![](bg6.png)
ent experiments. For instance, a generic evaluation of
user perception usually demands having a context or
a story the user can work with. Thus, having a tool
for the authoring of simple plots within a specialised
domain can enrich and facilitate the whole procedure.
In conclusion, a good alliance between ontologies
and storytelling has been already created, and it is our
task as researchers to enrich and improve it to make it
better and applicable to a larger number of fields.
REFERENCES
Arellano, D., Varona, J., and Perales, F. J. (2011). Why do i
feel like this?: The importance of context representa-
tion for emotion elicitation. International Journal of
Synthetic Emotions (IJSE), 2(2):28–47.
Benta, K.-I., Rar˘au, A., and Cremene, M. (2007). Ontology
based affective context representation. In Proceedings
of EATIS ’07, pages 46:1–46:9.
Chen, H., Perich, F., Finin, T., and Joshi, A. (2004). Soupa:
Standard ontology for ubiquitous and pervasive appli-
cations. In International Conference on Mobile and
Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, pages
258–267.
Chen, W., Hayashi, Y., Jin, L., Ikeda, M., and Mizoguchi,
R. (1998). An ontology-based intelligent authoring
tool. In Proc. of the Sixth International Conference on
Computers in Education, pages 41–49.
Damiano, R., Lombardo, V., and Pizzo, A. (2005). For-
mal encoding of drama ontology. In Proceedings of
ICVS’05, pages 95–104.
Dimitrova, V., Denaux, R., Hart, G., Dolbear, C., Holt, I.,
and Cohn, A. (2008). Involving domain experts in au-
thoring owl ontologies. In Proceedings of ISWC ’08,
pages 1–16.
Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., and
Schneider, L. (2002). Sweetening ontologies with
dolce. In Proceedings of EKAW ’02, pages 166–181.
Garc´ıa-Rojas, A., Vexo, F., Thalmann, D., Raouzaiou,
A., Karpouzis, K., Kollias, S., Moccozet, L., and
Magnenat-Thalmann, N. (2006). Emotional face ex-
pression profiles supported by virtual human ontol-
ogy. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 17(3-
4):259–269.
Heckmann, D., Schwartz, T., Brandherm, B., Schmitz, M.,
and von WilamowitzMoellendorff, M. (2005). Gumo:
The general user model ontology. User Modeling
2005, pages 428–432.
Konstantopoulos, S., Karkaletsis, V., and Bilidas, D. (2009).
An intelligent authoring environment for abstract se-
mantic representations of cultural object descriptions.
In Proceedings of LaTeCH-SHELT&R ’09, pages 10–
17.
Liebig, T. and Noppens, O. (2005). Ontotrack: A seman-
tic approach for ontology authoring. Web Semantics:
Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web,
3(2-3):116–131.
L´opez, J. M., Gil, R., Garc´ıa, R., Cearreta, I., and Garay, N.
(2008). Towards an ontology for describing emotions.
In Proceedings of WSKS ’08, pages 96–104.
Mizoguchi, R. and Ikeda, M. (1996). Towards ontology en-
gineering. Technical report, Osaka University, Japan.
M¨uller, V. M. (2011). An open source architecture for
building interactive dramas. In SBC - Proceedings of
SBGames 2011.
Nakasone, A. and Ishizuka, M. (2006). Storytelling ontol-
ogy model using rst. In Proceedings of IAT ’06, pages
163–169.
National Storytelling Network (n
˙
d). What is story-
telling? Retrieved from www.storynet.org/resources/
whatisstorytelling.html.
Niles, I. and Pease, A. (2001). Towards a standard upper
ontology. In Proceedings of FOIS ’01, pages 2–9.
Obrenovic, Z., Garay, N., Lpez, J., Fajardo, I., and Cear-
reta, I. (2005). An ontology for description of emo-
tional cues. In Tao, J., Tan, T., and Picard, R., edi-
tors, Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction,
volume 3784 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
pages 505–512.
Ortony, A., Clore, G., and Collins, A. (1988). The Cognitive
Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press.
Peinado, F. and Gerv´as, P. (2006). Evaluation of automatic
generation of basic stories. New Generation Comput-
ing, 24(3):289–302.
Peinado, F., Gerv´as, P., and D´ıaz-Agudo, B. (2004). A de-
scription logic ontology for fairy tale generation. In
Forth Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evalua-
tion: Workshop on Language Resources for Linguistic
Creativity, pages 56–61.
Schapp, R. (2009). Enhancing video game characters with
emotion, mood and personality. Master’s thesis, Delft
University of Technology.
Swartjes, I. (2010). Whose story is it anyway? How improv
informs agency and authorship of emergent narrative.
PhD thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
Swartjes, I. and Theune, M. (2009). Iterative authoring
using story generation feedback: debugging or co-
creation? In Second Joint International Conference
on Interactive Digital Storytelling, ICIDS 2009.
Third, A., Williams, S., and Power, R. (2011). Owl to en-
glish: a tool for generating organised easily-navigated
hypertexts from ontologies. In 10th International Se-
mantic Web Conference (ISWC2011), pages 23–27.
Williams, S. (2011). Generating mathematical word prob-
lems. In 2011 Association for the Advancement of Ar-
tificial Intelligence (AAAI) Fall Symposium on Ques-
tion Generation, pages 61–64.
OntologiesforAuthoring,orAuthoringOntologies?
369