SUPPORTING BUSINESS MODELING USING MULTIPLE NOTATIONS - A Case Study

Moshiur Bhuiyan, Sohel Rana, Kamrul Hasan

2011

Abstract

In this paper, we present a case study that illustrate the use of an approach that facilitates and supports the combined use of i* and BPMN for performing business modeling in a synergistic fashion on a complex project for a large government agency in Australia. We used a constrained development methodology to facilitate this modeling practice. The purpose of this case study is to further demonstrate the applicability of our proposed methodology in a real time, big scale industrial project.

References

  1. Ghose, A., Koliadis, G., Bhuiyan, M., 2006. Correlating Business Process and Organizational Models to Manage Change, Australasian Conference on Information System (ACIS2006).
  2. Ghose, A., Koliadis, G., Bhuiyan, M., 2006. Correlating Business Process and Organizational Models to Manage Change, Australasian Conference on Information System (ACIS2006).
  3. Becker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P., 2005. “Do Process Modelling Techniques Get Better? A Comparative Ontological Analysis of BPMN,” in Campbell, Bruce and Underwood, Jim and Bunker, Deborah, Eds. Proceedings 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, Australia.
  4. Becker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P., 2005. “Do Process Modelling Techniques Get Better? A Comparative Ontological Analysis of BPMN,” in Campbell, Bruce and Underwood, Jim and Bunker, Deborah, Eds. Proceedings 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, Australia.
  5. Bider, I., Johannesson, P., 2002. “Tutorial on: Modeling Dynamics of Business Processes - Key for Building Next Generation of Business Information Systems,” in The 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER2002), Tampere, FL, October 7-11, 2002.
  6. Bider, I., Johannesson, P., 2002. “Tutorial on: Modeling Dynamics of Business Processes - Key for Building Next Generation of Business Information Systems,” in The 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER2002), Tampere, FL, October 7-11, 2002.
  7. CA Clarity™ Project system at http://www.ca.com/us/, Accessed: 02/07/2010.
  8. CA Clarity™ Project system at http://www.ca.com/us/, Accessed: 02/07/2010.
  9. Fischer, L., 2005. Workflow Handbook, Workflow Management Coalition, (WfMC).
  10. Fischer, L., 2005. Workflow Handbook, Workflow Management Coalition, (WfMC).
  11. Fuxman, A., Liu, L., Mylopoulos, J., Pistore, M., Roveri, M., Traverso, P., 2004. Specifying and analyzing early requirements in Tropos. In: Requirements Engineering, Springer London, 9(2) 132-150
  12. Fuxman, A., Liu, L., Mylopoulos, J., Pistore, M., Roveri, M., Traverso, P., 2004. Specifying and analyzing early requirements in Tropos. In: Requirements Engineering, Springer London, 9(2) 132-150
  13. Koliadis, G., Vranesevic, A., Bhuiyan, M., Krishna, A., and Ghose, A., 2006a. Combining i* and BPMN for Business Process Model Lifecycle Management. In the Proceedings of the BPM-2006 Workshop on Grid and Peer-to-Peer based Workflows, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, ISBN 978-3-540-38444-1, 416-427, Springer Verlag.
  14. Koliadis, G., Vranesevic, A., Bhuiyan, M., Krishna, A., and Ghose, A., 2006a. Combining i* and BPMN for Business Process Model Lifecycle Management. In the Proceedings of the BPM-2006 Workshop on Grid and Peer-to-Peer based Workflows, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, ISBN 978-3-540-38444-1, 416-427, Springer Verlag.
  15. Hall, C., Harmon, P., 2005. The 2005 Enterprise Architecture, Process Modeling & Simulation Tools Report, Technical Report, bptends.com.
  16. Hall, C., Harmon, P., 2005. The 2005 Enterprise Architecture, Process Modeling & Simulation Tools Report, Technical Report, bptends.com.
  17. Indulska, M., Recker, C., Rosemann, M., and Green, P., 2009. Business process modeling : current issues and future challenges. In: 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Systems, 8-12 June 2009, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  18. Indulska, M., Recker, C., Rosemann, M., and Green, P., 2009. Business process modeling : current issues and future challenges. In: 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Systems, 8-12 June 2009, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  19. Katzenstein, G., Lerch, J., 2000. Beneath the surface of organizational processes: a social representation framework for business process redesign. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 18(4), (pp. 383-422).
  20. Katzenstein, G., Lerch, J., 2000. Beneath the surface of organizational processes: a social representation framework for business process redesign. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 18(4), (pp. 383-422).
  21. Kavakli, V., and Loucopoulos, P., 1999. “Goal-Driven Business Process Analysis - Application in Electricity Deregulation,” Information Systems, Vol 24, No3, pp. 187-207, 1999.
  22. Kavakli, V., and Loucopoulos, P., 1999. “Goal-Driven Business Process Analysis - Application in Electricity Deregulation,” Information Systems, Vol 24, No3, pp. 187-207, 1999.
  23. Koliadis, G., Vranesevic, A., Bhuiyan, M., Krishna, A., and Ghose, A., 2006b. A combined approach for supporting the business process model lifecycle. Proceedings of the Asia-PacificConference on Information System
  24. Koliadis, G., Vranesevic, A., Bhuiyan, M., Krishna, A., and Ghose, A., 2006b. A combined approach for supporting the business process model lifecycle. Proceedings of the Asia-PacificConference on Information System
  25. Lamsweerde, A., 2001. Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Guided Tour. In: The 5th International Symp. In Requirements Engineering (RE'01), Aug.
  26. Lamsweerde, A., 2001. Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Guided Tour. In: The 5th International Symp. In Requirements Engineering (RE'01), Aug.
  27. Loucopoulos, P., and Kavakli, E., 1995. “Enterprise Modeling and the Teleological Approach to Requirements Engineering,” International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, Vol 4, No1, pp. 45-79.
  28. Loucopoulos, P., and Kavakli, E., 1995. “Enterprise Modeling and the Teleological Approach to Requirements Engineering,” International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, Vol 4, No1, pp. 45-79.
  29. Miers, D., 2004. “The Split Personality of BPM,” Business Process Trends, bptrends.com.
  30. Miers, D., 2004. “The Split Personality of BPM,” Business Process Trends, bptrends.com.
  31. White, S., 2004. Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN), Version 1.0, Business Process Management Initiative (OMG.org).
  32. White, S., 2004. Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN), Version 1.0, Business Process Management Initiative (OMG.org).
  33. Yu, E., 1995. Modeling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering. PhD Thesis, Graduate department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, pp. 124.
  34. Yu, E., 1995. Modeling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering. PhD Thesis, Graduate department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, pp. 124.
  35. Yu, E., 1995b. “Models for Supporting the Redesign of Organizational Work,” Proceedings, Conf. on Organizational Computing Systems (COOCS'95) August 13-16, Milpitas, California, USA. pp. 225-236.
  36. Yu, E., 1995b. “Models for Supporting the Redesign of Organizational Work,” Proceedings, Conf. on Organizational Computing Systems (COOCS'95) August 13-16, Milpitas, California, USA. pp. 225-236.
  37. Smith, H., Fingar, P., 2003. Business Process Management - The Third Wave, Tampa, FL: Meghan-Kiffer Press.
  38. Smith, H., Fingar, P., 2003. Business Process Management - The Third Wave, Tampa, FL: Meghan-Kiffer Press.
  39. Ouyang, C., van der Aalst, P., Dumas, M., and ter Hofstede, M., 2006. “Translating BPMN to BPEL,” BPM Center Report BPM-06-02, BPMcenter.org, 2006.
  40. Ouyang, C., van der Aalst, P., Dumas, M., and ter Hofstede, M., 2006. “Translating BPMN to BPEL,” BPM Center Report BPM-06-02, BPMcenter.org, 2006.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Bhuiyan M., Rana S. and Hasan K. (2011). SUPPORTING BUSINESS MODELING USING MULTIPLE NOTATIONS - A Case Study . In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8425-55-3, pages 301-306. DOI: 10.5220/0003510703010306


