
society demands have required the implementation 
of several measures that seek to improve 
undergraduate degrees. For example, the Bologna 
Protocol, signed on June 19, 1999 by 29 countries of 
the European Union (EADTU, 2007). One of its 
objectives is to develop a quality assurance process 
that somehow ensures a qualification and 
performance standard for undergraduate and 
graduate degrees in all signatory countries. 
Nevertheless, the issues at the core of the debate 
about quality in Higher Education, according to 
Santana (2007), are discussed under two 
perspectives: the critical viewpoint, which reflects 
on social inclusion and human development; and the 
instrumental viewpoint. The author affirms that “the 
instrumental vision makes education a business 
comparable to any other commercial enterprise. But 
the critical vision is concerned with understanding 
quality as having a social function to be fulfilled” 
(Santana, 2007, p. 61). In other words, in the 
instrumental perspective, quality in education is 
geared towards processes and results, while in the 
critical vision it refers to the social relevance and the 
pertinence of the formation. This distinction affects 
the evaluation that the educational programs are 
subjected to. 
This research focuses on undergraduate 
programs offered in the Distance Learning (EAD) 
modality. This is justified because the programs in 
this modality have been presented as a quality 
alternative to a higher education degree for a large 
number of individuals seeking both insertion in the 
labor market and improvement of their initial 
formation.  
In the last 6 years, there has been a 1,980% 
increase in the number of enrollments in distance 
learning undergraduate degrees in Brazil (INEP, 
2008), while for presential programs this percentage 
was only 25%. This fast growth in EAD leads us to 
inquire about the way in which the quality 
assessment procedures in these courses have been 
implemented and whether these programs promote 
innovations noticeable to the students and that result 
in a transformation in their professional life. 
In order to guide and regulate an EAD program 
in Brazil, a document has been developed, titled 
“Quality Referentials for Distance Higher Education 
Learning” (MEC, 2007). These referentials outline 
the guidelines for certification, offer and follow-up 
of distance learning courses, and are based on the 
following assumptions: there is no single distance 
learning model; the best technology and 
methodology depend on the nature of the course and 
the target audience. 
3 FORMATION CONSISTENCY 
The Brazilian Government has invested massively in 
the distance learning modality. From 2008 to 2010, 
there has been a 78% increase in the number of 
undergraduate programs offered by public 
institutions in this modality. Current higher 
education distance learning programs in Brazil 
include, primarily, the Pro-Licentiate I and Pro-
Licentiate II programs, which began in 2005, in 
addition to the programs linked to the Brazilian 
Open University System (UAB), which began in 
2006. One of the objectives of the UAB System is to 
offer, through the use of information and 
communication technologies (ICTs), higher 
education to a large number of teachers of the public 
school system. 
Gatti and Barreto (2009) raise a few issues with 
regards to governmental programs oriented to 
teachers formation, more specifically, the licentiate 
programs offered through EAD. Among the issues 
raised, they mention the accelerated and 
disorganized growth of program offers in this 
modality, considered by the authors as an attempt to 
establish a system that reverts the situation of 
inequality in access to higher education in Brazil. It 
is evidenced by the multiplication of consortiums, 
presential facilities, and offer of courses without a 
consistent political and pedagogic project for teacher 
formation.  
 
In practice, one verifies that the evaluation of 
these programs emphasizes the infrastructure, i.e., 
classroom conditions, libraries, laboratories, and 
technological resources; faculty; technical 
qualification of human resources, for example, 
librarians and technicians; management, which 
includes coordination of the facilities, the pedagogic 
project, the geographic location, and others. 
However if the government proposal is to develop a 
policy to improve education and to reduce social 
inequalities, besides the infrastructure we must 
concern ourselves with the issue of formation 
consistency of graduates. This, in our view, relates 
to two factors: a) Reliability of the higher education 
institution (IES) and the program offered, which is 
related to the ability of the IES to provide a service 
in a correct, safe and careful manner, and b) the 
applicability of acquired knowledge, considered as 
the possibility of applying it to the student’s social 
and professional life. 
Each of these factors, in turn, is verified through 
different analysis dimensions, as shown in Figure 1. 
So, in addition to the infrastructure, which 
certainly  is fundamental for  the good development 
CSEDU 2011 - 3rd International Conference on Computer Supported Education
294