ELECTRONIC WORD-OF-MOUTH VIA TWITTER
Customer eWOM Motivations and Intentions
a
Basim Musallam
1
and Rodrigo Magalhães
2, 3
1
Researcher, Kuwait Masstricht Business School, Salmiya, Kuwait
2
Professor of Information Systems and Organization, Kuwait Maastricht Business School, Salmiya, Kuwait
3
Researcher, CIEO - Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, University of Algarve, Algarve, Portugal
Keywords: Twitter, Electronic Word-of-mouth, Online Consumer Behaviour, Online Consumer Motivation, eWOM
Intentions, Consumer Engagement, Corporate Response Strategy, Interactivity.
Abstract: The study aims to explore customers’ motivational factors to express their opinions in Twitter regarding
company performance, products and services. Using Twitter as the main medium of the study, an electronic
questionnaire has been implemented to gather data. A total of 1,192 complete valid responses have been
collected from 5,011 hits on Twitter. Data were statistically analyzed to extract the strongest factors. The
results show that consumers are driven by multiple motives. Concern for Other Consumers,
Extraversion/Positive Self Enhancement, Venting Negative Feelings and Helping the Company are the
primary factors. Furthermore, we have identified early symptoms of grouped eWOM in Twitter against and
in favour of companies which carry an important message to companies regarding the need to formulate
proactive strategies to deal the with upcoming trend of Twitter powers for companies. The study was carried
out in Kuwait.
a
This paper is partially financed by the Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal
1 INTRODUCTION
In an effort to understand what factors companies
should take into consideration when it comes to
dealing with social media, many scholars have tried
to identify the motivations behind user participation
in online media. Nardi et al., (2004) have identified
the motivations behind people participation in online
medium by documenting user lives, opinion
expressions, emotional and thinking outlets.
Keitzmann, et al. (2011) focused on what drives
online conversations and suggested that people seek
self-esteem through being among the opinion leaders
in the medium with trendy and hot ideas. Other
motivations revolve around user desires to meet
similar people to exchange ideas and opinions, with
user messages being heard for humanitarian causes
and positive effects.
The common factors linking users are the social
connections and the information sharing which feed
inner self-motivations to be involved in the social
media sphere (Foster et al., 2010). These
motivational elements have been categorized as both
functional goals for information exchange and
hedonic goals for rich and positive experiences (Hur,
et al., 2009). In order to engage in an infinite loop
between the user, other users, and the company, the
company ultimately should support enriched
conversations in social media (Parent et al., 2011).
This paper follows up the findings and
recommendations of Hennig-Thurau et al., (2004)
and Goldsmith and Horowitz (2006) regarding the
need to refine the mesurements used in these studies.
Additionally, it addresses customer motives within a
new cultural contex with the new meduim of
Twitter. The aim of this exploratory study is to
investigate customer intentions to engage with a
company by commenting on it either positively or
nagatively, through writing tweets in Twitter.
The paper proceeds with the literature review in
Section 2. Section 3 outlines the research
metholdogy and in Section 4 the findings of the
study are presented. Section 5 presents conclusions
and implications for both managerial practice and
suggestions for future research.
558
Musallam B. and Magalhães R..
ELECTRONIC WORD-OF-MOUTH VIA TWITTER - Customer eWOM Motivations and Intentions.
DOI: 10.5220/0003935305580564
In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST-2012), pages 558-564
ISBN: 978-989-8565-08-2
Copyright
c
2012 SCITEPRESS (Science and Technology Publications, Lda.)
2 BACKGROUND
2.1 eWOM via Twitter
The investigation of Twitter eWOM is timely and
necessary. The most prominent output of the
processes of interaction and communication is the
flow of messages between users, which spread in the
form of eWOM. eWOM has been defined as “a
statement made by potential actual or former
customers about a producer or a company which is
made available to a multitude of people and
institutions via the internet” (Hennig-Thurau et al.,
2004:39)
Shared opinions and reactions are passed
electronically from person to person, thus creating a
mechanism that impacts consumers’ decision
making. This mechanism is effective, especially due
to the memory features of Twitter (Jones et al.,
2009) which allows eWOM to be accessed at any
moment, as eWOM is visible not only online but
also offline with high accessibility and forwarding
capabilities through mobile devices (Hennig-Thurau,
et al., 2010).
