practical approach with following seven major
components involved: motivation, governance,
modeling & architecture definition, tool
administration, library management, stakeholder
management and training. Such a framework with
detailed sub components shall help enterprises to
approach enterprise process modeling as a service in
a structured manner. A Delphi study on the current
issues and future challenges of process modeling list
the following as overall top 10 process modeling
challenges: value of process modeling, model-driven
process execution, standardization, business-IT
alignment, service orientation, training, model
management, buy-in, ease of use and collaborative
modeling. The authors also list few areas like value
of process modeling, expectations management,
training, process architecture and adoption as areas
of interest to practitioners but do not appear as yet
on the radar screen of BPM scholars (Marta, 2009).
From this we can infer that a practitioner viewpoint
for process modeling along with a framework shall
be useful to address such issues in large scale
process modeling. A formal framework is presented
for enterprise and business process modeling with
four major components namely, objectives and
goals, roles and actors, actions and processes and
responsibilities and constraints that allow business
analysts to capture enterprise knowledge in a way
that is both intuitive and mathematically formal
(Koubarakis et al, 2002). An attempt to provide an
integrated framework for enterprise process
modeling suggesting that enterprise process
modeling is the most important element in the
design of next-generation ERP systems. The authors
also list four needs that support the case for an
integrated process modeling framework namely,
need for a theory base, need for modeling and
implementing distributed computing, need for new
process redesign semantics and need to link business
and engineering processes (Nikunj et al, 2004). An
exhaustive review of business process modeling
techniques reported in literature and a framework for
classifying business process modelling techniques
according to their purpose is detailed. The author
classifies around 12 process modeling techniques
and provides a framework which lists the strength
and weakness of these techniques from user
perspective and modeller perspective (Ruth Sara,
2003). Process modeling is a powerful tool in
enterprise management and leads to effective
knowledge management. The authors go on to list a
reference model for new product development and
concludes with some general guidelines for detailing
level of granularity of business process models, use
of formal modeling techniques, use of reference
models and use of distribution techniques for
business process models (Brane & Peter, 2002). A
framework for selecting business process modeling
methods based on modeling objectives is presented
which can serve as the basis for evaluating modeling
methods and generating selection procedures
(Wenhong et al, 1999). Michael Rosemann, includes
“process management” as one of the
transformational services that a chief services officer
has to manage as part of “service-oriented
enterprise” (SOE) which is similar to service-
oriented architecture (SOA) that drives redesign of
IT landscapes (Rosemann, 2010). In another
BPTrends article, Michael Rosemann communicate
that managers newly in charge of the setup and
delivery of the enterprise-wide BPM capabilities in
an organization often struggle with the identification
of the activities as being part of their role. The
author lists a set of 15 distinct BPM services out of
which process modeling is one major service.
Process modeling as a service includes ownership of
the BPM methodology as well as related services
including training in the adopted methodology,
development of procedural models, methodological
upgrades, and the provision of conventions and
advanced practices. The author communicate that
process modeling is often the bread-and-butter
service of a BPM group, and it will demand
substantial scalability and expertise. It is interesting
to note that strategic alignment and library
management of business processes are part of this 15
services listed (Rosemann, 2008). Zhiqiang Yan et
al, stating that large organizations often run
hundreds or even thousands of business processes
and managing such large collections of business
processes is a challenging task, present a framework
consisting of a management model and a reference
architecture that assist in managing large collections
of business process models. Also based on a survey,
the authors conclude that the field of business
process model repositories is an important and active
field in research and practice, but that complete
repositories are not yet available and that existing
repositories focus on traditional functionality rather
than exploiting full potential of information
management tools (Zhiqiang et al, 2009). A
framework for classifying business process
modeling techniques so as to increase BPR projects
success rate is reported and business process
modeling techniques are classified according to
three dimensions namely, level of change, modeling
perspective and modeling purpose (Leila et al,
2007).
COMPOSITE ENTERPRISE PROCESS MODELING (CEPROM) FRAMEWORK - Setting Up a Process Modeling
Center of Excellence using CEProM Framework
379