implementation of a VLE or online learning for
these training programs is difficulty in getting
internet access services in remote areas such as
Sabah and Sarawak and the upstream side of the
village in the peninsula. The instructors’ opinions
were that any kind of system could be implemented
but it would require a longer time to familiarize
trainees to internalize the system due to the attitude
and skills or weaknesses in the trainees themselves
in terms of adopting these technologies. Principals
also stated that in order to implement the reforms,
many things need to be considered by various
parties, such as time, cost and manpower. All of
which has to be approved by various levels of
meetings with stakeholders. In addition, the system
development process also requires review and
comprehensive study to produce a system that really
functions and satisfies the end user. Therefore, these
constraints should be considered before making the
decision to implement e-learning. These are
summarized as follows: (1)The supply of hardware
resources such as computer equipment, internet,
network, servers and other hardware involved in
every centre that participates; (2)The provision of
software and applications must be easy to develop
and maintain as well as low in cost if licensed; (3)
Intensive training to trainees and all institutional
personnel or departments which will be involved
with the system; (4) Moral and financial support
from the stakeholders and management; and (5)
Costs like resources, manpower and time periods
should be considered from the beginning of a
process of planning, implementation, testing up to
the assessment of effectiveness.
7 CONCLUSIONS
This paper has presented proposed changes to the
current evaluation model in Malaysia Skills Training
Diploma to a new CBT blended assessment model
which adopts the concept of an e-portfolio. This e-
portfolio system has received positive feedback from
various groups such as senior officers at the
ministry, principals and instructors of the training
institutes. Numerous people have proposed that there
may be advantages to the student like time and cost
saving, enhancing student’s active learning and
giving students access to the latest learning
technology. Although there are several constraints
that need to be addressed and taken into account
such as the high cost of short and long term
investment for the facilities and equipment, lack of
student’s and instructor’s awareness as well as the
political intervention, these people believed that the
new model would be of benefit and successful.
Proposals to develop e-portfolios have full support
from all parties involved with the Skills Training
program in Malaysia. This system will hopefully
help the trainees to be more reflective in their
training and deepen the objectives of their courses.
REFERENCES
Abd Aziz, A. S., & Haron, M. H. (2012). Personal
Communication. Sept 2012. Kuantan, Pahang,
Malaysia.
Abrami, P. C., Wade, C. A., Pillay, V., Aslan, O., Bures,
E. M., & Bentley, C. (2008). Encouraging self-
regulated learning through electronic portfolios.
Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology.
Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/
article/view/507/238
Barrett, H. C. (2005). Researching Electronic Portfolios
and Learner Engagement. October.
Bastiaens, T. (2010). Competency-based education in an
electronic- supported environment : an example from a
distance teaching university Markus Deimann and.
International Jurnal Cont. Engineering Education and
Life Long Learning, 20, 278–289.
Dollah, M. N., Saedon, M. A., Taja Arifin, H., Abd Razak,
M. L., Rakon, Z., & Abd Hamid, N. (2012). Personal
Communication. Sept 2012. Putrajaya: Department Of
Skills Development, Malaysia.
Gerbic, P., & Maher, M. (2008). Collaborative self-study
supporting new technology: The Mahara e-portfolio
project. Hello Where are you in the landscape of
educational technology Proceedings ascilite
Melbourne 2008, (2005), 320–324. Retrieved from
http://www.edna.edu.au/edna/referral/advsearch/http://
www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/g
erbic.pdf
Hager, Paul, Gonczi, Andrew and Athanasou, James
(1994): General issues about assessment of
competence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher
Education, 02602938, Apr94, Vol. 19, Issue 1.
Hallam, G. (2008). The Australian ePortfolio project and
the opportunities to develop a community of practice,
368–372.
Lorenzo, G., Ittelson, J., & Oblinger, D. (2005).
Demonstrating and Assessing Student Learning with
E-Portfolio. (D. Oblinger, Ed.)ELI Paper 32005.
Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/
pdf/ELI3003.pdf
Madden, T. (2007). Development , Adaptation and
Implementation of the e-Portfolio Framework.
October.
NVTC. (2001). Government Circular :National skill
certification in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: NVTC.
Queirós, R., Oliveira, L., Leal, J. P., Moreira, F., Inesc-
porto, C., & Ipp, K. E. (2011). Integration of
TheDevelopmentofane-PortfolioforCompetencybasedTrainingAssessmentforaMalaysianSkillsDiplomaProgram
391