6 CONCLUSIONS
Data mining tools have been applied to ACSC data.
The resulting predictions have identified both, areas
and groups that need attention and those that are
headed in a positive direction. Because of the
inconsistent nature of health-related data, these
trends are more reliable when data is aggregated.
Despite this limitation, improvements to the health
care system can be targeted towards high-impact
locations and critical demographic groups identified
by our predictive models. COPD and Diabetes
diagnosis groupings appear to be on the rise and
require additional health care focus. Conversely,
population such as the 70-75 age group may be
receiving adequate treatment thus decreasing the
morbidity of these cases. Visualizations methods
provide a clear and easy to understand interface for
correctly distinguishing factual existing data and
predicted/forecasted data. The reporting tools offer
drill-down capabilities for further insight into any
desired set of existing and forecasted information
over specified time ranges. The models developed
offer a strong confidence level where stable
forecasting of ACSC-related health data is possible.
The SSAS environment was confirmed as an
effective means of creating forecasting models for
the ACSC data by observing similar results with R.
As a result, SSAS was deemed a beneficial tool for
creating a data mining solution for ACSC as it
simplified the task of designing mining structures
and models without the need for statistics expertise.
The reporting is also more intuitive and interactive.
The tight integration with the existing analytics cube
further centralized the task of data mining and
incorporation of new data into the data warehouse.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was funded by Northern Health, BC
under the Innovation & Development Commons
Program. The authors extend their sincere
appreciation for the support and guidance provided
by Michel Aka and Dr. Bill Clifford of Northern
Health in access/interpretation of data, validation of
results and completion of this research.
REFERENCES
Akinbami, L. J. & Schoendorf, K. C., 2002. Trends in
Childhood Asthma: Prevalence, Health Care
Utilization, and Mortality. Pediatrics, 1 August,
110(2), pp. 315-322.
Barao, S. M. M., 2008. Linear and Non-Linear Time
Series Analysis: Forecasting Financial Markets, s.l.:
Instituto Superior de Ciencias do Trabalho e da
Empresa.
Booth, G. L., Hux, J. E., Fang, J. & Chan, B. T., 2005.
Time Trends and Geographic Disparities in Acute
Complications of Diabetes in Ontario, Canada.
Diabetes Care, May, 28(5), pp. 1045-1050.
Brown, A. et al., 2001. Hospitalization for Ambulatory
Care-Sensitive Conditions: A Method for Comparative
Access and Quality Studies Using Routinely Collected
Statistics. Canadian Journal of Public Health, April,
92(2), pp. 155-159.
Caminal, J. et al., 2004. The role of primary care in
preventing ambulatory care sensitive conditions.
Public Health, 14(3), pp. 246-251.
Gentleman, R., Ihaka, R. & et. al., 2012. The R Project for
Statistical Computing. [Online]
Available at: http://www.r-project.org/
[Accessed 12 November 2012].
Haque, W. & Edwards, J., 2012. Ambulatory Care
Sensitive Conditions: A Business Intelligence
Perspective. York, Canada, s.n., pp. 31-39.
Lieu, T. A., Newacheck, P. W. & McManus, M. A., 1993.
Race, ethnicity, and access to ambulatory care among
US adolescents. American Journal of Public Health,
July, 83(7), pp. 960-965.
Microsoft Corp, 2013. Business Intelligence. [Online]
Available at: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/bi/
MSDN, 2012. Microsoft Time Series Algorithm Technical
Reference. [Online]
Available at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-
us/library/bb677216.aspx
[Accessed 7 September 2012].
Oster, A. & Bindman, A., 2003. Emergency Department
Visits for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions:
Insights into Preventable Hospitalizations. Medical
Care, 41(2), pp. 198-207.
Parker, J. D. & Schoendorf, K. C., 2000. Variation in
Hospital Discharges for Ambulatory Care-Sensitive
Conditions Among Children. Pediatrics, 1 October,
106(3), pp. 942-948.
Roos, L., Walld, R., Uhanova, J. & Bond, R., 2005.
Physician Visits, Hospitalizations, and Socioeconomic
Status: Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions in a
Canadian Setting. HSR: Health Services Research,
August, 40(4), pp. 1167-1185.
Schrieber, S. & Zielinski, T., 1997. The Meaning of
Ambulatory Care Sensitive Admissions: Urban and
Rural Perspectives. The Journal of Rural Health,
13(4), pp. 276-284.
Starfield, B., Weiner, J., Mumford, L. & Steinwachs, D.,
1991. Ambulatory care groups: a categorization of
diagnoses for research and management. Health
Services Research, 26(1), pp. 53-74.
PredictingCasesofAmbulatoryCareSensitiveConditions
79