Figure 6: Control environment using the Electrostimulator defined in the configuration and session "protocol1".
the actuation of an electrostimulator, i.e. permits to
program stimulation protocols. Thus, creating a dy-
namic, flexible way of automate the actuation of stim-
uli.
Depending on the stakeholder the combination
Configuration-Control will change. Configuration
will be enabled, disabled or will have different levels
of restrictions. In the Control area different devices
and sessions will be programmed by default for a fast
approach by the user (setup the device then start/stop
the session). Ideally, the various envisioned users
should be consulted on whether they would be open
to use such a software package and, if so, under what
restrictions. Interviews or questionnaires will be suit-
able instruments for this. We hope this could be the
foundation for building a business model and further
develop ideas on how to penetrate the market.
We also provide a tool to generate dynamic con-
figurations, that are fast and simple to re-edited.
Therefore, if for example the configurations described
in this article are not optimized to configure a specific
electrostimulator we can easily optimized them.
With this powerful tool we provide a user-friendly
software solution with a multi-purpose platform for
sport, therapy and research.
REFERENCES
Cogan, S. (2008). Neural stimulation and recording elec-
trodes. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 10:275–309.
Costa, N., Araújo, T., Nunes, N., and Gamboa, H. (2012).
Knowledge acquisition system based on json schema
- implementation of a hci for actuation of biosignals
acquisition systems. In Cabello, E., Virvou, M., Obai-
dat, M. S., Caldeirinha, R. F. S., Ji, H., and Vergados,
D. D., editors, SIGMAP, pages 255–262. SciTePress.
Keller, T., Popovic, M., Pappas, I., and Müller, P. (2002).
Transcutaneous functional electrical stimulator “com-
pex motion”. Artificial organs, 26(3):219–223.
Malmivuo, J. and Plonsey, R. (1996). Bioelectromagnetism,
volume 34. Peter Peregrinus LTD.
Piccolino, M. (1998). Animal electricity and the birth of
electrophysiology: the legacy of luigi galvani. Brain
research bulletin, 46(5):381–407.
Siff, M. (1990). Applications of electrostimulation in phys-
ical conditioning: a review. The Journal of Strength &
Conditioning Research, 4(1):20.
Stoutemyer, D. (2012). Can the eureqa symbolic regres-
sion program, computer algebra and numerical analy-
sis help each other? Arxiv preprint arXiv:1203.1023.
Suter, B. A., O’Connor, T., Iyer, V., Petreanu, L. T., Hooks,
B. M., Kiritani, T., Svoboda, K., and Shepherd, G.
M. G. (2010). Ephus: multipurpose data acquisition
software for neuroscience experiments. Frontiers in
Neural Circuits, 4:100.
Von Lewinski, F., Hofer, S., Kaus, J., Merboldt, K.,
Rothkegel, H., Schweizer, R., Liebetanz, D., Frahm,
J., and Paulus, W. (2009). Efficacy of emg-triggered
electrical arm stimulation in chronic hemiparetic
stroke patients. Restorative Neurology and Neuro-
science, 27(3):189–197.
BIODEVICES2013-InternationalConferenceonBiomedicalElectronicsandDevices
230