Figure 10: CAD templates aligned and scaled on the
crowns model with the respective constraint lines for root
tips.
Figure 11: Final height scaling and orientation (green
model) of the tooth CAD template (blue model).
Figure 12: Merging between crown geometry (gray
model) and scaled tooth CAD template (green model).
4 CONCLUSIONS
In the field of orthodontic dentistry, one of the main
challenges relies on the accurate determination of
3D dentition geometries by exposing the patient to
the minimum radiation dose. In this context, the
present paper outlines a methodology to infer 3D
shape of tooth roots by combining the patient digital
plaster cast with a panoramic radiograph. The
method investigates the possibility to adapt general
dental CAD templates over the real anatomy by
exploiting geometrical information contained within
the panoramic image and the digital plaster cast. The
proposed modelling approach, which has showed
encouraging preliminary results, allows a
generalised formulation of the problem since
assumptions about the tomographic device used for
radiographic data capturing are not required.
Many are the variables involved in the adopted
formulation. In particular, key issues are represented
by the optimization of the
curve, whose slope
determines the orientation of root tip constraint
lines, and the accurate evaluation of magnification
factors along the z-direction of the PAN image.
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 13: (a) CBCT tooth ground truth, (b) overlapping
between CBCT and reconstructed tooth model, (c)
discrepancies between the two models.
These topics certainly require further research
activities taking also into account, for example,
additional information which could be extracted by
supplementary lateral radiographs.
REFERENCES
Barone, S., Paoli, A. & Razionale, A. 2013. Creation of
3D Multi-Body Orthodontic Models by Using
Independent Imaging Sensors. Sensors, 13, 2033-
2050.
Boyd, R. L. 2007. Complex orthodontic treatment using a
new protocol for the Invisalign appliance. Journal of
Clinical Orthodontics, 41, 525-547.
Kuncio, D., Maganzini, A., Shelton, C. & Freeman, K.
2007. Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment
postretention outcomes compared using the American
Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.
Angle Orthodontist, 77, 864-869.
Mazzotta, L., Cozzani, M., Razionale, A., Mutinelli, S.,
Castaldo, A. & Silvestrini-Biavati, A. 2013. From 2D
to 3D: Construction of a 3D Parametric Model for
Detection of Dental Roots Shape and Position from a
Panoramic Radiograph—A Preliminary
Report. International Journal of Dentistry, 2013, 8.
Pei, Y. R., Shi, F. H., Chen, H., Wei, J., Zha, H. B., Jiang,
R. P. & Xu, T. M. 2012. Personalized Tooth Shape
Estimation From Radiograph and Cast. IEEE
Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 59, 2400-
2411.
Tohnak, S., Mehnert, A., Crozier, S. & Mahoney, M.
2006. Synthesizing panoramic radiographs by
unwrapping dental CT data. 2006 28th Annual
International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in
Medicine and Biology Society, Vols 1-15, 1484-1487.
Customised3DToothModelingbyMinimallyInvasiveImagingModalities
75