![](bg9.png)
7. Thorne, B. C., et al., Agent-based modeling of multicell morphogenic processes during
development. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today, 2007. 81(4): p. 344-53.
8. Walker, D., et al., Modeling the effect of exogenous calcium on keratinocyte and HaCat
cell proliferation and differentiation using an agent-based computational paradigm. Tissue
Eng, 2006. 12(8): p. 2301-9.
9. An, G., Concepts for developing a collaborative in silico model of the acute inflammatory
response using agent-based modeling. J Crit Care, 2006. 21(1): p. 105-10; discussion 110-
1.
10. Pertoldi, C. and C. Topping, Impact assessment predicted by means of genetic agent-based
modeling. Crit Rev Toxicol, 2004. 34(6): p. 487-98.
11. Walker, D. C., et al., Agent-based computational modeling of wounded epithelial cell
monolayers. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience, 2004. 3(3): p. 153-63.
12. Henrickson, L. and B. McKelvey, Foundations of "new" social science: institutional
legitimacy from philosophy, complexity science, postmodernism, and agent-based
modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2002. 99 Suppl 3: p. 7288-95.
13. Lewenstein, M., A. Nowak, and B. Latane, Statistical mechanics of social impact. Phys
Rev A, 1992. 45(2): p. 763-776.
14. Latane, B., Am. Psychol., 1981(36): p. 343.
15. Nowak, A., J. Szamrej, and B. Latane, Psychol. Rev., 1990(97): p. 362.
16. Kohring, G. A., Ising models of social impact: The role of cumulative advantage. Journal
De Physique I, 1996. 6(2): p. 301-308.
17. Kohring, G. A., J. Phys. I France, 1996(6): p. 301-308.
18. Plewczynski, D., Landau theory of social clustering. Physica A, 1998. 261(3-4): p. 608-
617.
19. Plewczynski, D., Mean-field theory of meta-learning. Journal of Statistical Mechanics-
Theory and Experiment, 2009: p. -.
20. Holyst, J. A., K. Kacperski, and F. Schweitzer, Phase transitions in social impact models of
opinion formation. Physica A, 2000. 285(1-2): p. 199-210.
21. Kacperski, K. and J. A. Holyst, Phase transitions and hysteresis in a cellular automata-
based model of opinion formation. Journal of Statistical Physics, 1996. 84(1-2): p. 169-189.
22. Kacperski, K. and J. A. Holyst, Opinion formation model with strong leader and external
impact: a mean field approach. Physica A, 1999. 269(2-4): p. 511-526.
23. Kacperski, K. and J. A. Holyst, Phase transitions as a persistent feature of groups with
leaders in models of opinion formation. Physica A, 2000. 287(3-4): p. 631-643.
24. Conte, R., Agent-based modeling for understanding social intelligence. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A, 2002. 99 Suppl 3: p. 7189-90.
25. Liu, J., W. Zhong, and L. Jiao, A multiagent evolutionary algorithm for constraint
satisfaction problems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern, 2006. 36(1): p. 54-73.
26. Pedrycz, W. and P. Rai, A multifaceted perspective at data analysis: a study in
collaborative intelligent agents. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern, 2008. 38(4): p.
1062-72.
27. Pedrycz, W. and P. Rai, A multifaceted perspective at data analysis: a study in
collaborative intelligent agents. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern, 2009. 39(4): p.
834-44.
28. Rocha, A. F., The brain as a symbol-processing machine. Prog Neurobiol, 1997. 53(2): p.
121-98.
36