network with 128 subcarriers. As an illustrative
example, in case of N
T
= N
R
= 6 and when β = 3.5,
the proposed scheme requires 0.78 × Flops
MMSE
number of flops in order to complete an OFDM
frame reception. Consequently, this reflects to a
strong reduction in the overall computational
complexity, since the proposed methodology does
not produce any additional overhead to the hardware
gear or to the system latency. Furthermore, it is
worth mentioning that the complexity efficiency of
the proposed scheme is a result of the diversity of
the detection approach, while the computational cost
for the decision of the most appropriate equalizer
depends on the calculation of S, which is negligibly
small.
Figure 1: Fraction of saved complexity of the proposed
scheme in comparison to the conventional MMSE-SIC for
different β values, in a MIMO-OFDM system with N
C
=
128. A small number of transmit and receive antennas is
considered in order to approach realistic scenarios,
suitable for practical implementations.
5 CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we presented a new detection-
switching approach for SIC-based receivers in
MIMO-OFDM systems. The proposed scheme is
implemented by two well-known equalizers jointly.
More specifically, it switches between ZF and
MMSE equalization according to a certain threshold,
which is determined by the mean received amplitude
of the overall signal within an OFDM frame. All the
included transmissions have been implemented
under QPSK modulation alphabets. Upper and lower
asymptotic complexity bounds have derived through
a computational complexity analysis. We showed
that by applying the proposed detection switching
approach, up to 22% complexity savings can be
obtained. Some of our most important future aspects
are the study of the proposed hybrid SIC under
MIMO-OFCDM systems and a definition of an
appropriate threshold under QAM modulation
schemes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work is partly supported by UPRC.
REFERENCES
H. Lee, B. Lee and I. Lee, “Iterative Detection and
Decoding With an Improved V-BLAST for MIMO-
OFDM Systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol.
24, no. 3, 2006, pp. 504-513.
S. Verdú, Multiuser Detection, Cambridge University
Press, 1998.
E. C. Kim, J. S. Park and J. Y. Kim, “Co-channel
interference cancellation based on ZF/MMSE SIC
with optimal ordering for cooperative communication
systems,” IEEE 9th Int. Symp. Commun. Inf. Technol.,
Incheon, Korea, Sept. 2009, pp. 404-409.
H. Zhang, H. Dai and B. Hughes, “Analysis on the
diversity-multiplexing tradeoff for ordered MIMO SIC
receivers,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 57, no. 1,
2009, pp. 125-133.
A. Zijian, J. Berkmann, C. Spiegel, T. Scholand, G. H.
Bruck, C. Drewes, B. Gunzelmann, P. Jung, “On
MIMO With Successive Interference Cancellation
Applied to UTRA LTE,” IEEE 3rd Int. Symp.
Commun., Control and Signal Process., St. Julians,
Malta, March 2008, pp. 1009-1013.
D. Marabissi, R. Fantacci and S. Papini, “Robust
Multiuser Interference Cancellation for OFDM
Systems With Frequency Offset,” IEEE Trans.
Wireless Commun., vol. 5, no. 11, 2006, pp. 3068-
3076.
Z. Luo, S. Liu, M. Zhao and Y. Liu, “A Novel Fast
Recursive MMSE-SIC Detection Algorithm for V-
BLAST Systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.,
vol. 6, no. 6, 2007, pp. 2022-2025.
Y. H. Gan, C. Ling and W. H. Mow, “Complex Lattice
Reduction Algorithm for Low-Complexity Full-
Diversity MIMO Detection,” IEEE Trans. Signal
Process., vol. 57, no. 7, 2009, pp. 2701-2710.
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
β
ξ
N
T
= N
R
= 2
N
T
= N
R
= 4
N
T
= N
R
= 6
N
T
= N
R
= 8
WINSYS 2011 - International Conference on Wireless Information Networks and Systems
112