![](bg7.png)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Cluster of Excellence “Energy-Efficient Prod-
uct and Process Innovation in Production Engineer-
ing” (eniPROD
c
) is funded by the European Union
(European Regional Development Fund) and the Free
State of Saxony.
REFERENCES
Ahl, V. (2005). An experimental comparison of five priori-
tization methods - investigating ease of use, accuracy
and scalability. Master’s thesis, Blekinge Institute of
Technology, Ronneby, Sweden.
Azani, H. and Khorramshahgol, R. (1990). Analytic Delphi
Method (ADM): A strategic decision making model
applied to location planning. Engineering Costs and
Production Economics, 20(1):23 – 28.
Azar, J., Smith, R., and Cordes, D. (2007). Value-oriented
requirements prioritization in a small development or-
ganization. Software, IEEE, 24(1):32 –37.
Boehm, B. (1979). Guidelines for verifying and validating
software requirements and design specifications. In
Proc. of European Conf. of Applied Information Tech-
nology, pages 711–719.
Duan, C., Laurent, P., Cleland-Huang, J., and Kwiatkowski,
C. (2009). Towards automated requirements pri-
oritization and triage. Requirements Engineering,
14(2):73–89.
Ehrlenspiel, K. (2009). Integrierte Produktentwick-
lung. Denkabl
¨
aufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenar-
beit. Hanser Fachbuch, 4th edition.
Forman, E. and Gass, S. (2001). The analytic hierarchy pro-
cess - an exposition. Operations Research, 49(4):469–
486.
Gumienny, R., Lindberg, T., and Meinel, C. (2011). Explor-
ing the synthesis of information in design processes -
opening the black-box. In Proc. of the 18th Int. Conf.
on Engineering Design (ICED2011), pages 446–455.
Harker, P. T. (1987). Incomplete pairwise comparisons in
the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Mod-
elling, 9(11):837 – 848.
Janis, I. (1989). Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policy-
making and Crisis Management. Free Press.
Jiang, L. and Eberlein, A. (2006). Analysis of require-
ments engineering techniques using clustering. In
Proc. of the 13th IEEE Int. Conf. on the Engineering
of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS 2006).
Karlsson, J., Olsson, S., and Ryan, K. (1997). Improved
practical support for large-scale requirements priori-
tising. Requirements Engineering, 2(1):51–60.
Karlsson, J. and Ryan, K. (1997). A cost-value approach for
prioritizing requirements. Software, IEEE, 14(5):67–
74.
Kruchten, P. (2003). Rational Unified Process: An Intro-
duction. Addison-Wesley Longman, Amsterdam.
McCarthy, K. (1992). Comment on the analytic del-
phi method. Int. Journal of Production Economics,
27(2):135–136.
Mead, N. (2008). Requirements prioritization introduction.
Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University, Soft-
ware Engineering Institute.
Mendoza, G. and Prabhu, R. (2009). Evaluating multi-
stakeholder perceptions of project impacts: a partic-
ipatory value-based multi-criteria approach. Int. Jour-
nal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology,
16(3):177–190.
Millet, I. and Harker, P. (1990). Globally effective ques-
tioning in the analytic hierarchy process. European
Journal of Operational Research, 48(1):88 – 97.
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., and Grote, K.-H. (2007).
Engineering Design. A Systematic Approach. Springer
London.
Perini, A., Ricca, F., and Susi, A. (2009). Tool-supported
requirements prioritization: Comparing the AHP and
CBRank methods. Information and Software Technol-
ogy, 51(6):1021 – 1032.
Ramanathan, R. (2001). A note on the use of the analytic hi-
erarchy process for environmental impact assessment.
Environmental Management, 63(1):27 – 35.
Regnell, B., Hst, M., och Dag, J., Beremark, P., and Hjelm,
T. (2001). An industrial case study on distributed pri-
oritisation in market-driven requirements engineering
for packaged software. Requirements Engineering,
6(1):51–62.
Reichel, T., R
¨
unger, G., Steger, D., and Xu, H. (2011). IT
support for the creation and validation of requirements
specifications - with a case study for energy efficiency.
In Proc. of the 18th Int. Conf. on Engineering Design
(ICED2011), volume 10, pages 167–177.
Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-
Hill, New York.
Schoner, B. and Wedley, W. (1989). Ambiguous criteria
weights in AHP: consequences and solutions. Deci-
sion Sciences, 20(3):462–475.
Shen, Y., Hoerl, A., and McConnell, W. (1992). An incom-
plete design in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathe-
matical and Computer Modelling, 16(5):121 – 129.
Suh, P. (2001). Axiomatic Design. Advances and Applica-
tions. Oxford University Press, New York.
VDI (1993). VDI 2221 - Systematic approach to the devel-
opment and design of technical systems and products.
Beuth Verlag Berlin.
VDI (2004). VDI 2206, Design methodology for mecha-
tronic systems. Beuth Verlag Berlin.
Wassermann, G. (1993). On how to prioritize design re-
quirements during the QFD planning process. IIE
Transactions, 25(3):59–65.
Wedley, W., Schoner, B., and Tang, T. (1993). Starting
rules for incomplete comparisons in the analytic hi-
erarchy process. Mathematical and Computer Mod-
elling, 17(4-5):93 – 100.
Weiss, E. and Rao, V. (1987). AHP design issues for large-
scale systems. Decision Sciences, 18(1):43–57.
Wiegers, K. (2003). Software Requirements. Microsoft
Press, 2nd edition.
ICEIS2012-14thInternationalConferenceonEnterpriseInformationSystems
76