Reflections on the Concept of Interoperability in Information Systems

Delfina Soares, Luis Amaral

2014

Abstract

Information systems interoperability is one of the main concerns and challenges of information systems managers and researchers, most of whom perceive and approach it on a pure or predominantly technological perspective. In this paper, we argue that a sociotechnical perspective of information systems interoperability should be adopted and we set out seven assertions that, if taken into consideration, may improve the understanding, management, and study of the information systems interoperability phenomenon.

References

  1. Alter, S., 1992. Information Systems: A Management Perspective, Reading: Addison-Wesley.
  2. Amaral, L., 1994. PRAXIS: Um Referencial para o Planeamento de Sistemas de Informação. PhD Thesis, University of Minho, Braga.
  3. Aubert, B., Vandenbosch, B., and Mignerat, M., 2003. Towards the Measurement of Process Integration. Available: http://expertise.hec.ca/gresi/wp-content /uploads/3013/02/cahier0306.pdf (29 Sept 2013).
  4. Busson, A. and Keravel, A., 2005. Interoperable government providing services: key questions and solutions analysed through 40 case studies collected in Europe. In Proceedings of the eGov-Interop'05 Conference, 23-24 February, Geneva, Switzerland.
  5. Carney, D. and Oberndorf, P., 2004. Integration and Interoperability Models for Systems of Systems. Available: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/assets
  6. /sstcincose.pdf (4 Dec 2013).
  7. Chen, D., 2005. Practices, principles and patterns for interoperability. Report of INTEROP NoE, FP6 - Network of Excellence - Deliverable 6.1, May 2005.
  8. Chen, D. and Doumeingts, G., 2003. European initiatives to develop interoperability of enterprise applications - basic concepts, framework and roadmap. Annual Reviews in Control 27(2): 153-162.
  9. Chen, D., Doumeingts, G., and Vernadat, F., 2008. Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: Past, present and future. Computers in Industry 59 (7): 647-659.
  10. CompTIA, 2004. European Interoperability Framework - ICT Industry Recommendations. White Paper.
  11. Daclin, N., 2005. Contribution to a methodology to develop interoperability of enterprise applications. In Proceedings of the INTEROP-ESA'05, 23-25 February, Geneva, Switzerland.
  12. Dodd, J., Peat, B., Mayo, D., Christian, E., and Webber, D., 2003. Interoperability Strategy: Concepts, Challenges, and Recommendations. Industry Advisory Council.
  13. Doherty, N. and King, M., 1998. The importance of Organisational Issues in Systems Development. Information Technology & People 11(2): 104-123.
  14. EC, 2008. Draft document as basis for EIF 2.0. Draft for public comments. European Commission.
  15. Faughn, A., 2002. Interoperability: Is it Achievable? Program on Information Resources Policy. Available: http://pirp.harvard.edu/pubs_pdf/faughn/faughn-p02- 6.pdf (2 Dec 2013).
  16. IEEE, 1997. The IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms. 6th Edition. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
  17. integrate, 2014. In Merriam-Webster.com. Available: http://www.merriam-webster.com/diction ary/integrate (14 Jan 2014).
  18. Lee, J. and Myers, M., 2004. The Challenges of Enterprise Integration: Cycles of Integration and Desintegration Over Time. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2004), December 2004, Washington DC, USA.
  19. Lueders, H., 2005. Interoperability and Open Standards for eGovernment Services. In Proceedings of the eGov-Interop'05 Conference, 23-24 February, Geneva, Switzerland..
  20. Luna-Reyes, L., Zhang, J., Gil-Garcia, R., Cresswell, A., 2005. Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: a practice approach. European Journal of Information Systems 14(2): 93-105.
  21. Miller, P., 2000. Interoperability: What is it and Why should I want it?. Available: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk /issue24/interoperability (29 Sep 2013).
  22. Panetto, H. and Molina A., 2008. Enterprise integration and interoperability in manufacturing systems: Trends and issues. Computers in Industry 59 (7): 641-646.
  23. Parker, P., 2009. Interoperability: Webster's Timeline History, 1983-2007. California: ICON Group Int.
  24. Pavlou, P. and Singletary, L., 2002. Empirical Study of Stakeholders' Perceived Benefits of Integration Attributes for Enterprise IT Applications. In Proceedings of the 8th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2002).
  25. Reach, 2004. Reach Interoperability Guidelines: Interoperability Theory and Practice. Available: http://sdec.reach.ie/rigs/rig0012/pdf/rig0012_v0_41.pd f (9 May 2005).
  26. Sasovova, Z., Heng, M. and Newman, M., 2001. Limits to Using ERP Systems. In Proceedings of the 7th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2001), Paper 221: 1142-1146.
  27. Schwarzenbacher, K. and Wagner, J., 2005. The Federative Principle in Business Architecture. In Proceedings of the INTEROP-ESA'05, 23-25 February, Geneva, Switzerland.
  28. Tsagkani, C., 2005. Inter-Organisational Collaboration on the Process Layer. In Proceedings of the INTEROPESA'05, 23-25 February, Geneva, Switzerland.
  29. Visala, S., 1991. Broadening the Empirical Framework of Information Systems Research. In Nissen, H., Klein, H. and Hirschheim, R. (Eds.), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions: 347-364. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  30. 1. Interoperable - adjective (of computer systems or software) able to operate in conjunction. Compact Oxford English Dictionary of Current English, Third Edition, Oxford University Press, 2005.
  31. 2. Interoperability - characteristic that allows the connection and jointly of multiple computers. Grande Dicionário da Língua Portuguesa,Porto Editora, 2004.
