![](bg6.png)
hoger onderwijs. [Report preliminary investigation of
higher education students’ difficulties of literacy
skills]. Antwerp: Linguapolis/University of Antwerp.
Available at: <http://webh01.ua.ac.be/linguapolis/
mom/Intern_rapport_verkennend_onderzoek_naar_kn
elpunten_taalvaardigheid_in_het_hoger_onderwijs-
Monitoraat_op_maat.pdf> (Accessed 27 June 2012).
Berckmoes, D., Rombouts, H., Hertogs, K., 2010.
Taalstimulering academisch Nederlands voor
studenten aan de Universiteit Antwerpen. Monitoraat
op maat. Rapport derde jaar, september 2008 –
augustus 2009 (Language stimulation academic Dutch
for students at the University of Antwerp. Report third
year). Linguapolis/University of Antwerp.
Bonset, H., 2010. Nederlands in voortgezet en hoger
onderwijs: hoe sluit dat aan? (Dutch in secondary and
higher education: how does it match?). Levende talen
magazine, 97(3), pp. 16-20.
Dale, R., Kilgarriff, A. 2011. Helping Our Own: The HOO
2011 Pilot Shared Task. Proceedings of the 13th
European Workshop on Natural Language
Generation, pp. 242–249.
De Smet, M. J. R., Broekkamp, H., Brand-Gruwel, S.,
Kirschner, P. A., 2011. Effects of electronic outlining
on students’ argumentative writing performance.
Journal of computer assisted learning, 27, pp. 557-
574.
De Vries, H., Van der Westen, W., 2008. Talige
competentie in het hoger onderwijs (Linguistic
competence in higher education). In: S. Vanhooren, A.
Mottard, eds. 2008. 22ste conferentie Het Schoolvak
Nederlands. Gent: Academia Press. pp. 115-120.
De Wachter, L., Heeren, J., 2011. Taalvaardig aan de start.
Een behoefteanalyse rond taalproblemen en
remediëring van eerstejaarsstudenten aan de
KULeuven (Entry-level academic language skills. A
needs analysis of language problems and remedy of
first year university students at the University of
Leuven). Leuven Language Institute/University of
Leuven. Retrieved from https://ilt.kuleuven.be/
cursus/docs/Behoefteanalyse_TaalVaST.pdf.
Dugan, R. F. Jr., Polanski, V. G., 2006. Writing for
computer science: a taxonomy of writing tasks and
general advice. Journal of Computing Sciences in
Colleges, 21(6), pp. 191-203.
Flesch. R., 1948. A new readability yardstick. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 32, pp. 221-233.
Fontana, N. M., Caldeira, S. M. A., De Oliveira, L. C. F.,
Oliveira Jr., O.N. 2006. Computer assisted writing.
Applications to English as a foreign language. CALL,
6(2), pp. 145-161.
Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., Davis, N. E. 2011. Online
formative assessment in higher education: a review of
the literature. Computers and Education, 57, pp. 2333-
2351.
Graham, S., Perin, D., 2007. Writing next: Effective
strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle
and high schools – A report to Carnegie Corporation
of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent
Education. Available at: http://www.all4ed.org/
files/WritingNext.pdf (Accessed 12 September 2012).
Gray, E. F., Emerson, L., MacKay, B., 2005. Meeting the
demands of the workplace: science students and
written skills. Journal of science education and
technology, 14(4), pp. 425-435.
Jansen, C., Lentz, L., 2008. Hoe begrijpelijk is mijn tekst?
De opkomst, neergang en terugkeer van
leesbaarheidsformules (How understandable is my
text? The rise, downfall and comeback of readability
formulas). Available at: http://www.kennislink.nl/
publicaties/hoe-begrijpelijk-is-mijn-tekst (Accessed 1
January 2014).
Kinnunen, T., Leisma, H., Machunik, M., Kakkonen, T.,
Lebrun, J. L., 2012. SWAN – Scientific Writing
AssistaNt. A tool for helping scholars to write reader-
friendly manuscripts. Proceedings of the 13th
conference of the European chapter of the association
for computational linguistics, pp. 20-24.
Leakey, J., 2011. Evaluating computer-assisted language
learning. An integrated approach to effectiveness
research in CALL. Bern: Peter Lang.
Naber, D. 2014. Language Tool Style and Grammar
Checker. Available at: www.languagetool.org
(Accessed 1 January 2014).
Nadashi, T., Sinclair, S., 2001-2014. Spell Check Plus.
Nadaclair Language Technologies. Available at: <
http://spellcheckplus.com> (Accessed 1 January
2014).
Napolitano, D. M., Stent, A., 2009. TechWriter: an
evolving system for writing assistance for advanced
learners of English. CALICO Journal, 26(3), pp. 611-
625.
Peters, E., Van Houtven, T., 2010. De weg naar
materiaalontwikkeling is geplaveid met behoeftes (The
way to material design is paved with needs). In: E.
Peters, T. Van Houtven, eds. 2010. Taalbeleid in het
hoger onderwijs. De hype voorbij?. Leuven: Acco. pp.
71-85.
Rymenams, S., Verlinde, S., Marx, S., Rosselle, M.,
Gerard, L., 2012. SOS-français: conception et
évaluation d’un didacticiel d’aide à la rédaction
interactif (SOS-French: development and evaluation of
a didactic aid in an interactive environment). 3e
Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française. SHS Web
of Conferences, 1, pp. 377-393.
Sytsma, S., 2002. The basics of experimental design.
Available at: http://courses.washington.edu/bio480/
Basics_of_Experimental_Design.pdf (Accesses 20
November 2012).
Taylor, H. G., Paine, K. M., 1993. An inter-disciplinary
approach to the development of writing skills in
computer science students. Proceedings of the
SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science
Education, pp. 274-278.
WritingAidDutch-SupportingStudents'WritingSkillsbyMeansofaStringandPatternMatchingbasedWebApplication
491