described above, since SPEED does not consider the
increase of the end-to-end distance, the value of
TDSR is decreased as the distance increases. But
since the proposed scheme considers both the
distance and the speed of sink, it has higher value of
TDSR than SPEED.
Figure 3: Time deadline success ratio according to end-to-
end distance.
Figure 4 indicates the TDSR of the proposed
scheme according to both the end-to-end distance
and the virtual region size. We also vary the region
size from 60m to 140m. The speed of the mobile
sink is fixed to 20m/s and the time deadline is 1.0s.
If the grid size is smaller, the frequent updates are
need. Since the mobile sink could move out of the
grid region during data dissemination due to small
grid size, the TDSR is decreased.
Figure 4: Time deadline success ratio according to both
sink speed and grid size.
4 CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we propose a new real-time data
dissemination scheme for mobile sinks in wireless
sensor networks. The existing schemes for real-time
service to stationary sinks exploits the
spatiotemporal approach which forwards data at the
delivery speed calculated through the fixed distance
between a source and a static sink and the desired
time deadline. However, in case of mobile sinks,
since the distance between the source and the sink is
dynamically changed, it is difficult to adapt the
approach. So, our scheme considers the virtual
region to be expected for the mobile sink to locate
in, and calculates the desired delivery speed based
on the region. The proposed scheme exploits the
virtual region and grid based infrastructure.
Simulation results show that the proposed scheme
has better performance than the existing scheme in
terms of guaranteeing the real-time dissemination.
REFERENCES
T. He, J. A. Stankovic, T. F. Abdelzaher, and C. Lu, “A
Spatiotemporal communication protocol for wireless
sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distrib.
Syst., Vol. 16, No. 10, pp. 995-1006, Oct. 2005.
E. Felemban, C. Lee, and E. Ekici, “MMSPEED:
Multipath Multi-SPEED Protocol for QoS Guarantee
of Reliability and Timeliness in Wireless Sensor
Networks,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, Vol. 5,
No. 6, pp. 738-754, Jun. 2006.
Y. Li, C. S. Chen, Y.-Q. Song, Z. Wang, and Y. Sun,
“Enhancing Real-Time Delivery in Wireless Sensor
Networks With Two-Hop Information,” IEEE
Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 5, No. 2,
pp. 113-122, May 2009.
I. F. Akyildiz et al., “A survey on sensor networks,” IEEE
Communications, Vol. 40, pp. 102-114, Aug. 2002.
E. B. Hamida, and G. Chelius, “Strategies for Data
Dissemination to Mobile Sinks in Wireless Sensor
Networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol.15,
no.6, pp.31-37, Dec. 2008
J. Li, J. Jannotti, D. S. J. D. Couto, D. R. Karger, and R.
Morris, “A scalable location service for geographic Ad
hoc routing,” in Proc. 6th Annu. ACM/IEEE Int. Conf.
Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom ’00),
2000, pp. 120–130.
H. Park, T. Kim, J. Lee, M.-S. Jin, and S.-H. Kim, “Sink
location via Inner Rectangular in Wireless Sensor
Networks,” in Proc. IEEE International Conferences
on Advanced Information Networking and
Applications (AINA), May 2009.
B. Karp and H.T. Kung, “GPSR: Greedy perimeter
stateless routing for wireless networks,” In Proc. of the
6th Annual Int'l Conf. on Mobile Computing and
Networking, ACM Press, 2000.
N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin, “GPS-less Low
Cost Outdoor Localization for Very Small Devices,”
IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, vol. 7, no.
5, pp. 28-34, Oct. 2000.
J. Hill and D. Culler, “Mica: a wireless platform for
deeply embedded networks,” IEEE Micro, Vol. 22,
Iss. 6, pp. 12-24, Nov./Dec. 2002.
Scalable Network Technologies, Qualnet, [online]
available: http://www.scalable-networks.com.
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
50
60
70
80
90
100
Time Deadline Success Ratio (TDSR) (%)
Distance from source to sink (m)
Proposed Scheme
SPEED + Footprint Chaining
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Time Deadline Success Ratio (TDSR) (%)
Distance from source to sink (m)
Proposed Scheme (60m)
Proposed Scheme (80m)
Proposed Scheme (100m)
Proposed Scheme (120m)
Proposed Scheme (140m)
PECCS 2012 - International Conference on Pervasive and Embedded Computing and Communication Systems
390