![](bg8.png)
Linear project planning leads to bad communication
between different sub-group designers, which result
in poor integration design. From the management
point of view, we can further this classification by
adding an organizational dimension to project
planning. These two classification is shown in figure
11.
By comparing these two project organizations,
we can see that in the project team 2012,
competence was distributed homogenously for each
group, members were divided into computer science
group and mechanical design group; whereas
competence was paired in the project team 2013,
computer science and mechanical design both exist
in each sub-group. From this classification view, we
may draw the conclusion that if designers with
different skills are assigned to the same task, project
tends to be carried out more concurrently, which
leads to a more satisfactory result.
Extraction of these rules are all guided by
comparison of structured information according to
different project views, rules may change as more
project information will be captured. CDK
classification will progress in a cumulative manner.
5 CONCLUSION AND
PERSPECTIVE
This paper presented our research work on
cooperative knowledge, especially on how to
discovery cooperative knowledge in order to reuse
them. A CKD method was proposed for this purpose
in design project field. It is a knowledge
classification guided by semantic network schemas.
Instead of classifying domain expert knowledge,
interaction schemas between concepts were
classified; it allows us to put each important concept
in its interactive context. A CKD classification is
semantically expressive and comprehensible by
users. Therefore, it is up to users to choose which
classification view to use for knowledge extraction.
We tested CKD method on two example projects,
which shows that cooperative knowledge can be
extracted by interaction schema classification, more
importantly, the knowledge rules extracted can be
quite useful for learning purpose.
No classification can be argued to be a
representation of the true structure of knowledge, the
design project knowledge classification showed in
this paper is a application field of CKD method,
class conceptualization, semantic network structure
and knowledge classification views are strictly
linked to design project context. In other words, a
CKD classification model should be built according
to application domain features. In order to enrich
this application, we will try to formalize
classification rules with programming languages and
test our model on more complicated projects.
REFERENCES
Bekhti, S., Matta, N., 2003. "Project memory: An
approach of modelling and reusing the context and the
design rationale", Proc. of IJCAI, Vol. 3.
Buckingham Shum S., 1997. Representing Hard-to-
Formalise, Contextualised, Multidisciplinary,
Organisational Knowledge, in AAI Spring Symposium
on Artificial Intelligence in Knowledge Management,
pp. 9–16.
Castillo-Navetty, O., Matta, N., 2005. "Definition of a
practical learning system," Information Technology
Based Higher Education and Training, 2005. ITHET
2005. 6th International Conference on vol., no.,
pp.T4A/1,T4A/6, 7-9.
Cohen, H., Lefebvre, C., eds, 2005. “Handbook of
categorization in cognitive science”, Vol.4, No.9.1,
Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Conklin, J., Begeman, M. L., 1988. “gIBIS: a hypertext
tool for exploratory policy discussion,” ACM
Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 6., pp. 303–
331.
Dietterich, T.G., 1997. "Machine-learning research", AI
magazine, Vol.18, No.4, pp 97.
Djaiz, C., Matta, N., 2006. "Project situations aggregation
to identify cooperative problem solving strategies." In
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and
Engineering Systems, pp. 687-697. Springer Berlin
Heidelberg.
Domingos P., 2012. “A few useful things to know about
machine learning,” Commun. ACM, vol. 55, no. 10, p.
78.
Ducellier, G., Matta, N., Charlot, Y., and Tribouillois, F.,
2013. "Traceability and structuring of cooperative
Knowledge in design using PLM."International
Journal of Knowledge Management Research and
Practices 11, no. 4 pp: 20.
Ducellier, G., 2008. Thèse aux plateformes PLM, Univ.
Troyes, France, 2008.
Easterby-Smith, M. P. V, Lyles, M., 2003. “The Blackwell
Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge
Management.,” Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 48, p. 676.
Fensel, D., 2000. "Ontologies: A silver bullet for
Knowledge Management and Electronic-Commerce."
Berlin: Spring-Verlag.
Goodman, R.M., Smyth, P., 1992. "An information
theoretic approach to rule induction from databases,"
Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE transactions,
Vol.4, No. 4 , pp 301-316.
Gruber, T.R., 1995. "Toward principles for the design of
ontologies used for knowledge sharing?", International
KMIS2014-InternationalConferenceonKnowledgeManagementandInformationSharing
34