eWOM has a multitude of features which are
appropriate for business purposes. One distinctive
feature is that companies have no control over
eWOM once unleashed online coupled with hybrid
interpersonal mass communication channels (Jansen,
et al., 2009). It is driven by online interactivity of
consumers seeking, giving, and passing opinions and
information, which reinforces credibility and
reliability (Chu and Kim, 2011). Twitter offers
eWOM anonymity and limitless geographical reach.
Another feature is endogenous to Twitter, where
eWOM plays a dual role as the informant precursor
and the recommender outcome. It thrives on the
push-push-pull communication with positive
feedback mechanism creating a ripple effect (Huang,
et al., 2009) that is not matched by any other
communication channel in terms of speed. A high
number of positive eWOM messages will influence
more purchases, which in turn will restart the whole
cycle on a larger scale (Duan et al., 2008).
These features offer companies unprecedented
chances to monitor eWOM´s spreading scale, and,
for purposes of researching the behaviour of re-
senders, it gives companies the opportunity to have a
physical look at the written comments of consumers
electronically documented (Huang et al., 2009).
2.2 Customer Motivations and
Intentions
Customers are the key players in Twitter. They are
part of the majority of the Twitter environment, the
receivers who act as the real engines to stimulate
eWOM. Those are the ones that the company strives
to please while aiming toward getting closer to them.
Thus, to build relationships with them is crucial and
this requires understanding their behaviours and
motivations in engaging with Twitter (Hanna et al.,
2011).
Many scholars have investigated consumer
behaviours in eWOM, from seeking eWOM,
providing eWOM and passing on eWOM The
research model used in this study (see Figure 1) built
upon the work of Hennig-Thurau et al., (2004),
which in turn is the outcome of previous WOM
models. Also, the work of Goldsmith and Horowitz
(2006) is adapted to the model.
Our model is built on four “utility types” or
reasons for users to provide eWOM messages. The
Focus-Related Utility encompasses the individual
motivation to add value to online community with
user input; Consumption Utility revolves around the
consumption of other user inputs and gaining
external opinions; Approval Utility deals with formal
and informal praising for user contributions and thus
feeds own satisfaction of peer approvals;
Homeostase Utility is built on balance theory which
states that individuals try to restore the balance once
its original state has been changed, i.e. equilibrium
changes with satisfaction or dissatisfaction which, in
turn, drive people to express their emotions and
revert to their equilibrium state.
Hennig-Thurau et al., (2004) have identified
eight factors that influence consumer motivation in
composing eWOM messages. The economic
incentives factor does not apply to the Twitter
environment and thus was eliminated from the
study. However, the remaining factors are all tightly
related to the reasons of why customers use Twitter
as a preferred eWOM format.
Concern for Other Consumers, Helping the
Company, and Social Benefits fall under Focus-
Related Utility. Advice Seeking belongs to
Consumption Utility; Extraversion/Positive Self-
Enhancement falls under Approval Utility and
Venting Negative Feelings is related to Homeostase
Utility.
One extra factor, the exertion of (Collective)
Power over Companies), which falls under Focus-
Related Utility has been extracted from the platform
assistance factor which focuses on operator
ELECTRONICWORD-OF-MOUTHVIATWITTER-CustomereWOMMotivationsandIntentions
559
assistance and convenience (Hennig-Thurau et al.,
2010). Lastly, Influence of Others, a factor that
touches on the way that customers are influenced by
other as well as being prone to imitate others
(Goldsmith and Horowitz, 2006).
2.2.1 Venting Negative Feelings
This factor is the most obvious one when it comes to
negative eWOM, capturing the way that negative
experiences influence intentions (Jones et al., 2009).
