elderly user by cell-phone, e-mail or a website
information board. The IPCSW staff can also send
daily messages for the entertainment of elderly users.
In essence, the main feature of the system is that
elderly users can send status information themselves,
and various people such as an IPCSW staff,
neighbors, nearby supporters, and families can
monitor and share that status information. Crucial to
the implementation of this system is using the
mobility and capability of the users to report health
and status information. This particular information
cannot be obtained using other systems such as in
sensor-type monitoring and emergency calling.
These systems have problems of lack of privacy and
frequent false alarms. Furthermore, in our system,
since users only require a telephone connection, the
initial set-up cost is not an issue and it is very easy
to operate (
Report of Iwate Prefecture Council of Social
Welfare, 2009).
Figure 1: Self-reporting type safety monitoring system.
The number of users has been increasing and it
becomes about 400, recently. In June 2011, the
number of users, supporters and managers is over
700, 500 and 150, respectively and the total number
of system users is over 1,300.
Some elderly users occasionally forget to send
status information for various reasons such as being
very busy or through some medical condition such
as progressive dementia. In this case, an IPCSW
manager can check the user’s status by phoning such
users at a specified time. However, if there is large
number of users, the task involved becomes
burdensome. According to our experience in field
tests on the system in the Kawai area of Miyako city
in the Iwate Prefecture of Japan, the average no-call
rate for 30 to 40 users was 12.3 %. This result means
that 3 or 4 users on average per day would not report
status information, and these users needed to have
their status established by direct calling. If the
number of system users was to increase to 1,000,
which would be a typical expected number in the
future, an IPCSW officer would have to make over
100 telephone calls per day, placing a heavy
scheduling load on them.
The system we have developed has an automatic
calling function that schedules daily specified times
for users. The method for determining the specified
time was not studied and this function is not used
now. If the specified time was too early, users’
motivation in sending status reports would decrease,
and if too late, the delay would be of concern to
relatives. In this paper, we have analyzed the daily
scheduling data for each user, and studied an
algorithm that optimizes auto-calling times in these
user-interface monitoring systems.
Conventional sensor-type monitoring systems are
used to notify any abnormal activity in an elderly
user by detecting the difference from normal
behavior patterns (Shigeki Aoki, 2002, Yoshimitu
Sinagawa, 2005, 2006). Those studies have yielded
algorithms for determining normal/abnormal
patterns using daily-acquired sensor data. Our
algorithm decides the optimal auto-scheduling time
for each user and is basically different from those
studies for sensor-type systems.
3 ANALYSYS OF STORED DATA
3.1 Variability of Daily Reporting Time
Our algorithm objective aims to automatically
determine a scheduling times for calls from the
system to each elderly user so as not to decrease the
motivation of a user from reporting in but also not to
be too late in the day. To develop the algorithm, we
analyzed actual reporting time data obtained from
our experimental system.
Carrying out the experiments, we found that
there were various user types on the daily reporting
time. Figure 2 shows a distribution graph on the
daily reporting time of a typical-user type. The
average reporting time of this user type is 7:50 am.
We can see that the user type usually sends the
safety information between 7:30 am and 8:00 am.
On the other hand, there is random-user type,
which is difficult to know a usual reporting time
because the time distribution area is very wide and
there seems to be no regulation. We think the system
should wait for a long time to make an automatic
reminder call for the random-user type.
In contrast, there is an accurate-user type, which
is reporting the wellness report everyday at almost
OPTIMAL AUTO-REMINDER-CALLING ALGORITHM FOR SELF-REPORTING TYPE SAFETY MONITORING
SYSTEM BY USING TELEPHONE FOR ELDERLY PEOPLE
363