  32. 3. Interoperability is the ability to use resources from diverse origins as if they had been designed as parts of a single system. Bollinger, T., 2000. A Guide to Understanding Emerging Interoperability Technologies. MITRE (http://www.mitre.org/work/tech_papers/tech_papers_00/bollinger_interoperability/bollinger_interop.pdf).
  33. 5. The ability of one system to receive and process intelligible information of mutual interest transmitted by another system. [JINTACCS 74] cited in Kasunic, M. and Anderson, W., 2004. Measuring Systems Interoperability: Challenges and Opportunities, Carnegie Mellon University.
  34. 6. Interoperability is the ability of information systems to operate in conjunction with each other encompassing communication protocols, hardware, software, application, and data compatibility layers. ICH Glossary of Terms (http://www.ichnet.org/glossary.htm). Poler, R., Tomás, J. and Velardi, P., 2005. Interoperability Glossary, INTEROP NoE, Deliverable 10.1, Version 1B.
  35. 7. Enabling different systems to work together and exchange data. CETIS Acronyms and Glossary (http://www.cetis.ac.uk/members/enterprise/glossary)
  36. 9. Interoperability is the ability to exchange information and mutually to use the information which has been exchanged. Council Directive of 14 May 199 on the legal protection of computer programmes (91/250/EEC).
  37. 15. Interoperability is the ability of different types of databases, applications, operating systems, and platforms to function in an integrated manner. http://www.dddmag.com/scripts/glossary.asp
  38. 16. Interoperability is the ability of one manufacturer's computer equipment to operate alongside, communicate with, and exchange information with another vendor's dissimilar computer equipment. http://www.networkbuyersguide.com/search/105487.htm
  39. 17. Interoperability is the ability to exchange and use information (usually in a large heterogeneous network made up of several local area networks). http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/interoperability http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn
  40. 18. Interoperability is the ability of different types of computers, networks, operating systems, and applications to work together effectively, without prior communication, in order to exchange information in a useful and meaningful manner. Dublin Core Metadata Glossary (http://library.csun.edu/mwoodley/dublincoreglossary.html).
  41. 19. Interoperability is the ability of content, a subsystem or system to seamlessly work with other systems, subsystems or content via the use of agreed specifications/standards. http://www.tasi.ac.uk/glossary/glossary_technical.html
  42. 20. Interoperability is the ability of heterogeneous systems and networks to communicate and cooperate through specified standards. http://info.louisiana.edu/dept/glosi.html
  43. 21. Interoperability is the ability of equipment from multiple vendors to communicate using standardized protocols. http://www.nationaldatamux.com/G50001.htm
  44. 22. Interoperability may be defined as a process that effectively links two or more systems (marketplaces or other service providers) or organizations in a partial or fully transparent manner (for users). Scriven, G., "Interoperability in Australian Government E-Procurement - Strategy versus Reality", 7th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Adelaide, South Africa, 2003.
  45. 23. Interoperability is achieved only if the interaction between two systems can, at least, take place at the three levels: data, resource and business process with the semantics defined in a business context. Chen, D. and G. Doumeingts (2003). "European initiatives to develop interoperability of enterprise applications:- basic concepts, framework and roadmap." Annual Reviews in Control, 27(2): 153-162.
  46. 24. Interoperability is the capability to communicate, execute programs, or transfer data among various functional units in a manner that requires the user to have little or no knowledge of the unique characteristics of those units. ISO 19119 Services.
  47. 25. Interoperability is the ability to share and exchange information using common syntax and semantics to meet an application-specific functional relationship through the use of a common interface. ISO16100.
  48. 27. Interoperability is the ability of ICT systems and of the business processes they support to exchange data and to enable sharing of information and knowledge. IDABC, European Interoperability Framework for pan-European eGovernment Services, 2004.
  49. 29.Interoperability is defined as the ability to communicate, execute programs, or transfer data among various functional units due to the use of common languages and protocols, requiring little or no knowledge of the user about the specific features of these units. APDSI, 2011, Glossário da Sociedade da Informação (http://www.apdsi.pt/uploads/news/id432/gloss%C3% Alrio%da%20si%20-%20vers%C3%A3o%202011.pdf)
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Soares D. and Amaral L. (2014). Reflections on the Concept of Interoperability in Information Systems . In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-027-7, pages 331-339. DOI: 10.5220/0004969703310339


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis14,
author={Delfina Soares and Luis Amaral},
title={Reflections on the Concept of Interoperability in Information Systems},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,},
year={2014},
pages={331-339},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004969703310339},
isbn={978-989-758-027-7},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,
TI - Reflections on the Concept of Interoperability in Information Systems
SN - 978-989-758-027-7
AU - Soares D.
AU - Amaral L.
PY - 2014
SP - 331
EP - 339
DO - 10.5220/0004969703310339