vation to conclude how far the training in the virtual
environment could increase their motivation. To il-
lustrate the influence of the training with CordiAAL
we have taken two aspects into account. The moti-
vation for doing sports with and without any general
technical aids, and the same with CordiAAL as a spe-
cific technical aid. Figure 16 clearly illustrates that
the subjects have difficulty doing sustainable sporting
activities and also the willingness of using aids is low.
In turn, the increasing motivation through the virtual
training is clearly evident. An increased value for the
readiness to use CordiAAL as a technical aid for reg-
ular sport activities was also indicated. The most im-
portant motivation factor was thereby the training in a
virtual group. It was stated that the training and com-
munication with other group members minimize the
effort of training and increase the ambition.
Figure 16: Evaluation of the questions of motivation and
willingness to use the aids, divided according to data ob-
tained from the self-assessment and evaluation after training
with CordiAAL.
7 CONCLUSIONS
The user study clearly demonstrates that the main ob-
jectives of the CordiAAL system were achieved, real-
izing a playfully ergometer training which motivates
users to a regular physical activity, bringing users
with different fitness levels together and to give them
safety at the same time.
This is done by a permanent monitoring of vital
data and an adjustment of the ergometer load based
on these data. Since the study was not conducted
with subjects with heart disease, for ethical reasons,
the question of the decrease of anxiety remains open.
The next stage in the evaluation would be a long-
term study to check if the motivation stays high-
leveled in a long-term use.
REFERENCES
Anderson, F., Annett, M., and Bischof, W. F. (2010). An-
nual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine 2010.
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics.
Balady, G., Williams, M., Ades, P., Bittner, V., Comoss, P.,
Foody, J., Franklin, B., Sanderson, B., and Southard,
D. (2007). Core components of cardiac rehabili-
tation/secondary prevention programs. Circulation,
115(20):2675–82.
Bjarnason-Wehrens, B., Held, K., and Karoff, M. (2006).
Herzgruppen in Deutschland: Status quo und Perspek-
tiven. Herz, 31:559–565.
Bjarnason.Wehrens, B., Drsch, M., Gielen, S., Halle, M.,
Hambrecht, R., and Kindermann, W. (2009). Leitlinie
krperliche aktivitt zur sekundrprvention und therapie
kardiovaskulrer erkrankungen. Clinical Research in
Cardiology Supplement (CRICS), pages 1–44.
Borg, G. (1970). Perceived exertion as an indicator of so-
matic stress. Scandinavian journal of Rehabilitation
Medicine, 2:92–98.
Boulos, M. N. K. and Yang, S. P. (2013). Exergames for
health and fitness: the roles of GPS and geosocial
apps. Technical report, International Journal of Health
Geographics.
Busch, C., Litvina, A., and Willemsen, D. (2009). Kar-
diale Telerehabilitation auf Basis einer flexiblen Platt-
form f
¨
ur verteilte Systeme - das OSAmI-D Projekt.
e-Health, pages 218–221.
Caprani, N., O’Connor, N. E., and Gurrin, C. (2012). Touch
Screens for the Older User. In Cheein, D. F. A., editor,
Assistive Technologies, chapter 5. InTech.
Dohndorf, O., G
¨
oring, A., Krumm, H., Schneider, A., Som-
mer, A., Sladek, S., Busch, C., Hoffmann, J.-D., and
Willemsen, D. (2012). RehaWeb – An information
system for cardiologic rehabilitation assistance in the
third phase. Technical report, TU Dortmund Univer-
sity.
Eifert, G. H., Thompson, R. N., Zvolensky, M. J., Edwards,
K., Frazer, N. L., Haddad, J. W., and Davig, J. (2000).
The cardiac anxiety questionnaire: development and
preliminary validity. In Behaviour Research and Ther-
apy, volume 38, pages 1039–1053. Elsevier Ltd.
Fielding, R. T. (2000). Architectural styles and the design
of network-based software architectures. PhD thesis,
University of California. AAI9980887.
Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell – Telefonischer Gesund-
heitssurvey (GEDA) (2009/2010). Gesundheit in
Deutschland aktuell – Telefonischer Gesundheitssur-
vey (GEDA): Durchschnittliche sportliche Aktivit
¨
at
pro Woche (Anteil der Befragten in Prozent).
Kotseva, K., Wood, D., Backer, G. D., Bacquer, D. D., Py-
oeraelae, K., and Keil, U. (2009). Cardiovascular pre-
vention guidelines in daily practice: a comparison of
euroaspire i, ii, and iii surveys in eight european coun-
tries. The Lancet, 373(9667):929 – 940.
Lampert, C., Schwinge, C., and Tolks, D. (2009). Der
gespielte Ernst des Lebens: Bestandsaufnahme und
Potenziale von Serious Games (for Health). Zeitschrift
f
¨
ur Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 15/16:1–
16.
Lee, C., Folsom, A., and Blair, S. (2003). Physical activity
and stroke risk: a meta-analysis. Stroke, 34(10):2475–
81.
HEALTHINF2014-InternationalConferenceonHealthInformatics
88