Diabetic maculopathy and especially advanced
glaucoma are typical eye diseases causing central
scotoma. The damage inflicted by glaucoma is
related to optic nerve head, nerve fiber layer and
visual field. Too high intraocular pressure destroys
retinal fiber pathways leading to defects on the
visual field (scotomas) starting typically from the
peripheral visual field. It has been estimated that
glaucoma is one of the leading causes of blindness
together with diabetic eye disease. The risk of
having glaucoma increases significantly with age.
Some 60 million people worldwide suffer from the
disease, half of them unawares. Demographical
studies and screenings of population have shown
that especially open angle glaucoma patients have
not been detected by the opportunistic case finding
and there is lack of simple appropriate screening
methods (Wong, 2004).
One of the most common glaucoma diagnostic
test is perimetry, a visual field test, which produces
map of the visual field (Humphrey´s and Octopus
static perimetries and Goldmann´s kinetic
perimetry). These methods have been approved for
clinical studies, but they may not be suitable for
large screening of the population.
Our aim was to test the hypothesis and develop a
new method of collecting and analyzing eye
movement data in order to advance the development
of a new portable screening device for patients with
central scotoma patients.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Data Collection
Total of 12 voluntary subjects participated in the
experiment: six scotoma patients and six control
subjects. Two of the six scotoma patients were
diagnosed with Maculopahia Diabetica and four
patients were diagnosed with Glaucoma simplex.
The scotoma patients were recruited at routine
checkups at the University Hospital of Oulu. The
scotoma group included 4 male and 2 female
patients aged between 30 and 74 years, with the
mean 62.8 years.
The control group consisted of 3 male and 3
female students and faculty members of the
University of Oulu who were aged between 23-30
years with the mean 27.2 years.
The eye movements of the subjects were
recorded using a Tobii T120 Eye Tracker. Tobii
T120 records eye movements using an enhanced
version of the commonly used Pupil Centre Corneal
Reflection (PCCR) technique. The resolution of the
Tobii T120 tft-display, on which the Müller-Lyer
figure (M-L) was presented, was 1280x1024 pixels.
The line length of the presented M-L figure was 22.5
cm and the line thickness was 0.79 mm, see Fig. 1.
The M-L illusion figure consisted of a starting error
of 7.5 cm: the closed part of the figure was two
times longer than the open part of the figure. The
starting error was added in order to clearly show that
the line which was to be adjusted, with closed
arrowheads, was considerably longer than the line
with open arrowheads. The visual angle of the
presented M-L figure was 21.2 degrees (i.e. the
angle opening from the viewer towards the ends of
the line). The angle of the M-L figure arrow head
was 45 degrees and its length was 2cm. The sample
rate of the Tobii T120 Eye Tracker was 17 ms (60
Hz). The eye tracker was controlled by a laptop
computer. The M-L figure was presented on the eye
tracker screen by EMMI® software (LudoCraft Ltd,
Oulu, Finland).
Figure 1: Brentano version of the Müller-Lyer figure as
presented on screen. The closed side was adjusted.
The subject was sitting approximately 60 cm
from the Tobii T120 tft-monitor. A total of five right
pointing M-L figures were presented consecutively
on the screen using EMMI® software. The subject
was instructed to adjust M-L figure´s lines to be
equally long using the left and right arrow buttons of
a keyboard. After the adjustment of each M-L
figure, the subject had to press the enter-key.
2.2 Data Processing
Each Tobii T120 recording consists of a sequence of
triplets (t,x,y) following the eye movement
trajectory on the monitor, in which t is the
timestamp and x/y are the coordinates of a trajectory
point. These data points were further assigned to the
same fixation if the velocity remained below a
threshold of 30 degrees per second. In addition, the
maximum allowed time between fixations was set to
75 milliseconds and the maximum allowed angle
between fixations was set to 0.5 degrees; and the
minimum allowed fixation duration was set to 60
milliseconds.
EMMI® software recorded the participants’
BIOSIGNALS2013-InternationalConferenceonBio-inspiredSystemsandSignalProcessing
268