should remain logged-in constantly while they are
online.
• Provide Notifications. Users would like to be
aware when someone has added new content to the
system even when they are not browsing the news.
• Support for discussions. Applications should
support voluntary online discussions.
• Semi-synchronous feedback. Users would
appreciate the possibility of using the discussion
channel as a semi-synchronous chat if there were
more than one user online at a given moment.
• Persistency for asynchronous use. All
information, including links and chat conversations,
should be available to users who were offline during
the activity.
We were able to test our application with a limited
number of users and within limited amount of time.
This research was conducted in an explorative way
to investigate users’ thoughts, and our contribution
is more with regard to implications for future
designs. To reach a full understanding of wider
audiences, the system should be a publicly available
and it should be tested during a longer period of
time. Further data collection is required to determine
how the service affects interpersonal relationships
and whether social connections enable users to
construe content more efficiently.
8 CONCLUSIONS
Directed onsite sharing enables users to share and
discover mundane content among close-knit groups,
to simultaneously browse the news and to broadcast
publicly relevant articles to SNSs. Users perceive
broadcasted and directed sharing approaches
differently, which leads to different practices and
needs. The native toolbar was used to share mutually
important and local content with members of the
group. Recipients’ interests were the focus.
Particularly in contrast with the broadcast nature and
self-presentational aims of many link-sharing
services, the barrier for sharing is lower and the
reported frequency is higher. Users want to remain
aware of with whom they share and what others
have shared. They are more eager to discuss within
small circle of friends about local and current things
that are relevant to them, instead of contributing to
the public discussion. Based on our results, we
presented recommendations for design for future
applications facilitating directed onsite sharing.
REFERENCES
Bernstein, M., Marcus, A., Karger, D. and Miller, R.,
2010, Enhancing directed content sharing on the web.
In CHI ’10: Proceedings of the 28th international
conference on Human factors in computing systems,
pages 971–980, ACM.
Gary, M. R. Optimal binary identification procedures.
SIAM J. Appl. Math. 23, 2 (Feb. 1972), 173–186.
Dearman, D., Kellar, M. and K. N. Truong, 2008, An
examination of daily information needs and sharing
opportunities. CSCW ’08, pages 679–688, ACM.
Golder, S., and Huberman. B., 2006, Usage patterns of
collaborative tagging systems. In Journal of
Information Science, volume 32, page 198.
Granovetter, M., 1973, The strength of weak ties. In
American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), pages 1360–
1380.
Hong, L., Chi, E. H., Budiu, R., Pirolli, P. and Nelson L.,
2008, Spartag.us: a low cost tagging system for
foraging of web content. In Proceedings of the
working conference on Advanced visual interfaces,
AVI ’08, pages 65–72, ACM.
Höök, K., 2003, Designing Information Spaces: The
Social Navigation Approach. In Designing
Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach.
Springer.
Koroleva, K., Krasnova, H., and Gunther, O., 2010, Stop
spamming me! – Exploring information overload on
Facebook. In AMCIS 2010 Proceedings, AMCIS ’10
Leino, J., Räihä, K. and Finnberg, S., 2011, All the News
That's Fit to Read: Finding and Recommending News
Online, In Proceedings of INTERACT '11, Springer.
Maltz, D. and Ehrlich, K., 1995, Pointing the way: active
collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI
conference on Human factors in computing systems,
CHI ’95, pages 202–209, ACM.
Milic-Frayling, N., Hicks, M., Jones, R., and Costello. J.,
2008, Exploring personal broadcast channels for rich
media sharing in close relationships. In Proceedings of
the 7th International Conference on Mobile and
Ubiquitous Multimedia, MUM ’08, pages 23–30,
ACM.
Nardi, B., Whittaker, S. and Bradner E., 2000, Interaction
and outeraction: instant messaging in action. In
Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on
Computer supported cooperative work, CSCW ’00,
pages 79–88, ACM.
Olsson, T., Soronen, H., and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K.
User needs and design guidelines for mobile services
for sharing digital life memories. In MobileHCI ’08:
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on
Human computer interaction with mobile devices and
services, pages 273–282, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
ACM.
Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T. and
Olmstead, K., 2010, Understanding the participatory
news consumer: How internet and cell phone users
have turned news into a social experience. Technical
Report, Pew Research Centre.
WEBIST2012-8thInternationalConferenceonWebInformationSystemsandTechnologies
372