Figure 8: Curve of project complete probability and
complete time.
time of the 90% complete probability, meanwhile,
there is still possibility that the project cannot be
completed timely. However, according to the critical
chain management method, all the safe time of each
task will be taken away and add it at the completion
point of the whole stage, working as the buffer time
of this stage, protecting the critical chain.
Accordingly, we should tell consultant to estimate
each task based on 50% complete probability time,
namely the average complete time in Figure.8. Try
the best to complete the plan, if cannot finished
timely, adjust the task utilising the buffer time of
this stage.
3.3 Scheduling Plan and Resources in
Accordance with Critical Chain
In the view of resource allocation manager, plan
means two sheets; one is the task sheet, which gives
an overall view of what recourses are needed from
the perspective of project manager. This sheet can be
generated by PROJECT, stating, I need a financial
consultant from 8 to 12 in April to conduct the
financial requirement investigation in preparation for
Project A. The other one real-time priority
arrangement, usually, this sheet stating, do this
immediately or why Project A gets nowhere. The
first sheet changes with the project, maybe once a
week, however, the second sheet changes more
frequently, maybe every hour a change, especially in
large projects.
Traditional project management method also
needs to arrange project plan, allocate resources and
schedule. Following will demonstrate the advantages
and improvements of critical chain theory:
Making detailed project plan and scheduling
resources with critical chain theory is mainly
aimed at current detailed stage targets and
milestones.
Leave no room for buffer time for each task.
In the critical chain method, task scheduling
outlines priority but there is no exact time to
complete the task. This is a significant
difference between traditional theory and
critical chain theory. In the circumstances that
fluctuation cannot be avoided, it is better not
giving the exact start time rather than
estimating the start and finish time and adjust
when fluctuation occurs. So it is critical to
strictly adhere to one rule: Finish your job as
soon as possible when you are assigned with
tasks.
The most significant difference with traditional
project management method lies in scheduling
plans and resources according to the critical
chain rather than non-critical chain. In the
process of scheduling, we should pay particular
attention to the over-loaded bottleneck
resources rather than try to solve every
problem concerning resource contention.
Unless significant changes occur, we do not
rearrange plans frequently, in other words, not
changing the priority of tasks frequently.
Considering the tasks in non-critical chain, we
should also pay certain attention to them. In
order to ensure that non-critical tasks do not
affect the overall progress of the project to the
largest extent, it is strongly recommended that
arrange the start time as early as possible and
leave adequate vibration period between
critical chain tasks and non-critical chain tasks.
As all the safe time in each task has been taken
away and the tasks in non-critical chain have
been brought forward, the problem of resource
contention is more outstanding than traditional
ones.
3.4 Establish Project Tracking
Mechanism
Contingencies are inevitable in the project
implementation process, establishing a tracking
mechanism to monitor the execution of projects is
also of great importance.
This tracking mechanism is called “Buffer Period
Management”. According to the situation task
completion, we can easily monitor how much of the
buffer time has been used. For example, as to
schedule in Figure.5, after 8 days work, technical
consultant (1), senior consultant (2), and
implementation consultant (3) all have finished their
tasks and develop consultant has nearly completed.
ICEIS 2011 - 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
354