[7], an early computer program playing a psychoanalyst role with which people
engaged in personal conversations involving quite deep feelings. Eliza had the
advantage of a very restricted field and style of conversation.
6.1 Future Work
Beyond the essential validation of the CyboPlayer design and assumptions, there are
several issues deserving future investigation.
First, what is the spectrum of algorithms for systematic generation of frequency
parameters. More sophisticated algorithms may provide the basis for online
learning/adaptation of the frequency parameters.
Another issue is the application of semantics in the determination of friends’
acquisition rates and community structures.
Improvement of the content related functions – say posting of comments – and
finally reaching chat capability will also be dealt in later stages of this research.
Finally, it should be interesting to generate a few instances of CyboPlayers that
will be able to interact among themselves and with human players in the social
network.
6.2 Main Contribution
The main contribution of this work is the usage of semantics to determine action
frequencies for the designed cyborg, to improve its immunity to Turing tests.
References
1. Boshmaf, Y., Muslukhov, I. Beznosov, K. and Ripeanu, M., “The Socialbot Network:
When Bots Socialize for Fame and Money”, in Proc. ACSAC’11, 2011.
2. Cha, M., Mislove, A. and Gummadi, K. A., “A measurement-driven analysis of information
propagation in the flickr social network”, in Proc. 18
th
International Conference on World
Wide Web, 2009.
3. Chu, Z., Gianvecchio, S., Wang, H. and Jajodia, S., “Who is Tweeting on Twitter: Human,
Bot or Cyborg?”, in Proc. ACSAC’10, pp. 21-30, 2010.
4. Gianvecchio, S., Xie, M., Wu, Z. and Wang, H.. “Measurement and classification of
humans and bots in internet chat”, In Proc. 17
th
USENIX Security Symposium, San Jose,
CA, 2008.
5. Newman, M. E. J., “Detecting community structure in networks”, Eur. Physical Journal, B,
Vol. 38, pp. 321–330, 2004.
6. Turing, A. M., “Computing machinery and intelligence”, Mind, Vol. 59, pp. 433–460,
1950.
7. Weizembaum, J., Computer Power and Human Reason, Freeman, San Francisco, USA,
1976.
8. Yan, J., 2006. “Bot, cyborg and automated turing test”, in Proc. 14
th
International
Workshop on Security Protocols, Cambridge.
84