3 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS
AND CONCLUSIONS
The aim of this section is to show our experience in
the use of these materials in the subject “Statistics”
of the Physiotherapy Degree during the last
academic year 2011-2012.
During this academic year, the above described
materials were used to evaluate the part of the
assessment system corresponding to computer
practices which supposes a 30% of the final mark of
the student. With this methodology, the 70% of
students joined in the subject “Statistics” passed the
practices evaluation with a good mark.
Unfortunately, there is not any historical data for
comparison but it can be considered a satisfactory
percentage, taking into account the difficulty that
Statistical issues suppose for these students.
Furthermore, to evaluate the elaborated materials
and their utility in the evaluation process, students
were proposed to respond a survey created in the
ILIAS platform with question related to the
computer practices and their evaluation.
This survey was initially proposed to all students
joined to this course, i.e., over a whole of 81
students, but it was voluntarily filled out by 47 of
them. This fact supposes a participation percentage
of about 50.6%.
The items of this survey were structured in three
blocks related to:
1. the computer practices
2. the self-evaluation tests
3. the evaluation test for the computer practices
exam
Students might value each item with a mark from 1
(completely disagree) to 4 (completely agree).
The best valued items, with modal value of 4, were:
Computer practices fit with the theory.
The used software is accessible, user-friendly,
work environment, etc.
Computer practices have helped me to
understand the statistical concepts.
The questions in self-evaluation tests are
appropriated for the computer practice
developed.
The type of test is easy and comfortable to use
from the ILIAS platform
Questions in the evaluation test are adapted to
the computer practices solved during the sessions
and the self-evaluation tests.
On the other hand, the worst valued items, with a
modal value of 2 were two specific questions:
Clarity of some questions and lack of ambiguity.
Data used in computer practices are of interest in
the Physiotherapy field.
With respect to the first of these items we must
say that although this answer can be motivated by
the formulation of questions which motivate the
statistical reasoning, we think that they should be
revised in order to avoid any confusion.
On the other hand, the second issue highlights
that the exhaustive seeking of examples in the
Health Sciences environment has been insufficient
and unsatisfactory for the interests of our students
and a major effort should be done in this sense.
From students’ opinion, our general evaluation
of this experience is very positive. Moreover, we
would like to emphasize the generality of the
learning material presented here which can be used
as a learning support in many other compatible
subjects with basic statistics contents.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This paper has been supported by the Learning
Innovation Project PID46_201113.
REFERENCES
Bissa, G.; Sharma, A., 2010. Teaching learning process. A
study with spaecial reference non verbal
communication. International Research Journal, 1(6),
pp. 57-61.
Caballero, R.; Fernández, R. M., Jiménez, J. D., Martínez,
A. M., Olmo, M. J., Oya, A., Saez, A. J., 2005.
Creación de material docente online de apoyo a la
docencia de Estadística Descriptiva. Jornadas de
adaptación del profesorado universitario al Espacio
Europeo de Educación Superior mediante el uso de
nuevas tecnologías, Jaén (Spain).
Craig, A., Coldwell-Neilson, J., Goold, A., Beekhuyzen,
J., 2012. A review of e-learning technologies.In
CSEDU2012, 4
th
International Conference on
Computer Supported Education.
Godino, J. D. (1995). ¿Qué aportan los ordenadores a la
enseñanza y aprendizaje de la estadística?.
http://www.ugr.es/~batanero/ARTICULOS/ORDENA
.htm.
Jiménez, J.D.,Martínez, A. M., Olmo, M. J., Oya, A.,
Caballero, R., Fernández, R.M., 2011. Evaluation
tools in virtual teaching. In INTED2011. International
Technology, Education and Development Conference.
Jolliffe, A., Ritter, J., Stevens, D., 2001. The online
learning handbook. Kogan Page. London.
Martínez, A. M., Olmo, M. J., Oya, A., Caballero, R.,
CSEDU2013-5thInternationalConferenceonComputerSupportedEducation
252