Analytics among worldwide companies is still at the
beginning in the academic world, so due to these
reasons, this paper aim to provide a diagnosis of
how this matter is being treated in the academic
environment.
The scientometric (Raan, 1997) was applied
taking into account some indicators related to a
general bibliometric research, including the number
of papers per year, the journals where such
publications occurred, the nationality of the main
authors, the number of participants per article, the
impact factors and a citation analysis.
In addition, an analysis was done in the
perspective of the content of the selected papers,
regarding the context of the papers (Business or
Technology environment), the academic or non-
academic orientation of the publication (Business,
IT), and the relationship of BA with other constructs
(e.g. decision-making process, strategy, BI, supply
chain, planning and others) as well as the
methodology applied in each empirical work (e.g.
case studies, survey, conceptual articles, multiple
methods).
2 PUBLICATIONS ABOUT
BUSINESS ANALYTICS
There are no doubts that publications on BA topics
have become more common in both management
and IT magazines. The most important moment of
BA literature occurred when it acquired more
visibility through the publication of Davenport’s
paper “Competing on Analytics” in the Harvard
Business Review. Later on in a book, (Davenport
and Harris, 2007) additionally described BA as the
extensive use of data, statistical and quantitative
analysis, explanatory and predictive models, and
fact-based management to drive decisions and
actions.
(Davenport and Harris, 2007) proposed that
companies must consider two distinct domains
regarding BA: i) Internal Analytics: Financial,
Manufacturing, Research & development, Human
Resources; and ii) External Analytics: Customer and
Supplier. In order to approach such domains,
companies must “get the data in shape” preparing
large amounts of high-quality data to build
prosperous analytical environments. Analytical
competition requires a clear business strategy in
which executives should consider what key
processes and strategic initiatives would be
advanced based on the right analytics.
Besides Davenport’s publications, there are some
relevant papers that should be highlighted. (Oliveira
et al., 2012), in the paper Business analytics in
supply chains – The contingent effect of business
process maturity, analyzes the effect of the use of
business analytics on supply chain performance,
investigating the changing information processing
needs at different supply chain process maturity
levels.
Another relevant publication is The impact of
business analytics on supply chain performance by
(Trkman et al., 2010) that analyze the relationship
between analytical capabilities in the plan, source,
make and deliver area of supply chains and their
impact on organizational performance, taking
information system support and business process
orientation as moderators. The authors conclude that
the moderation effect of information systems
support is stronger than the effect of business
process orientation, highlighting the importance of a
company's use of its databases, explicative and
predictive models and fact-based management to
drive its decisions.
Another relevant paper that provides a new
perspective of BA is The Talent and analytics: new
approaches, higher ROI (Jeanne et al., 2011). In this
paper, authors correlate BA to Human Resources
processes and propose one ladder of analytical HR
applications. In this sense, some approaches have
more impact than others, and can be envisioned as a
ladder of analytical sophistication.
Additionally, the paper Integrating business
analytics into strategic planning (Klatt et al., 2011)
provided a relevant contribution by showing that the
effective use of business analytics is achieved by
combining three different application perspectives: i)
the IT Based applications; ii) the management
accounting applications; and iii) the analytical
methods applications.
More recently, it can also be cited a paper
developed by (Loukis et al., 2012) entitled
Transforming e-services evaluation data into
business analytics using value models Transforming
e-services evaluation data into business analytics
using value models. In this paper the authors
emphasize how the websites have been evaluating
large amounts of data nowadays, suggesting that
transforming these data into useful business
analytics requires a better understanding of the
strengths and weaknesses of the e-service, providing
guidance for its improvement and optimization. The
authors propose and validate a methodology for
transforming user evaluation data into useful
business analytics and define value model for e-
KDIR2013-InternationalConferenceonKnowledgeDiscoveryandInformationRetrieval
548