Venting negative feelings is the natural process for
users to restore the balance and get back to their
equilibrium state once they are exposed to an
unsatisfactory experience (Hennig-Thurau et al.,
2004). It serves the goal of lessening frustration and
diminishing discontent with negative experience and
resulting anxiety. Thus the following hypothesis is
formed:
H1: Venting negative feelings positively impacts
user intentions to engage in Twitter messages about
companies.
2.2.2 Concern for Others
Customers are driven by their motivation to engage
in eWOM communications in order to create and
maintain social relationships, to share their
satisfaction, dissatisfaction, and to keep the
information circulating online (Chu and Kim, 2011).
The factor has altruism in its heart, where the act of
doing something good for others has no reciprocity
element in it. People enjoy giving and aiding others
with their inputs without expectations of anything in
return. Such motive is derived from traditional
WOM but Hennig-Thurau et al., (2004) argued its
relation to eWOM with the genuine desire to help
others is emphasized in eWOM intentions. This
feeds the following hypothesis:
H2: Concern for others positively impacts user
intentions to engage in Twitter messages about
companies.
2.2.3 Social Benefits
Twitter users follow each other and form affiliations
to create virtual bonds which act as forms of social
integration and identification, which are perceived as
social benefits. The genuine desire to communicate
with similar minded people and to have their values
and inputs assist their virtual social interaction
influence the psychological need to flock around
those who share their values and interests. This
factor is used to pose the following hypothesis:
H3: Social benefits positively impacts user
intentions to engage in Twitter messages about
companies.
2.2.4 Extraversion/Positive Self
Enhancement
Customers are motivated by their desire to receive
gratification from others. They share their
experience and spread eWOM while enhancing the
perception of source expertise (Jalilvand et al.,
2010). User articulation in eWOM serves the
purpose of feeding self-related needs that vary from
self-image and prestigious intellectual perception, to
social status. In the Twitter environment, customer
eWOM can be used to reflect a level of knowledge
about given products or services. It creates the
impression of one being an insider regarding the
company’s internal affairs, while projecting oneself
as mass influencer and opinion expert. The factor
helps to form the following hypothesis:
H4: Extraversion/positive self enhancement
positively impacts user intentions to engage in
Twitter messages about companies.
2.2.5 Helping the Company
The customer desire to give the company something
in return for gained satisfaction and appreciation
drives this factor. This motive is the result of the
same psychological background as altruism, as the
customer feels that companies with good
performance deserve to be rewarded with positive
eWOM. This is also a form of commitment to the
company and to the novelty of its product (Jalilvand,
et al. 2010). The factor is hypothesized to impact
user intentions in Twitter as follows:
H5: Helping the company positively impacts user
intentions to engage in Twitter messages about
companies.
2.2.6 Collective Power Over Companies
Unsatisfied customers engage in collective
complaints against companies using the power of
their virtual social influence. The accumulated
number of customer messages resulting from the
consumption of a company’s products and services
acts as a powerful tool against the company’s image
and reputation (Hennig-Thurau et al., 2004). Twitter
users are in their millions; this is combined with the
long-term availability of memory arising from stored
messages, to form a very real collective power of
customers which threatens the company with public
WEBIST2012-8thInternationalConferenceonWebInformationSystemsandTechnologies
560
criticism. The factor is reflected in the following
hypothesis:
H6: Collective power over companies positively
impacts user intentions to engage in Twitter
messages about companies.
2.2.7 Influence of Others
In the Twitter sphere, customers are prone to be
influenced by the behaviours and practices of other
users. They imitate what has worked for others and
copy them, especially if the approaches used by
others have been proven fruitful (Goldsmith and
Horowitz, 2006). It can be argued that peer influence
plays a significant role since users follow those who
are like-minded. Hence, the adoption level of similar
practices is justified by a higher number of positive
eWOM (Doh and Huang, 2010). The factor is used
to propose the following hypothesis:
H7: Influence of others positively impacts user
intentions to engage in Twitter messages about
companies.
