shows the accuracy of the estimation process of the
rotation angle at the same structures.
From the previous two tables, increasing the
MDG size increases the number of cells and
decreases the range of angles within them as fewer
objects are held by each cell. However, this reduces
the accuracy of the process as more empty cells are
generated within the MDG and the rotation angle of
an incoming object can be misestimated in that case.
From the previous tables, the size of [7x7x7x7] with
a blurring level of 6 is the best for constructing the
MDG in stage 1.A where all the nonempty cells
have a maximum of 6 different angles and an
accuracy of 91.2% in estimating the rotation angle.
To reach a precision of 4 rotation angles within the
nonempty cells in stage 1.B, the MDG of size
[7x7x7x7] is used under blurring level 6. The
accuracy of estimating the rotation angle at this size
reached 94.2%.
Based on using MDGs of size [4x4x4] and
blurring level 6 in stage 2, the proposed algorithm
reached 97.2% in detecting different hand shapes
using 17 eigenvectors for the distance measure in
stage 3, where each objects needs 0.064 sec to be
classified. Figure 4 shows the effect of using
different numbers of eigenvectors in the third stage
on the accuracy of shape detection.
Figure 4: Accuracy versus different number of eigen-
vectors.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Gaussian blur can be used to reduce the nonlinearity
of the manifolds in PCA spaces. MDGs can divide
the space linearly for a set of blurred images into
cells that hold information from a training set of
computer-generated objects. At the best blurring
level and the best number of cells in the MDGs, the
proposed algorithm reached an accuracy of 97.2%
where each object needs 0.064 sec to be classified.
REFERENCES
D. Huang, W. Hu, S. Chang, and M. Chen, 2010. Gabor
filter-based hand-pose angle estimation for hand
gesture recognition under varying illumination. Expert
Systems With Applications, pp.6031–6042.
Shahrani Shahbudin, Aini Hussain, Hafizah Hussain,
Salina A.Samad, and Nooritawati Md. Tahir, 2010
Analysis of PCA Based Feature Vectors for SVM
Posture. 6th International Conference on
Classification. Signal Processing and Its Applications,
pp.1 – 6.
Giulia Gastaldi, Alessandro Pareschi, Silvio P. Sabatini,
Fabio Solari and Giacomo M. Bisio, 2005. A man-
machine communication system based on the visual
analysis of dynamic gestures. International
Conference on Image Processing, pp.397-400.
E. H. Adelson, C. H. Anderson, J. R. Bergen, P. J. Burt,
and J. M.Ogden, 1984. Pyramid methods in image
processing. RCA Engineer,pp. 33-41.
J. Yang, K. Yu, Y. Gong, and T. Huang, 2009. Linear
spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for
image classification, Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition, pp. 1794-1801.
David C. Zhang, Sek Chai, and Gooitzen Van der Wal,
2011. Method of Image Fusion and Enhancement
Using Mask Pyramid, 14th International Conference
on Information Fusion, pp. 1-8.
E. Schikuta, 1996. Grid-Clustering: A Fast Hierarchical
Clustering Method for Very Large Data Sets. 13th Int.
Conf. On Pattern Recognition, pp. 101-105.
Amineh Amini, Teh Ying Wah, Mahmoud Reza Saybani,
and Saeed Reza Aghabozorgi Sahaf Yazdi, 2011. A
study of density-grid based clustering algorithms on
data streams. 8th International Conference on Fuzzy
Systems and Knowledge Discovery, pp.1652-1656.
Inna Stainvas and Nathan Intrator, 2000. Blurred face
recognition via a hybrid network architecture. 15th
International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp.
805-808.
Z. Chen, S. Nie, L. Qian, and J. Xu, 2008. Automatic liver
segmentation method based on a gaussian blurring
technique for CT images. The 2nd International
Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical
ngineering, pp. 2516 - 2518.
NonlinearityReductionofManifoldsusingGaussianBlurforHandshapeRecognitionbasedonMulti-DimensionalGrids
307