capable of describing the PRSA curves was defined.
HR was chosen as an indicative parameter of
neurological development because its variability is
regulated primarily by the ANS. Additionally, it can
be taken from the ECG, which needs fewer
electrodes than other techniques, such as
electroencephalography.
The PRSA method was selected because it is
proficient in condensing the signal into a shorter
sequence, keeping any relevant quasi-periodicities
but cancelling out all non-stationarities, artifacts,
and noise. Moreover, it is a very straightforward
algorithm which does not require a long
preprocessing of the raw data.
In order to achieve the goals of this work, two
types of PRSA investigations were developed in
parallel: the first looked at the acceleration and
deceleration on a beat-to-beat scale, the second one
on a 14 beats scale. This separation is due to the fact
that the two branches of the ANS, the sympathetic
and parasympathetic have shown to have different
time responses to external factors.
To quantify the difference among three groups of
babies, a few parameters were implemented: AAC,
ADC, SLOPE_A, SLOPE_D, AC and DC.
The last four revealed to be useful in PRSA
interpretation, since they are able to interpret to
which extent the heart is capable to increase or
decrease its beating rhythm from one beat to the next
one and how long it takes for this process to happen.
This is possible thanks to an analysis that focuses on
the beats just before and after the anchor point,
which identifies the moment of increase/decrease of
the signal. These parameters can be considered a
relevant first screening method to have a rapid idea
of the neurological condition of the patients,
indicating where it is necessary to run further
investigations.
The findings based on the PRSA technique were
also compared and validated using traditional time
domain HRV parameters. PRSA parameters proved
to be consistent with the traditional ones, having the
advantage of being less influenced by the noise or by
physiologic regulatory events and thus are more
robust and trustable. Additionally, the parameters
proposed provide complex information in one
number, taking into account the maximum range of
HRV and the time required for the heart to reached
the necessary HR. Moreover the possibility of
varying the two parameters L and T and the criterion
of choice of the AP, make this technique extremely
versatile.
To conclude, the PRSA technique revealed to be
an innovative and promising approach. Nonetheless
it is necessary to confirm our conclusion on a larger
population that will allow us to conduct statistical
analysis and to define threshold values for the
implemented parameters to distinct healthy and
underdeveloped infants.
REFERENCES
Rajendra Acharya U., Paul Joseph K.,Kannathal N., Choo
Min Lim, Suri Jasjit S., 2005. Heart rate variability:
a review
Bauer A., Kantelhardt J. W., Barthel P., Schneider R.,
Mäkikallio T., Ulm K., Hnatkova K., Schömig A.,
Huikuri H., Bunde A., Malik M., Schmidt G., 2006a.
Deceleration capacity of heart rate as a predictor of
mortality after myocardial infarction: cohort study,
The Lancet.
Pan J., Tompkins W. J., 1985. A Real-Time QRS Detection
Algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical
Engineering.
Huhn E. A., Lobmaier S., Fischer T., Schneider R., Bauer
A., Schneider K. T., Schmidt G., 2011. New
computerized fetal heart rate analysis for surveillance
of intrauterine growth restriction, University Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland,
Bauer A, Bunde A, Barthel P, Schneider R, Malik M,
Schmidt G., 2006b. Phase rectified signal averaging
detects quasi-periodicities in non-stationary data
Task Force of The European Society of Cardiology and
The North American Society of Pacing and
Electrophysiology, 1996. Heart rate variability,
Standards of measurement, physiological
interpretation, and clinical use, European Heart
Journal
BIOSIGNALS2013-InternationalConferenceonBio-inspiredSystemsandSignalProcessing
208