2.2.8 Advice Seeking to Get Information
This factor serves both sides of seeking opinion;
prior- and post-purchase or consumption of products
or services. Customers provide their feedback based
on their consumption and elaborate on their
experience to provide insights to others (Goldsmith
and Horowitz, 2006). It is a way to: (a) offer or
solicit objective opinions regarding how to solve a
problem, (b) enlighten others with required skills for
consumption and (c) obtain more specific and useful
feedback. The next hypothesis addresses this factor:
H8: Advice seeking positively impacts user
intentions to engage in Twitter messages about
companies.
3 METHODOLOGY
Adhering to the aims of this study, we have adopted
Twitter as a research tool for both sampling and
collecting data. Using it as both the environment
containing the eWOM phenomena under
investigation and as the tool deployed to apply the
theory has proved to be quite beneficial.
The questionnaire is the primary data collection
instrument in this study. It has been designed to
assess the motivations behind customer intentions
into composing eWOM messages in Twitter about
company products, services or performance. The
aim of the questionnaire is to determine the main
factors influencing consumers in mentioning
companies on Twitter. All factors have been adapted
from the reviewed literature as shown in Figure 1.
The questionnaire was divided into two parts
consisting of 39 statements. It made use of a Likert
five-point scale, ranging from 1=Strongly Disagree
to 5=Strongly Agree. The first part includes five
statements covering general information i.e. age,
gender, education and nationality (GNR1-4) and one
elimination statement for validity purpose (GNR5).
The second part was divided into nine sections and
designed to investigate consumer behaviours in
engaging in eWOM. A first draft of the
questionnaire written in English and Arabic and
presented in electronic format was piloted before
implementation.
The first section of second part was dedicated for
the dependent variable of the study. It aimed at
assessing users intentions when they express
themselves in Twitter, either positively or
negatively, reporting on their experiences with a
particular company. Statements were built on the
eWOM definition by Hennig-Thurau et al., (2004)
(see Table 1).
The sampling was deliberately restricted to
Twitter users. The implications of using Twitter as a
research tool were also put into practice in adopting
it as the vehicle for creating the viral effect of
eWOM in the form of an electronic survey link. The
electronic format questionnaire link was distributed
strictly online via Twitter users who are the market
mavens as characterized by Kaplan and Haenlein
(2011a). These are the opinion leaders in the Kuwait
Twitter-sphere who have acted as our distribution
nodes for our survey in the Twitter network.
The sample of opinion leaders was selected from
the pool of 1,000 top ranked Twitter users in
Kuwait, in terms of number of followers with a
minimum of 1,000 followers covering both genders
and different age groups. Among the top tanked,
users who are actively involved in the Twitter-
sphere with emphasis on bloggers with Twitter
accounts, were identified and selected as market
mavens. Political figures, corporate accounts and
official personnel accounts have been omitted from
the sample.
The data collection process started by contacting
thirty influential users in the Kuwait Twitter sphere,
from which twenty three agreed to spread the
questionnaire link by re-tweeting it to their follower
networks. The retweets were intended to cause a
ripple effect aimed at reaching the maximum
possible number of users.
ELECTRONICWORD-OF-MOUTHVIATWITTER-CustomereWOMMotivationsandIntentions
561
The data analysis was conducted with tools for
statistical analysis such as factor analysis, regression
analysis, and variance extract. The strength between
independent variables and the dependent variable
was examined in order to identify the most effective
and significant factors contributing to eWOM
intentions.
Table 1: Statement of eWOM inentions.
Indicator: It is likely that I
... write a tweet regarding my positive experience with
my bank/telecom company
... write a tweet regarding my negative experience with
my bank/telecom company
... forward a tweet (Re-tweet) about other people
experiences with my bank/telecom company
... participate in Twitter conversation regarding my
bank/telecom performance
4 RESULTS
We have used free Twitter applications to monitor
the questionnaire link distribution and responses
network. The electronic link was re-tweeted 351
times within 72 hours, at which point it reached the
cut-off date. The sample caused the desired ripple
effect for the questionnaire link by being the source
of retweets.
