sis capabilities could help to boost the use of Scaffold
Hunter. The development and integration of addi-
tional functionality is encouraged by a modular soft-
ware architecture designed to be easily extendable
and by providing the software as open source.
A promising direction to enhance the currently
supported classification concepts based on tree-like
hierarchies is to support network-like structures. Re-
cently an extension of the scaffold tree approach was
proposed taking all possible parent scaffolds into ac-
count (Varin et al., 2011). This creates so-called scaf-
fold networks, which were shown to reveal additional
scaffolds having a desired biological property. Fur-
thermore networks can be used to represent struc-
tural similarities, e.g. derived from maximum com-
mon substructures, and might prove to be more flexi-
ble when ring-free molecules are considered or func-
tional side-chains should be taken into account. How-
ever, visualizing networks instead of tree-like hierar-
chies without compromising the orientation is chal-
lenging. New navigation concepts have to be devel-
oped and graph layout techniques must be customized
to the specific characteristics of such networks. We
plan to make use of the Open Graph Drawing Frame-
work (OGDF, 2011) for that purpose.
Due to the dynamic nature and the growing extent
of publicly available chemical data it might be help-
ful to also allow direct access to public resources from
within the GUI, e.g., by providing direct links to Pub-
Chem web pages for database compounds.
Scaffold Hunter is implemented in Java and freely
available under the terms of the GNU GPL v3 at
http://scaffoldhunter.sourceforge.net/.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank the participants of student
project group PG552, the group of Prof. Waldmann,
in particular Claude Ostermann and Bj
¨
orn Over, Ste-
fan Mundt, Stefan Wetzel, and Steffen Renner for
their valuable suggestions and their contributions to
the project.
REFERENCES
Agrafiotis, D. K. and Wiener, J. J. M. (2010). Scaffold ex-
plorer: An interactive tool for organizing and mining
structure-activity data spanning multiple chemotypes.
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 53(13):5002–5011.
Bederson, B. B., Grosjean, J., and Meyer, J. (2004). Toolkit
design for interactive structured graphics. IEEE Trans.
Softw. Eng., 30(8):535–546.
Berthold, M. R., Cebron, N., Dill, F., Gabriel, T. R.,
K
¨
otter, T., Meinl, T., Ohl, P., Sieb, C., Thiel, K., and
Wiswedel, B. (2007). KNIME: The Konstanz Infor-
mation Miner. In Studies in Classification, Data Anal-
ysis, and Knowledge Organization (GfKL 2007).
Bon, R. and Waldmann, H. (2010). Bioactivity-guided
navigation of chemical space. Acc Chem Res.,
43(8):1103–14.
Downs, G. M. and Barnard, J. M. (2003). Clustering
Methods and Their Uses in Computational Chemistry,
pages 1–40. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Garcia-Serna, R., Ursu, O., Oprea, T. I., and Mestres, J.
(2010). iPHACE: integrative navigation in pharmaco-
logical space. Bioinformatics, 26(7):985–986.
Herhaus, C., Karch, O., Bremm, S., and Rippmann, F.
(2009). MolWind - mapping molecule spaces to
geospatial worlds. Chemistry Central Journal, 3:32.
IMI (2009). Innovative medicines initiative 2nd call, knowl-
edge management – open pharmacological space.
Irwin, J. J. (2009). Staring off into chemical space. Nat
Chem Biol, 5:536–537.
Klein, K., Kriege, N., and Mutzel, P. (2011). CT-Index:
Fingerprint-based graph indexing combining cycles
and trees. In IEEE 27th International Conference on
Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 1115 –1126.
Lounkine, E., Wawer, M., Wassermann, A. M., and
Bajorath, J. (2010). SARANEA: A freely avail-
able program to mine structure-activity and structure-
selectivity relationship information in compound data
sets. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 50(1):68–78.
Maggiora, G. M. and Shanmugasundaram, V. (2011).
Molecular similarity measures. Methods in Molecu-
lar Biology, 672:39–100.
OGDF (2011). The Open Graph Drawing Framework.
http://www.ogdf.net.
Schuffenhauer, A., Ertl, P., Roggo, S., Wetzel, S., Koch,
M. A., and Waldmann, H. (2007). The scaffold tree
- visualization of the scaffold universe by hierarchical
scaffold classification. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47(1):47–
58.
Schuffenhauer, A. and Varin, T. (2011). Rule-based classi-
fication of chemical structures by scaffold. Molecular
Informatics, 30(8):646–664.
Varin, T., Schuffenhauer, A., Ertl, P., and Renner, S. (2011).
Mining for bioactive scaffolds with scaffold networks
- improved compound set enrichment from primary
screening data. J. Chem. Inf. Model.
Wetzel, S., Klein, K., Renner, S., Rauh, D., Oprea, T. I.,
Mutzel, P., and Waldmann, H. (2009). Interactive ex-
ploration of chemical space with scaffold hunter. Nat
Chem Biol, 5(8):581–583.
Wetzel, S., Wilk, W., Chammaa, S., Sperl, B., Roth, A. G.,
Yektaoglu, A., Renner, S., Berg, T., Arenz, C., Gian-
nis, A., Oprea, T. I., Rauh, D., Kaiser, M., and Wald-
mann, H. (2010). A scaffold-tree-merging strategy
for prospective bioactivity annotation of γ-pyrones.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 49(21):3666–3670.
SCAFFOLD HUNTER - Visual Analysis of Chemical Compound Databases
635