intelligent tutoring system and, for the case of EM, a
set of five other systems: i) electronic mail; ii)
forums; iii) publicity in “banners”; iv) Web shops;
and v) hypermedia links allowing students to enter
sites where they can register themselves in an “opt-
in” model in order to receive information.
Results obtained by applying the practice field to
the teaching of EM are significant, which possibly
may be generalised to other fields of high
technological intensity. The motivational and
socializing aspects are still to be explored by
improving the intelligent tutoring system and the
interaction it promotes among elements of the
narrative.
This narrative may be further improved by
developing multimedia elements, like enhanced
video, integrated in the e-learning environment, or
by including virtual characters to embody narrative
in a simulated environment.
The study of this impact may conduct us to
important conclusions on the way these
technological devices may increase the efficiency of
the e-learning environment.
REFERENCES
Barab, S., Landa A., 1997. Designing effective interdisci-
plinary anchors. Educational Leadership 54(6), 52-55.
Barab, S., Duffy, T., 2000. From practice fields to
communities of practice. Theoretical foundation of
learning environments. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Barab, S., Duffy, T., Kenneth H., 1998. Grounded
constructions and how technology can help. CRLT
Technical Report no. 12-00.
Biggs, J., 2003. Aligning Teaching and Assessing to
Course Objectives. Teaching and Learning Education:
New Trends and Innovations. University of Aveiro,
13-17 April, 2003.
Brennan, R., 2003. One size doesn’t fit all – Pedagogy in
the online environment. NCVER, Adelaide.
Bundy A., 1998. Information Literacy: The Key
Competency for the 21st Century. IATUL Conference,
Pretoria, South Africa, volume 18.
Cashin, W.E., Downey, R.G., 1992. Using global student
rating items for summative evaluation. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 1992, 84(4), pp.563-572.
Conole, G., Thorpe M., Weller M., Wilson P., Nixon S.,
Grace P., 2007. Capturing practice and scaffolding
learning design. The open University, UK.
Dalziel. J, 2005. From reusable e-learning content to
reusable learning designs: Lessons from LAMS.
http://www.lamsfoundation.org, 2006.
Dickey, M., 2006. Game design narrative for learning:
approaching adventure game design narrative devices
and techniques for the design of interactive learning
environments. ETR&D, 54(3), 245-263.
Dowes, S., 2005. E-learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine.
Garde, S., Bauch, M., Haag, M., Heid, J., Huwendiek S.,
Ruderich, F., Singer, R., Leven, F., 2005. CAMPUS -
Computer based training in medicine as part of a
problem-oriented educational strategy. Studies in
LEID, 2(1), 10-19.
Govindasamy, T., 2002. Successful implementation of e-
learning. Pedadagogical considerations. Internet and
Higher Education 4, 287-299.
Floto C., Huk T., Lipper T., Steinke M., 2002. The role of
navigation and motivation in e-learning – the crimp-
approach within a swedish-german research
cooperation. In Procs of the EDEN Annual
Conference, Granada, Spain, 364-369.
Kofman F., Senge P., 1993. Communities of commitment:
the heart of learning organizations. Organizational
Dynamics 22(3)..
Law, N., Chow, A., Yuen, H.K., 2004. Methodological
approaches to comparing pedagogical innovations
using technology. Education and Information
Technologies, 10(1-2):7-20.
Lee G., 2009. E-learning Practice: A Framework for the
implementation of Online Learning. ANZMAC
conference.
Linder, J., 1990. Writing cases: tips and pointers. Harvard
Business School Press, 9-391-026, 1-9, Harvard
College, Boston USA.
Miller, R., Stace, R., Howell G., 2003. A developmental
approach to teaching internet marketing. Proceedings
of ANZMAC’2003, Adelaide, Australia.
Murray, T., 1999. Authoring intelligent tutoring systems:
an analysis of state of the art. International Journal of
Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 98–129.
Oliveira ED, Guimarães IC, 2010. Employability through
competencies and curricular innovation: a Portuguese
account. Faculty of Economics and Management,
Catholic University of Portugal.
Penna, M., Stara, V., 2007. The failure of e-learning: why
should we use a learner centred design. Journal of e-
Learning and Knowledge Society 3(2), pp. 127-135.
Romiszowski, A., 2004. How’s the E-learning Baby?
Factors Leading to Success or Failure of an
Educational Technology Innovation. Educational
Technology, 44(1), pp. 5–27.
De Wulf K., Schillewaert N., Van Vooren E., 2000.
Simulating the Principle of Database Marketing
through DARTS. Journal of Database Marketing. 7(3).
Wenger, E., 1987. Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring
System: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to
the Communication of Knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann
Publishers, California.
Winston L., Spiro M., 1998. Improving project
performance with simulation and practice. In the 29th
annual project management institute, seminars &
symposium. Long Beach, CA, USA.
APRACTICEFIELDFORTEACHINGELECTRONICMARKETING
489