
 
should remain logged-in constantly while they are 
online.  
•  Provide Notifications. Users would like to be 
aware when someone has added new content to the 
system even when they are not browsing the news. 
•  Support for discussions. Applications should 
support voluntary online discussions. 
•  Semi-synchronous feedback. Users would 
appreciate the possibility of using the discussion 
channel as a semi-synchronous chat if there were 
more than one user online at a given moment. 
•  Persistency for asynchronous use. All 
information, including links and chat conversations, 
should be available to users who were offline during 
the activity. 
We were able to test our application with a limited 
number of users and within limited amount of time. 
This research was conducted in an explorative way 
to investigate users’ thoughts, and our contribution 
is more with regard to implications for future 
designs. To reach a full understanding of wider 
audiences, the system should be a publicly available 
and it should be tested during a longer period of 
time. Further data collection is required to determine 
how the service affects interpersonal relationships 
and whether social connections enable users to 
construe content more efficiently. 
8 CONCLUSIONS 
Directed onsite sharing enables users to share and 
discover mundane content among close-knit groups, 
to simultaneously browse the news and to broadcast 
publicly relevant articles to SNSs. Users perceive 
broadcasted and directed sharing approaches 
differently, which leads to different practices and 
needs. The native toolbar was used to share mutually 
important and local content with members of the 
group. Recipients’ interests were the focus. 
Particularly in contrast with the broadcast nature and 
self-presentational aims of many link-sharing 
services, the barrier for sharing is lower and the 
reported frequency is higher. Users want to remain 
aware of with whom they share and what others 
have shared. They are more eager to discuss within 
small circle of friends about local and current things 
that are relevant to them, instead of contributing to 
the public discussion. Based on our results, we 
presented recommendations for design for future 
applications facilitating directed onsite sharing. 
REFERENCES 
Bernstein, M., Marcus, A., Karger, D. and Miller, R., 
2010, Enhancing directed content sharing on the web. 
In CHI ’10: Proceedings of the 28th international 
conference on Human factors in computing systems, 
pages 971–980, ACM. 
Gary, M. R. Optimal binary identification procedures.  
SIAM J. Appl. Math. 23, 2 (Feb. 1972), 173–186. 
Dearman, D., Kellar, M. and K. N. Truong, 2008, An 
examination of daily information needs and sharing 
opportunities. CSCW ’08, pages 679–688, ACM. 
Golder, S., and Huberman. B., 2006, Usage patterns of 
collaborative tagging systems. In Journal of 
Information Science, volume 32, page 198. 
Granovetter, M., 1973, The strength of weak ties. In 
American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), pages 1360–
1380. 
Hong, L., Chi, E. H., Budiu, R., Pirolli, P. and Nelson L., 
2008, Spartag.us: a low cost tagging system for 
foraging of web content. In Proceedings of the 
working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, 
AVI ’08, pages 65–72, ACM. 
Höök, K., 2003, Designing Information Spaces: The 
Social Navigation Approach. In Designing 
Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach. 
Springer. 
Koroleva, K., Krasnova, H., and Gunther, O., 2010, Stop 
spamming me! – Exploring information overload on 
Facebook. In AMCIS 2010 Proceedings, AMCIS ’10 
Leino, J., Räihä, K. and Finnberg, S., 2011, All the News 
That's Fit to Read: Finding and Recommending News 
Online, In Proceedings of INTERACT '11, Springer. 
Maltz, D. and Ehrlich, K., 1995, Pointing the way: active 
collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI 
conference on Human factors in computing systems, 
CHI ’95, pages 202–209, ACM.  
Milic-Frayling, N., Hicks, M., Jones, R., and Costello. J., 
2008, Exploring personal broadcast channels for rich 
media sharing in close relationships. In Proceedings of 
the 7th International Conference on Mobile and 
Ubiquitous Multimedia, MUM ’08, pages 23–30, 
ACM. 
Nardi, B., Whittaker, S. and Bradner E., 2000, Interaction 
and outeraction: instant messaging in action. In 
Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on 
Computer supported cooperative work, CSCW ’00, 
pages 79–88, ACM. 
Olsson, T., Soronen, H., and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. 
User needs and design guidelines for mobile services 
for sharing digital life memories. In MobileHCI ’08: 
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on 
Human computer interaction with mobile devices and 
services, pages 273–282, New York, NY, USA, 2008. 
ACM. 
Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T. and  
Olmstead, K., 2010, Understanding the participatory 
news consumer: How internet and cell phone users 
have turned news into a social experience. Technical 
Report, Pew Research Centre. 
WEBIST2012-8thInternationalConferenceonWebInformationSystemsandTechnologies
372