Vision) and 3D quality in the future. Finally, online
back-up and content management systems could
create added value to the end-user. By using cloud
computing, media files created by the user can be
safeguarded online instead of stored on a local space
(requiring tens of gigabytes). As delay is less
important for this service, network bandwidth is an
important bottleneck. Unlike other applications, the
bandwidth use of this application is less continuous,
but occurs in burst in sync with the user’s activity.
For example, after shooting, a photographer wants to
upload 400 high-quality photos (about 2 Gb). At an
upload speed of 5 Mbps, it takes close to one hour
while it takes about ten minutes at a speed of 25
Mbps. As the user wants to browse his pictures after
uploading, it takes two seconds to load each photo,
which feels very slow and unresponsive. To reach a
response time lower than half a second, a download
speed of 100 Mbps is required, and bandwidths of
500 Mbps or above can give the user an
instantaneous feeling of the application for viewing
his photographs.
2.3 Existing vs. Next-gen Solutions
The first mentioned discussion on fibre deployment
could lead to the conclusion that existing network
infrastructure should suffice to deliver some of the
aforementioned services to end-users with a more or
less optimal QoS and QoE. However, this discussion
on bandwidth-intensive applications and the related
technical requirements may be quite artificial. In real
life, these applications will be used simultaneously
within a family context. Assume a family household
of four members where the father watches a
particular television channel on the regular screen
(while recording another one via the set-top box),
and the son is viewing a football game via his tablet-
pc. At the same time, the daughter is safeguarding
her pictures online while the mother is making a
video call with her sister living abroad. In this
imaginary case, a download bit rate of over 50 Mbps
is required (100+ is recommended) whereas the
upload speed would have to be 17.5 Mbps (30+ is
recommended) to guarantee an optimal QoS and
QoE. Not to mention that some of these applications
are sensitive to delay and jitter, which the users will
experience in case the network is working at (close
to) full capacity.
As delay and jitter in the network are not only
determined by the access technology, but also by
several elements in the network infrastructure, they
have not been quantified within this study. Still,
every buffer that has a faster connection (i.e. fibre)
can contribute to a lower delay. Similarly, jitter is
only expected to increase by fibre solutions when
the newly provided applications seem so popular
that the relative load on the network is increased
significantly. Hence, the rest of this section will
focus on bandwidth.
There is currently no large-scale fibre to the
home network deployed in the Belgian market. The
major players that dominate the market (Belgacom
and Telenet) are experimenting with FTTH pilots,
but no roll-out is planned to date. Regarding
bandwidth, Table 3 – showing a typical and high-
end service – indicates that the existing
infrastructure in Belgium (as well as in many other
countries) may prove insufficient to deliver the
services discussed in this paper. It should be noted
that in the Telenet case video is broadcast in a
separate RF-channel not impacting downstream or
upstream traffic. Additionally, it is necessary to note
that the up- and downstream bandwidth is shared
amongst all customers of the same coax line. In the
Belgacom case, the bandwidth is dedicated per
customer, but is used for both internet and video.
Table 3: Bandwidth of Belgian ISPs (bandwidth capacity
in Mbps, prices in Euros).
Telenet (cable) Belgacom (xDSL)
Normal High Normal High
Down 15 100 12 30
Up 1 5 1.5 4.5
Price 30 99 33 58
The overview shows that the upgraded network
infrastructure (DOCSIS 3.0 and VDSL for Telenet
and Belgacom respectively) hardly guarantees the
optimal QoS and QoE for high-bandwidth services.
While the download speed of the high-end solution
of Telenet could suffice, the upload speed – just like
the other solutions – fails to meet future bandwidth
requirements. Since end-users attach great value to
file-sharing and user-generated content, applications
increasingly require symmetrical bandwidth (Cave
& Martin, 2010). It should be mentioned that these
offers are theoretical values. Telenet states on its
website that measurements indicate that realistic
speeds of both Telenet and Belgacom connections
are about 75 percent of the bandwidths officially
indicated. The lack of fibre to the home solutions in
Belgium heavily contrasts with the 100 Mbps
solutions offered in several other countries and parts
of the world (in terms of penetration, Asia is the
undisputable forerunner in deploying FTTH
services) (see IDATE, 2010). The Belgian demand
for, and large-scale roll-out of fibre to the home
remains to date mere speculation. This is perhaps not
VALUE-ADDED SERVICES FOR FIBRE TO THE HOME - Market Potential, Time Horizons and User Groups
9