![](bga.png)
13. Dwyer, T.: Three dimensional UML using force directed layout. Australian Symposium on
Information Visualisation, Australian Computer Society, Inc, (2001) 77–85.
14. Andriyevska, O., Dragan, N., Simoes, B., Maletic, J.: Evaluating UML class diagram lay-
out based on architectural importance. Proc. of the 3rd International Workshop on Visualiz-
ing Software for Understanding and Analysis, IEEE Computer Society Press (2005) 14–19.
15. Gutwenger, C., Junger, M., Klein, K., Kupke, J., Leipert, S., Mutzel, P:. A new approach
for visualizing UML class diagrams. Proc. of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Software
Visualization, ACM Press (2003) 179–188.
16. Sander, G., Vasiliu, A.: The ILOG JViews graph layout module. Proc. of the 9th Interna-
tional Symposium on Graph Drawing, ser. LNCS, vol. 2265. Springer-Verlag (2002) 469–
475.
17. Gansner, E., North, S.: An open graph visualization system and its applications to software
engineering. Software—Practice and Experience, vol. 30, no. 11, (2000) 1203–1234.
18. Sugiyama, K., Tagawa, S., Toda, M.: Methods for visual understanding of hierarchical
system structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 11, no. 2,
(1981) 109–125.
19. Chimani, M., Gutwenger, C., Junger, M., Klein, K., Mutzel, P., Schulz, M.: The Open
Graph Drawing Framework. Poster at the 15th Шnternational Symposium on Graph Draw-
ing (GD07), Sydney (2007).
20. Seemann, J.: Extending the Sugiyama algorithm for drawing UML class diagrams: To-
wards automatic layout of object-oriented software diagrams. Proc. of the 5th International
Symposium on Graph Drawing (GD ’97), ser. LNCS, vol. 1353. Springer (1997) 415–424.
21. Eichelberger, H.: Aesthetics and automatic layout of UML class diagrams. Ph.D. disserta-
tion, Bayerische Julius-Maximilians-Universitat Wurzburg (2005).
22. Fuhrmann, H., Spönemann, M., Matzen, M., von Hanxleden, R.: Automatic layout and
structure-based editing of UML diagrams. Proc. of the 1st Workshop on Model Based En-
gineering for Embedded Systems Design, Dresden (March 2010)
23. Eichelberger H.: Automatic layout of UML use case diagrams. Proc. of the 4th ACM sym-
posium on Software visualization (2008) 105-114.
24. Bist, G., MacKinnon, N., Murphy, S.: Sequence diagram presentation in technical docu-
mentation. Proc. of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Design of Communica-
tion, NewYork, NY, USA, ACMPress (2004) 128–133.
25. Poranen, T., Makinen, E., Nummenmaa, J.: How to draw a sequence diagram. Proc. of the
Eighth Symposium on Programming Languages and Software Tools, SPLST 2003, Univer-
sity of Kuopio, Department of Computer Science, (2003) 91–102.
26. Wong, K., Dabo, S.: On evaluating the layout of UML diagrams for program comprehen-
sion. Software Qual J (2006) 233–259.
27. Prochnow, S., von Hanxleden, R.: Statechart development beyond WYSIWYG. Proc. of
the ACM/IEEE 10th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages
and Systems (MoDELS’07), Nashville, TN, USA (2007).
28. KIELER project, the Kiel Integrated Environment for Layout Eclipse Rich Client [Online]
Available http://www.informatik.uni-kiel.de/rtsys/kieler
29. Fuhrmann, H., von Hanxleden, R.: On the pragmatics of model-based design. Choppy, C.,
Sokolsky, O. (eds.) Foundations of Computer Software. Future Trends and Techniques for
Development. LNCS, vol. 6028, Springer, Heidelberg (2010) 116-140.
30. Eclipse [Online] Available: http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/
31. Purchase, H. C.: Which aesthetic has the greatest effect on human understanding? Proc. of
the 5th International Symposiumon Graph Drawing, Springer-Verlag (1997) 248–261.
32. Purchase, H. C., Allder, J. A., Carrington, D. A.: Graph layout aesthetics in UML dia-
grams: User preferences. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications (2002) 255–279.
77