prices which could be established are higher than for
a weekly rate.
1 - 3 €
WEEKLY RATE MONTHLY RATE ANNUAL RATE
0
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
3 - 6 €
6 - 8 €
3 - 5 €
5 - 10 €
10 - 12 €
12 - 15 €
8 - 10 €
25 - 35 €
35 - 45 €
45 - 55 €
55 - 65 €
Figure 4: Users’ willingness to pay for the News-on-
Demand” IPTV service.
The second evaluated service feature is the
possibility to incorporate 2-second advertisements
between “News”. Advertised contents are a very
common practice which usually impacts users’
experience. Nevertheless, as it can be observed in
Figure 5(a), over the 60% of those polled do not
consider a 2-second advertisement as an impairing
feature and only 16% have been impaired.
Moreover, this behaviour is subsequently confirmed
in figure 5(b), since 72% of polled people would
rather visualize advertisements instead of paying to
remove them from the service. This fact is highly
remarkable, since IPTV service providers may
incorporate advertisements in their platforms
charging for it to advertisers and billing for it.
The “News-on-Demand” package has been
evaluated as an attractive service for which polled
people would be willing to pay. On users’ side
personalization and interactivity enhance users’
experience. On e-business side, the “News-on-
Demand” service enables opportunities to bill both
end-users (for the service provided) and advertisers.
6 CONCLUSIONS
The convergence of technologies and multimedia
services has brought up the possibility to deploy an
IPTV based platform which comprises traditional
Internet services and new multimedia services.
Personalization and interactivity features,
definitely impacts users’ perception. The IPTV
platform designed has been proved to be a suitable
distribution channel to support new IP services.
The concrete IPTV service analyzed shows a
good predisposition at the side of users to pay for
these services. Results obtained show the practical
Advertisements have not impaired my visualization
Advertisements don´t mind to me
Advertisements have disturbed my visualization
No, I won´t never pay more
No, It might be an interesting option, but not.
mmm..I would pay more if the increase was minimum.
I hate advertisements and I would pay more to avoid them.
20%
64%
16%
22%
22%
50%
6%
ADVERTISEMENTS’ IMPACT ON USERS’ BEHAVIOR
WOULD A USER PAY MORE TO AVOID ADVERTISEMENTS?
A
B
Figure 5: Impact of advertisements on users’ behaviour.
nature of both the platform and the IPTV service.
They should also encourage to business
stakeholders to bet for the development of new e-
business strategies focused on the personal user
satisfaction. Further steps may comprise the
platform optimization and the evaluation of other
services (Video on Demand, online gaming).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work has been partially financed by CPUFLIPI
Project (MICINN TIN2010-17298) the Catedra
Telefonica of the Univ. of Zaragoza.
REFERENCES
Aznar, J. I., Viruete, E., Fernandez-Navajas, J., Ruiz-Mas,
J., Saldana, J., Murillo, J. l. (2011). QMoEs: A
Bandwidth Estimation and Monitoring Tool for QoE-
Driven Broadband Networks. 4
th
IFIP International
conference.
Kiousis, S. (2002). “Interactivity: a Concept Explication”,
New Media and Society 4(3): 355-383.
Oliveira, S., Pérez, E., Azcoitia, S., Guijarro, L., Palacios,
J. (2009). Economic Analysis for Transport Network
Evolution. 8th Conference on Telecom, Internet and
media Techno-Economics.
RUBENS. (2010). RUBENS consortium End-user
potential market analysis report. Available at: <
http://wiki-rubens.celtic-initiative.org/index.php>
Steuer, J. S. (1992). “Defining Virtual Reality:
Dimensions Determining Telepresence”, Journal of
Communication 42(4): 73-93.
Telefonica, 2009. “The Information Society in Spain”.
Online report avaialable at: <http://www.slideshare
.net/victori98pt/the-information-society-in-spain>.
Wu, G. (2000). “The Role of Perceived Interactivity in
Interactive Ad Processing”, unpublished dissertation,
University of Texas at Austin.
ICE-B 2011 - International Conference on e-Business
170