The link was visited 5,011 times from which
2,755 were abandoned visits with respondents
leaving the first page without filling in the
questionnaire. Out of the remaining 2,256 responses,
917 were only partially filled which can be
explained by the fact that most participants accessed
the link through smart phones and any mobile
network malfunction would have reset the survey.
We ended up with 1,339 usable responses.
In order to exclude random and non-pertinent
responses, these were filtered by asking respondents
whether their responses reflect their opinions about
telecommunication companies or banks inside
Kuwait or outside it. The filter eliminated 147
responses of users who based their opinions on firms
outside Kuwait which left us with 1,192 full
responses to conduct the remaining analysis.
In order to investigate the significance of the
research model, we have applied standard linear
regression to the model’s variables as shown in
Figure 1. The model’s significance level (p-value) of
.000
a
shows that there is high level of significance
between all factors in the model. The Pearson’s
Correlation Coefficient gives the indication that
variance among all eight factors leading to the
dependent variable is 27.8%.
The regression analysis results were used to
investigate the validity of the hypotheses and to test
the level of significance with which each factor
influences and predicts the dependent variable. As
shown in Figure 1, two variables have fallen short in
terms of statistic significance with the coefficient p-
value > 0.05; namely Influence of Others (0.569)
and Advice Seeking (0.468).
Based on the regression analysis, we conclude
that hypotheses H7 and H8 cannot be accepted,
while all remaining hypotheses (H1, H2, H4, H5 and
H6) are accepted. We recall the fact that hypothesis
H3 related to Social Benefits has been omitted from
proposed design, with the corresponding statements
being grouped with other factors.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Our results concur with the findings by Hennig-
Thurau et al., (2004) and show that the factors
adapted from the model by Goldsmith & Horowitz
(2006), which fall under Consumption Utility do not
impact customer intentions and are not applicable in
the Twitter sphere, at least not in Kuwait. Twitter is
a nurturing medium for eWOM when it comes to
composing and passing messages with absence of
advice seeking motive. Our findings also support
Kwon and Sung’s (2011) when these authors state
that users are prone to tweet less frequently when it
comes to company products and services, as
opposed to mentioning company names in tweets.
We attribute this to customers being driven to tweet
with their opinions and sentiments about events and
incidents that happen in their environment. Thus has
more of broadcasting nature than requesting
assistance and information.
The study aims to explore and identify what
triggers consumers into contributing to Twitter’s
eWOM by specifically mentioning companies in
their tweets. Thus the managerial impactions of our
study are quite pertinent.
Individual and personalized approaches with the
help of friendly, informal language and tone will
absorb frustration and anger from customers and let
them feel they are special, and that the company is
there to listen and to give them attention. It will
satisfy the positive self-enhancement motivation of
customers who will receive replies that solve their
problems, while feeding their ego and image. This
illustrates precisely Keitzmann et al., (2011)
contention that conversations are driven by opinion
WEBIST2012-8thInternationalConferenceonWebInformationSystemsandTechnologies
562
Figure 1: The research model showing standard linear regression results.
leaders’ self esteem. Such an approach will
humanize company brand and boost customer
perception about the human characteristics of
Twitter’s electronic format (Kwon and Sung, 2011).
Companies need to pay attention to
onlinegrouping against them and try to absorb it
with proper responsive strategies. Online consumer
activists and groups can cause catastrophic uproars
which should be handled with care at the early
stages. At the end of the day, what has shaken
governments can also shake the ground beneath
companies, especially where those grounds have
proven to be slippery.
Embracing negative eWOM in Twitter and
offering consumers sincere ears are the online shock
absorbers. In the age of Twitter, social media tools
should be integrated into the company’s strategy in
order to monitor the effects of the company’s
decisions and to encourage users to express
themselves freely and not in a controlling way.
Once the company understands customer
motivations and acts accordingly this will pave the
way for engaging in conversations where customer
sentiments thrive. The conversation feedback is what
makes the difference, be it recommendations,
suggestions or even questions, as suggested by
Jalilvand, et al. (2010). This interactive
communication pays dividends when it comes to
market research (Kaplan and Haenlein, 2011b).
