![](bg6.png)
Research: Developing Design Theory for IS
Integration Management. Information Systems and E-
Business Management, 9(1), 109–131.
Chmielewicz, K. (1994). Forschungskonzeption der
Wirtschaftswissenschaft. Stuttgart, DE: Poeschel.
David, P. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.
The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.
Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the Virtual State:
Information Technology and Institutional Change.
Washington, DC, USA: Brookings Institution Press.
Frank, U. (2006). Towards a Pluralistic Conception of
Research Methods in Information Systems Research.
ICB Research Report (No. 7).Essen, DE.
Frank, U. (2009). Die Konstruktion möglicher Welten als
Chance und Herausforderung der Wirtschaftsinfor-
matik. In J. Becker, H. Krcmar & B. Niehaves (Eds.),
Wissenschaftstheorie und gestaltungsorientierte WI
(pp. 161–173). Heidelberg: Physica.
Frank, U. (2010). Zur methodischen Fundierung der For-
schung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik. In H.Österle, R.
Winter & W. Brenner (Eds) Gestaltungsorientierte
Wirtschaftsinformatik (pp. 35-44). Nuermberg, DE:
Infowerk.
Gregor, S. (2009). Building Theory in the Sciences of the
Artifical. In Proceedings of DESRIST’09 (pp. 1–10).
New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.
Gregor, S. & Jones, D. (2007). The Anatomy of a Design
Theory. JAIS, 8(5), 312–335.
Habermas, J. (1987). Reason and the Rationalization of
Society: Theory of Communicative Action. Frankfurt
am Main, DE: Suhrkamp (German).
Hevner, A. R. (2007). The Three-Cycle View of Design
Science Research. SJIS, 19(2), 87–92.
Hevner, A. R., & Chatterjee, S. (2010). Design Research
in Information Systems: Theory and Practice. New
York, NY, USA: Springer.
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004).
Design Science in Information System Research. MIS
Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
Iivari, J. (2007). A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information
Systems as a Design Science. SJIS, 19(2), 39–64.
Iivari, J. (2010). Twelve Theses on Design Science
Research in Information Systems. In A. R. Hevner &
S. Chatterjee (Eds.), Design Research in Information
Systems (pp. 43–62). New York, NY, USA: Springer.
Kuechler, W. L., & Vaishnavi, V. (2012a). A Framework
for Theory Development in Design Science Research:
Multiple Perspectives. JAIS, 13(6), 395–423.
Kuechler, W. L., & Vaishnavi, V. (2012b). Characterizing
Design Science Theories by Level of Constraint on
Design Decisions. In K. Peffers, M. A. Rothenberger
& B. Kuechler (Eds.), Proceedings DESRIST’12, Las
Vegas, NV, USA, May 14-15, 2012. (pp. 345–353).
Berlin, DE: Springer.
Ladyman, J. (2007). Ontological, Epistemological and
Methodological Positions. In T. Kuipers (Ed.),
Handbook of Philosophy of Science (pp. 303–376).
Oxford, UK: North Holland.
Lewis, D. K. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford,
UK: Blackwell.
March, S. T., & Vogus, T. J. (2010). Design Science in the
Management Discipline. In A. R. Hevner & S.
Chatterjee (Eds.), Design Research in Information
Systems (pp. 195–208). New York: Springer.
Mertens, P. (2010). Anspruchsgruppen der gestaltungs-
orientierten WI. In H.Österle, R. Winter & W. Brenner
(Eds.) Gestaltungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik
(pp. 19–25). Nuremberg: Infowerk.
Myers, M. D. & Klein, H. K. (2011). A Set of Principles
for Conducting Critical Research in Information
Systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 17–36.
Niehaves, B. (2007). On Epistemological Pluralism in
Design Science. SJIS, 19(2), 93–104.
Niiniluoto, I. (1993). The Aim and Structure of Applied
Research. Erkenntnis, 38(1), 1–21.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and
Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Nunamaker, J. F., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. D. M. (1991).
Systems Development in Information Systems
Research. JMIS, 7(3), 89–106.
Österle, H., Winter, R., & Brenner, W. (Eds.). (2010).
Nuernberg, DE: Inforwerk,
Österle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., ... Sinz, E. J.
(2011). Memorandum on Design-oriented Information
Systems Research. EJIS, 20(1), 7–10.
Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist
Perspective. London, UK: Sage.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation.
London, UK: Sage.
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., &
Chatterjee, S. (2008). A Design Science Research
Methodology for Information Systems Research.
JMIS, 24(3), 45–77.
Popper, K. P. (1967). The Spell of Plato: The Open
Society and Its Enemies. London, UK: Routledge.
Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Sein, M. K. (2010). On Integrating
Action Research and Design Research. In A. R.
Hevner & S. Chatterjee (Eds.), Design Research in
Information Systems (pp. 179–194). New York, NY,
USA: Springer.
Riege, C., Saat, J., & Bucher, T. (2009). Systematisierung
von Evaluationsmethoden in der gestaltungs-
orientierten Wirtschaftsinformatik. In J. Becker, H.
Krcmar & B. Niehaves (Eds.), Wissenschaftstheorie
und gestaltungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik (pp.
69–86). Heidelberg, DE: Physica.
Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research: A Resource for
Social Scientists and Practitioner Researchers.
Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell.
Rossi, M., & Sein, M. K. (2003). Design Research
Workshop: A Proactive Research Approach. 26th
Information Systems Research Seminar in
Scandinavia, August 9-12, 2003, Haikko, FI.
Sein, M., Rossi, M., & Purao, S. (2007). Exploring the
Limits of the Possible. SJIS, 19(2), 105–110.
Stahl, B. C. (2009). The Ideology of Design: A Critical
Appreciation of the Design Science Discourse in
Information Systems and Wirtschaftsinformatik. In J.
Becker, H. Krcmar & B. Niehaves (Eds.), Wissen-
ICEIS2013-15thInternationalConferenceonEnterpriseInformationSystems
344