in Harvard Style

Bhuiyan M., Rana S. and Hasan K. (2011). SUPPORTING BUSINESS MODELING USING MULTIPLE NOTATIONS - A Case Study . In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8425-55-3, pages 301-306. DOI: 10.5220/0003510703010306


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis11,
author={Moshiur Bhuiyan and Sohel Rana and Kamrul Hasan},
title={SUPPORTING BUSINESS MODELING USING MULTIPLE NOTATIONS - A Case Study},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2011},
pages={301-306},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003510703010306},
isbn={978-989-8425-55-3},
}


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis11,
author={Moshiur Bhuiyan and Sohel Rana and Kamrul Hasan},
title={SUPPORTING BUSINESS MODELING USING MULTIPLE NOTATIONS - A Case Study},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2011},
pages={301-306},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003510703010306},
isbn={978-989-8425-55-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - SUPPORTING BUSINESS MODELING USING MULTIPLE NOTATIONS - A Case Study
SN - 978-989-8425-55-3
AU - Bhuiyan M.
AU - Rana S.
AU - Hasan K.
PY - 2011
SP - 301
EP - 306
DO - 10.5220/0003510703010306


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - SUPPORTING BUSINESS MODELING USING MULTIPLE NOTATIONS - A Case Study
SN - 978-989-8425-55-3
AU - Bhuiyan M.
AU - Rana S.
AU - Hasan K.
PY - 2011
SP - 301
EP - 306
DO - 10.5220/0003510703010306