![](bg9.png)
REFERENCES
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., and Archer, W.,
(2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer
conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous
Learning Networks , 5(2), 1-17. doi:10.1.1.95.9117
Asterhan, C., and Schwarz, B., (2010). Online moderation
of synchronous e-argumentation. International
Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative
Learning, 5, 259-282. doi:10.1007/s11412-010-9088-2
Clark, C. M., and Peterson, P. L., (1986). Teachers’
thought processes. In M.C. Wittrock (Eds.), Handbook
of research on teaching. New York: MacMillan.
De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., and Valcke,
M., (2010). Studying Thought Processes of Online
Peer Tutors through Stimulated-Recall Interviews.
Higher Education, 59(5), 645-661.
doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9273-2
Den Brok, P., (2001). Teaching and student outcomes: A
study on teachers’ thoughts and actions from an
interpersonal and a learning activities perspective.
Dissertation, Utrecht University.
Gil, J., Schwarz, B. B., and Asterhan, C. S. C., (2007).
Intuitive moderation styles and beliefs of teachers in
CSCLbased argumentation. In C.A. Chinn, G. Erkens
& S. Puntambekar (Eds.) Mice, minds and society.
Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative
Learning Conference (pp. 219-228). International
Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., and Kanselaar, G., (2007).
Visualization of agreement and discussion processes
during computer-supported collaborative learning.
Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1105-1125.
doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.005
Kreber, C., and Cranton, P. A., (1997). Teaching as
scholarship: A model for instructional development.
Issues and Inquiry in College Learning and Teaching,
19(2), 4-13.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., and Jochems, W. (2003).
Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in
computer-supported collaborative learning
environments: A review of the research. Computers in
Human Behavior, 19, 335-353. doi:10.1016/S0747-
5632(02)00057-2
Molenaar, I., van Boxtel, C. and Sleegers, P. J. C., (2011).
Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning
arrangement. Instructional Science, 39, 785-803.
doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9154-1
Myhill, D., and Warren, P., (2005). Scaffolds or
straitjackets? Critical moments in classroom discourse.
Educational Review, 57, 55–69.
doi:10.1080/0013191042000274187
Salmon, G., (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching
and learning online. London: Kogan Page Limited.
Soller, A., Martinez, A., Jermann, P., and Muehlenbrock,
M., (2005). From mirroring to guiding: A review of
state of the art technology for supporting collaborative
learning. International Journal of AI in Education, 15,
261–290. doi:10.1.1.26.2186
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., and Beishuizen, J., (2010).
Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of
research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271-
296. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Van Diggelen, W., Janssen, J., and Overdijk, M., (2008).
Analysing and presenting interaction data: a teacher,
student and researcher perspective. ICLS'08
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on
International conference for the learning sciences -
Volume 3.
Vlachopoulos, P. and Cowan, J., (2010). Choices of
approaches in e-moderation: Conclusions from a
grounded theory study. Active Learning in Higher
Education, 11(3), 213-224.
doi: 10.1177/1469787410379684
Volman, M., (2005). A variety of roles for a new type of
teacher: Educational technology and the teaching
profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 15-
31. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.11.003
Vygotsky, L. S., (1978). Mind and society: The
development of higher mental processes. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
CSEDU2012-4thInternationalConferenceonComputerSupportedEducation
312