Learning on Electrical Circuits While Playing ‘E&E Electrical Endeavours’ - Design Research on a Serious Game Optimizing for Conceptual Understanding

Ruurd Taconis, Mariette Dubois, Lesley de Putter, Henry van Bergen

2014

Abstract

A serious game was developed in a two year design research project by educational researchers, game-designers and secondary school teachers in close collaboration. In a first round, students played the game in class using an open-inquiry strategy. Although the game had a strong impact on the students’ conceptual development, it provoked the construction of misconceptions. The game was adapted and partially redesigned on the basis of the evaluation outcomes and an additional expert-review. Also the instructions to the game were redesigned and written down in a teachers’ guide. In a second round, a pedagogical approach of alternating open-inquiry type gaming-episodes with guided reflection and internalisation episodes was used in class. Again a strong impact on students’ conceptual understanding of electrical circuits was found. Significantly fewer misconceptions occurred. The results indicate that the close collaboration of school teachers, educational experts and game designers was fruitful for improving the serious game and its use in school practice. Moreover it became clear that serious games have the potential to contribute to students’ conceptual understanding, in particular when a suitable mental model is coherently represented in the game´s layout and structure.

References

  1. Anderson, B. (1986). The experiential gestalt of causation: a common core to pupils' preconceptions in science. European journal of science education, 8, 155-171.
  2. Csikszentmihaly, M. (2009). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. HarperCollins, New York.
  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(2000). Das Flow-Erlebnis. Jenseits von Angst und Langeweile: im Tun aufgehen [Beyond boredom and anxiety] (8th. Ed.).Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta.
  4. Dekker, J., Jacobs, A., van Hensberg, V. (2010). Informal user test of E&E electrical endeavours. Internal report.
  5. Dreyfus, S., E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (February 1980). A FiveStage Model of the Mental Activities Involved. In Directed Skill Acquisition. Washington, DC: Storming Media. Retrieved June 13, 2010. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA08 4551&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf.
  6. Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography STCSE: Students' and teachers' conceptions and science education. http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse. html. Accessed 20 April 2009.
  7. Duit, R., & Schecker, H. (2007). Teaching Physics. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 599-629). New York: Routledge.
  8. Duit, R., & Von Rhoeneck, C. (1998). Learning and understanding key concepts of electricity. In A.Tiberghien, E. Leonard Jossem, & J. Barojas (Eds.), Connecting research in physics education with teacher education. International Commission on Physics Education.
  9. Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students' understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98-115.
  10. Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design Research from a Learning Design Perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research. London: Routledge.
  11. Hart, C. (2008). Models in physics, models for physics learning, and why the distinction may matter in the case of electric circuits. Research in Science Education, 38, 529-544.
  12. Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., & Veermans, K. (2010). A comparison of students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulationlaboratory contexts. Journal of research in science teaching. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10. 1002/tea.20386/pdf.
  13. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and InquiryBased Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75- 86. http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/fss/2006-1214 - 211848/kirschner_06_minimal _guidance.pdf.
  14. Kock, Z. D. Q. P., Taconis, R., Bolhuis, S. M & Gravemeijer, K.P.E. (2013). Some key Issues in creating inquiry-based instructional practices that aim at the understanding of simple electric circuits. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 579-597.
  15. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  16. Koops, M. C. & Hoevenaar, M. (2012). Conceptual Change During a Serious Game: Using a Lemniscate Model to Compare Strategies in a Physics Game. Simulation & Gaming. http://sag.sagepub.com/ content/early/2012/09/23/1046878112459261.abstract.
  17. Michael, D., & Chen, S. (2006). Serious games: Games that educate, train and inform. Thomson: Boston, MA.
  18. Mulhall, P., McKittrick, B., & Gunstone, R. (2001). A perspective on the resolution of confusions in the teaching of electricity. Research in Science Education, 31, 575-587.
  19. Ruben, B. D. (1999). Simulations, games, and experiencebased learning: The quest for a new paradigm for teaching and learning. Simulation & Gaming, 30(4), 498-505.
  20. Shipstone, D. (1985). Electricity in Simple Circuits. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children' s ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  21. Taber, K. S., de Trafford, T., & Quail, T. (2006). Conceptual resources for constructing the concepts of electricity: the role of models, analogies and imagination. Physics Education, 41(2), 155-160.
  22. Vockell, E.L. (2013). Educational Psychology: A Practical Approach. Chapter 6. Retreived from Perdue University sept. 2013http://education. purduecal. edu/Vockell/EdPsyBook/Edpsy6/edpsy6_transfer.htm.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Taconis R., Dubois M., de Putter L. and van Bergen H. (2014). Learning on Electrical Circuits While Playing ‘E&E Electrical Endeavours’ - Design Research on a Serious Game Optimizing for Conceptual Understanding . In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-021-5, pages 5-13. DOI: 10.5220/0004793200050013


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu14,
author={Ruurd Taconis and Mariette Dubois and Lesley de Putter and Henry van Bergen},
title={Learning on Electrical Circuits While Playing ‘E&E Electrical Endeavours’ - Design Research on a Serious Game Optimizing for Conceptual Understanding},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},
year={2014},
pages={5-13},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004793200050013},
isbn={978-989-758-021-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
TI - Learning on Electrical Circuits While Playing ‘E&E Electrical Endeavours’ - Design Research on a Serious Game Optimizing for Conceptual Understanding
SN - 978-989-758-021-5
AU - Taconis R.
AU - Dubois M.
AU - de Putter L.
AU - van Bergen H.
PY - 2014
SP - 5
EP - 13
DO - 10.5220/0004793200050013