the project was to encourage students to complete
their thesis – one of the degree requirements.
It is important to mention that some of the
students had left the university 18 or 20 years ago,
some others live in remote areas of the country.
Thus, these students were unable to participate in a
face-to-face tutoring. In addition, our syllabi have
changed through the years; therefore, some students
lacked basic academic elements, such as the
knowledge of recent sociological theory.
The challenge was tremendous. Up to 75% of the
students from each promotion were potential
candidates for this project. It was difficult to know
what to expect regarding the acceptance of our
summons among students as well as the commitment
teachers would have towards this activity. Similar
projects in the past involving face-to-face tutoring
had different levels of success in terms of completed
thesis: high in 1994 near 85% of success, very poor
in 2005 with only two theses completed out of 45
students registered.
The program was promoted through the
university web page in September, 2011. The initial
acceptance was higher than expected. Over 100
students applied for the program. Over thirty
teachers were willing to participate as tutors.
The theses to be written were expected to be
short and simple. The student could choose,
according to their interests, between referring to a
professional experience or writing an essay or a
monographic description. The deadline for the
papers to be completed was set for March 30
th
, 2012.
Specifications of each kind of paper were submitted
on line.
The Moodle platform was selected because it is a
flexible learning environment that minimizes time
and space barriers and increases communicative
options by offering new alternatives for tutoring and
assessment. It would provide a restricted accessed
website where resources such as texts, videos and
multimedia would be offered. Users would log in
with a personal password. Students could submit
their assignments on required dates and teachers
could keep track of the progress of the students. In
addition instructors could formulate comments and
recommendations as well as provide new reading
material or suggest special tasks. The support
offered by instructors could be provided by e mail,
instant messaging, chats and discussion forums.
Online calendars and announcements were also
included.
UseofPlatform
byTutors
Used
NotUsed
3 THE EXPERIENCE
During the first week of the program, students and
teachers met and were notified of the virtual groups
they belonged to. During the second week, two
sessions were allocated to learning how to use
Moodle.
Those who attended the sessions discovered that
it was quite simple to operate and were motivated to
do their work through it. However, 50% of the
teachers and a considerable number of students
(40%) declined to use Moodle and decided to
communicate only by e-mail some showed a
preference for face-to-face activity. The most
frequently given reasons for not wanting to use
Moodle were: “I don´t have enough computer
skills”,” it is too impersonal”,” I don´t feel
comfortable with such a procedure” and so on.
UseofPlatform
byStudents
YES
NO
We are still waiting for the final results of the
project, but so far, they are not as encouraging as we
expected. From the very beginning, some students
refused idea to work only on line. Thus they
withdrew from the project and recovered their old
research project they had started many years ago.
Others begged to work in the old fashion way,
because, even if they work and find commuting to
the campus difficult, they prefer to interact closely
with tutors, in a face-to-face manner.
Most of the tutors belong to the category known
as digital immigrants; therefore, they only perform
CSEDU2012-4thInternationalConferenceonComputerSupportedEducation
188