom’ PVC interface E - PZ metal disk; F- PZ
material G – PZ signal conductor H – ground conductor I
– coaxial cable 1- PZ
1
;
2- PZ
2
.
2.2 The Test Bench System
For testing the probe, it was developed a dedicated
test bench, diagrammatically shown in figure 2.
A pressure wave is generated by a piston
mechanism coupled to a 0.7 mm stroke actuator,
ACT, driven by a high voltage linear amplifier, HV,
(Physik Instrumente GmbH P-287 and E-508,
respectively) and launched into an 8mm internal
diameter, 0.5 mm wall thickness silicone rubber
tube, filled with water. The wave is then captured by
the DP placed along the tube and by two pressure
sensors PS1 and PS2 (Honeywell, 40PC015G1A),
placed at the tube’s extremities. The acquired signals
are sampled at 12.5 ksps, through NI DAQ USB-
6210, and stored for offline analysis using Matlab®.
The input waveforms are programmed into an
Agilent 33220A arbitrary waveform generator, WG
and the DC level is controlled by a piston–mass
combination, P-m, placed at the extremity of the
tube, on the opposite side of the ACT ((Pereira et al,
2009).
∆x
WG
NI USB6210HV
P
m
PS2
PS1
ACT
Workstation
200 cm4.5 cm
1.5 cm
3.6 cm
3.7 cm
DP1 DP2
PZa
PZb
Figure 2: Schematic drawing of the test bench system.
3 METHODS
3.1 Double Probe Characterization
3.1.1 Impulse Response Determination
The electrical equivalent of a PZ sensor is more
complex than a simple RC circuit, mainly if the
sensor is attached to another mechanical structure.
The first experiment carried out for DP
characterization, consisted in determining the
impulse response (IR) for each one of its sensing
elements (i.e., mushroom probe plus PZ sensor
electronics). To achieve this purpose, a technique
based on a chirp signal that sweeps linearly a wide
frequencies range (from 500 mHz to 1 kHz) was
used. This sweep was generated by the WG and fed
to the ACT, with direct actuation on the probe’s
interface. The spectra of the PZ output and of the
sweep input signal were computed, and the
correspondent transfer function was inferred.
Through the inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT), it
was possible to determine the referred IR.
Test bench acquisitions were accomplished in
order to apply the deconvolution principle to the DP
output, and thus determine the effectiveness of the
determined IRs.
3.1.2 Time Resolution Assessment
The main potential of the DP is focused on the
ability to locally measure the PWV, with enough
accuracy to be considered a valid device for clinical
use. In order to assess DP time resolution
performance, two main studies were carried out. The
DOUBLE HEADED PROBE FOR LOCAL PULSE WAVE VELOCITY ESTIMATION - A New Device for
Hemodynamic Parameters Assessment
445