application. The last part is a conclusion about the
text.
2 RELATED THEORIES
2.1 Customer Value
“Marketing Management” (Philip Kotler, 2002),
authored by Kotler, says that customer value
generally refers to the total value which customers
get from products or services. This includes the
product value, service value, personal values, image
value, etc. The concept is to measure the value
customers received, but for customers, they must
spend a considerable cost in order to obtain the value
generated by these products and services. It can be
named customer cost. The value customers really
obtain is the value customers get minus that they
spend. But for ordinary enterprises, the so-called
customer value refers to the customers’ importance
for enterprise. It can be simply understood as a kind
of ability that customers bring profits for enterprise.
Now customer cost refers to what enterprise spent to
obtain some clients. If the customer cost is higher
than the customer value, it means that what
enterprise spends for the customer is more than what
the customer brings. Then the client will be
abandoned gradually.
Judging valuable customers and cultivating
valuable customer is the two basic tasks of
enterprise CRM and two basic methods to keep
customers’ loyalty (
Mingliang Chen, 2006). Fierce
tourist market competition forces enterprise to put
more and more attention to the demands of the
customer. More and more enterprises realize the
importance of customer relationship management.
They spend a lot of resources in this field. However,
enterprises’ resources are limited. How to use
limited resources to maximize benefits becomes the
focus of enterprises’ attention. This is just why
customer value identification is so important.
2.2 RFM Analysis
RFM analysis (Xiaoyu Zhao, 2005) is the
comprehensive analysis about recency, frequency
and monetary value. It is an important method used
in judging customer value. The use of RFM analysis
method can enable enterprises to pay more attention
to high-value customers, and thus get the most profit
through the best use of limited resources.
The basis of RFM analysis is three key indicators
about customer behavior. Bult and Wansbeek give a
definition of these three indicators as follows (
Bult
J R, 1995
).
(1) R (recency) refers to the interval from the last
purchase to the current time. Customers who
patronize your hotel recently are more likely to
come again than those who came a few months or
even a few years ago.
(2) F (frequency) refers to the number of
purchase times in a certain period. Customers who
patronize your hotel frequently are more likely to
come again than those who come rarely.
(3) M (monetary value) refers to the total
consumption of customer in a certain period.
Customers who spend plenty of money in your hotel
are more likely to come again than those who spend
a little.
These three indicators can be nearly applied to
all products, no matter whether the product is
tangible or intangible (such as hotel services). Also
they can be applied to different business models:
B2B model (such as hotel products supply) and B2C
models (such as retail trade and service industry).
Just because of these three principle’s universal
applicability and their ability to respond customer
behavior, they can be used in enterprise marketing
and management. And it will be more convenient to
judge the customer value than other methods.
3 TOURIST HOTEL CUSTOMER
VALUE JUDGMENT
As is mentioned above, RFM analysis is a very
important analysis method for customer response.
Combining RFM analysis with statistical method to
judge customer value is more convenient than
existing methods in practical application especially
when we do not need the results are fairly accurate.
Now we introduce how managers conduct customer
value judgment using statistical method based on
RFM analysis through a case study of tourist hotel.
3.1 Indicator of Judging Customer
Value by RFM Analysis
Recency indicator: The list of customers will be
arranged according to the time of patronage. The
customer who has patronized the tourist hotel most
nearly is ranked first; on the contrary, the one who
ICEIS 2011 - 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
166