Table 23: Topics of the Systematic Review KA.
Topics Area% Total%
Challenges and solutions in GSE;
Critical barriers in GSE;
25.0 0.3
Process models; Tools;
Development patterns and
practices; Aspects of
communication; Success factors;
Agile methodologies.
12.5 0.2
4 DISCUSSION
The studies that discuss GSE are focused mainly on
the following KAs: Software Engineering Processes
(14%), Methods and Tools of SE (11%), Project
Communications Management (8%) and Project
Human Resource Management (6%). The high
percentage of studies in these KAs was not a
surprise, because GSE to be successful is very
dependent on these KAs.
The Project Procurement Management and
Project Cost Management KAs, both from PMBOK,
did not have identified studies. Other KAs, such as
Time Management had less than 10 studies each.
The Software Engineering Processes, Methods
and Tools of Software Engineering and Design
software KAs from SWEBOK correspond together
to 27.1% of studies in GSE. These areas obtained a
higher percentage of studies, in comparison to KAs
of the PMBOK. This result indicates that most
challenges of GSE might be concentrated in these
KAs.
Based on this SLR we found studies for most
Software Engineering KAs, but still there are topics
not explored, and this might be an opportunity. We
also identified new topics, classified in the General
Area KA. These new topics indicate that there are
several research opportunities in the GSE field, with
several interesting topics to be explored, as the area
evolve.
5 CONCLUSIONS
GSE is increasing and it is essential for
organizations that wish to be in the software
development market. Several organizations are
doing GSE, and research in this field is essential to
the growth of GSE as an area of research.
The existing studies are distributed over almost
all SE KAs. Most of the studies found are
concentrated in KAs that are the basis of GSE, such
as Software Engineering Processes, Methods and
Tools, Project Communications Management and
Project Human Resource Management.
The analysis of KAs’ study topics reveals that
the GSE is an immature research field and that there
are still many research opportunities. This way, we
believe that the development of this work
contributed to the identification of emerging
research areas and topics, along with research
opportunities. In order to continue this work, this
SLR may be expanded to reach other digital
libraries. New studies can help identifying new
research topics and additional study areas.
REFERENCES
Abran A., Moore J. W. et al., 2004. Guide to the Software
Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK®), IEEE
Computer Society 2004 Guide.
Ebling T., Audy, J. L. N., Prikladnicki, R., 2009. A
Systematic Literature Review of Requirements
Engineering in Distributed Software Development
Environments. ICEIS (3) 2009, 363-366.
Jiménez, M., Piattini, M., Vizcaíno, A., 2009. Challenges
and improvements in distributed software
development: A systematic review. Advances in
Software Engineering.
Kitchenham, B., 2004. Procedures for Performing
Systematic Reviews. Joint Technical Report SE0401
and NICTA Technical Report 0400011T.1, Software
Engineering Group, Department of Computer Science,
Keele University.
PMBOK, A Guide to the Project Management Body of
Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), Third Edition, 2004,
Project Management Institute Publications, U.S.A.
Prikladnicki, R., Audy, J. L. N., Shull, F., 2010. Patterns
in Effective Distributed Software Development. IEEE
Software, v. 27, 12-15.
Smite, D., Wohlin, C., Gorschek, T., Feldt R., 2009.
Empirical evidence in global software engineering: a
systematic review. Empirical Softw. Eng., 91-118.
Smite, D., Wohlin, C., Gorschek, T., Feldt, R., 2010.
Empirical evidence in global software engineering: a
systematic review. Empirical Softw. Eng. 2010,
91-118.
MAPPING THE EVOLUTION OF RESEARCH ON GLOBAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING - A Systematic Literature
Review
265