![](bg8.png)
support among members. Also to do this can
stimulated and encourage members apply their
knowledge, and active new technologies and new
methods in daily work.
2. Proper Separation of Powers and Authority
There is a trend in the management concept that
Separation of powers and authority through
appropriate to motivate employees.
Knowledge-based staff members of research teams
are not only a premium on good relationships,
reasonable pay and personal growth, but also treat
working independently. They are generally very
strong self-awareness and hope for working with
their favorite way to spend their free time in a job,
and collect the information according to their own
self-control decisions according to these
characteristics of independence and strong demand
for autonomy. Managers must strive to create trust,
harmony, relaxed atmosphere, with full respect for
the personality development of members,
professional characteristics, creativity and autonomy,
and everyone's working style. Furthermore,
Managers must granted greater autonomy and the
autonomy of members, and use members of the
self-management, self-monitoring instead of the
mandatory scheme and close supervision, to
mobilize the enthusiasm of members to create desire
and motivate members to improve the team's overall
performance, as well as reduce management costs.
3. Provide Meaningful Works to Members
In general, the basic needs have been satisfied
among members of the research team. Therefore, the
most inspiring things is to meet the high level of
achievement. Most of them want to get the status to
gain their spirit and performance satisfaction. They
expected reflect their own value through a creative
and challenging work. Therefore, managers should
be to provide members with professional work
evolved challenges of their work to meet their
pursuit of psychological success, so that they have
the greatest satisfaction.
6 CONCLUSIONS
By psychological contracts nature, psychological
contracts vary significantly across groups and even
across different sections or units of the same group.
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) has conducted to
underlying constructs regarding an individual’s
obligation to the university. Three underlying factors
were found and are referred to as meet‘academic
expectations’, ‘commitment’ and finally ‘above and
beyond’. The qualitative research of the paper
identified four key foci of academic
responsibility-the university, the discipline, society
and students, which greatly influenced the formation
and effects of member incentive of scientific
research group based on psychological contracts.
REFERENCES
Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M. & Robson, K.
(2001) Focus groups in social research. London:
SAGE Publications.
Conway, N. C. & Briner, R. B. (2005) Understanding
psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation
of theory and research. Oxford: O.U.P.
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A-M. & Conway, N. (2005) ‘Exchange
relationships: Examining psychological contracts and
perceived organizational support’, Journal of Applied
Psychology, Vol. 90, Issue 4, pp. 774-781.
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutman, M. L. &
Hanson, W. E. (2003) Advanced mixed methods
research designs. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C., eds,
Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural
research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications,
209-240.
Currall, S. C. & Towler, A. J. (2003) Research methods in
management and organizational research: Toward
integration of qualitative and quantitative techniques.
In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C., eds, Handbook of
mixed methods in social & behavioural research.
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications, 513-527.
Dabos, G. E. & Rousseau, D. M. (2004) ‘Mutuality and
reciprocity in the psychological contracts of
employees and employers’, Journal of Applied
Psychology, Vol. 89, No. 1, pp. 52-72.
de Vos, A., Buyens, D. & Schalk, R. (2003)
‘Psychological contract development during
organisational socialisation and the role of
reciprocity’, Journal of Organisational Behaviour,
Vol. 24, pp. 537-559.
DelCampo, R. (2007) ‘Psychological contract violations:
an individual difference perspective’, International
Journal of Management, Vol. 24, pp. 43-52.
Guest, D. E. & Conway, N. (2002) ‘Communicating the
psychological contract: An employer perspective’,
Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 12, No.
2, pp. 22-38.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babib, B. J., Anderson, R. E. &
Tatham, R. E. (2006) Multivariate data analysis.
Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Janssens, M, Sels, L. & Van den Barnde, I. (2003)
‘Multiple types of psychological contracts: A
ICEIS 2011 - 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
430