Customers acting as co-producers with their unique
inputs create substantial amounts of data, which can
be pulled up at any given and used as market
intelligence.
Future research should revolve around fine
tuning factors of extraversion and positive self-
enhancement motivations in order to explore how to
deal with them and their noise should bring valuable
insights to academic level and business level
likewise. The replication of the study in other
regions with high rates of Internet penetrations
should provide insights into key cultural differences.
Finally, an attempt to investigate the motives to
retweet tweets with company names should capture
the majority of lurking Twitter users who would
rather keep to low presence and contribute with
retweets rather than forming their own tweets with
their names.
REFERENCES
Chu, S.C., Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of Consumer
Engagement in Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) in
Social Networking Sites. International Journal of
Advertising, 30(1), pp.47-75.
Doh, S. J., Hwang, J. S. (2009). How Consumers Evaluate
eWOM (Electronic Word of Mouth) Messages. Cyber
Psychology & Behavior, 12(2). pp.193-197.
Duan, W., Gu, B., Whinston, A. B. (2008). The dynamics
of online word of mouth and products sales – An
empirical investigation of the movie industry. Journal
of Retailing, 84(2), pp.233-242.
ELECTRONICWORD-OF-MOUTHVIATWITTER-CustomereWOMMotivationsandIntentions
563
Foster, M. K., Francescucci, A., West, B. C. (2010). Why
Users Participate in Online Social Networks.
International Journal of e-Business Management,
4(1). pp.3-19.
Goldsmith, R. E., Horowitz, D. (2006). Measuring
Motivations for Online Opinion Seeking. Journal of
Interactive Advertising, 6(2). pp.1-16.
Hanna, R., Rohm, A., Crittenden, V.L. (2011). We’re all
connected: The power of the social media ecosystem.
Business Horizons, 54, pp.265-273.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walssh, G., Gremler,
D. D. (2004). Electronic Word of Mouth Vis
Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates
Consumers To Articulate Themselves on The Internet?
Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), pp.38-51.
Huang, M.; Cai, F., Tsang, A.S.L., Zhou, N. (2009).
Making Your Online Voice Loud: The Critical Role of
WOM Information. European Journal of Marketing,
45(7/8), pp.1277-1297.
Hur, W. M., Ahn, K. H., Kim, M. (2009). Building Brand
Loyalty through Managing Brand Community
Commitment. Management Decision, 49(7).
Jalilvand, M. R., Esfahani, S. S., Samiei, N. (2010).
Electronic word of mouth: challenges and
opportunities. Procedia Computer Science, 3, pp.42-
46.
Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., Chowdery, A. (2009).
Twitter Power: Tweets as Electronic Word of Mouth.
Journal of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology, 60(11), pp.2169-2188.
Jones, S. A., Aiken, K. D., Boush, D. M. (2009).
Integrating Experience, Advertising and Electronic
Word of Mouth. Journal of Internet Commerce. 8,
pp.246-267.
Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M. (2011a). Two heart in three
quarter time: How to waltz the social media/viral
marketing dance. Business Horizons. 54, pp.253-263.
Kaplan, A. M., Haenlein, M. (2011b). The early bird
catches the news: Nine things you should know about
micro-blogging. Business Horizons, 54, pp.105-113.
Keitzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., Mccarthy, I. P., Silvetre,
B. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding
functional building blocks of social media. Business
Horizons. 54, pp.241-251.
Kwon, E. S., Sung, Y. (2011). Follow Me! Global
Marketers’ Twitter Use. Journal of Interactive
Advertising. 12(1), pp. 4-16.
Nardi, B. A., Schiano, D. J., Gumbrecht, M., Swartz, L.
(2004). Why we blog. Communications of the ACM,
47(12), pp.41-46.
Parent, M., Plangger, K., Bal, A. (2011). The new WTP:
Willingness to participate. Business Horizons, 54,
pp.219.229.
WEBIST2012-8thInternationalConferenceonWebInformationSystemsandTechnologies
564