The old persian cuneiform character recognition
system was tested for three set of noisy images and
As it is shown in Table recognition rate for 46
images of training set was 100% correct
identification as it would be expected.
For the test set we applied three different levels
of Guassian filter
By applying Guassian filter with
3
To 46 images 100% (46 out of 46) of Noisy
images were identified correctly.
By applying Guassian filter with
5.3
To 46 images 93.4% (43 out of 46) of
Noisy images were identified correctly.
By applying Guassian filter with
4
To 46 images 89.1% (41 out of 46) of
Noisy images were identified correctly.
Table 1: Neural network parameters.
Parameter Value
Input Neurons 4096
Hidden Neurons 44
Output Neurons 46
Learning Coefficient 0.002
Momentum Rate 0.45
Minimum Error 0.005
Maximum Iterations 5000
Iterations for training 243
Training Time(seconds) 13
Run Time(seconds) 0.07
Table 2: Neural network system's recognition rate.
Noise Level
3
5.3
4
TrainSet 100% 100% 100%
TestSet 100% 93.4% 89.1%
8 CONCLUSION
This paper presented Old Persian Cuneiform
character recognition system based on artificial
neural network.
The training database of this system consisted of
46 noise-free images of 46 alphanumeric old Persian
characters.
Applying three different levels of Guassian filter
with
3
, 5.3
and 4
to the original
images lead to creating a test dataset with totally 184
images.(46 noise-free images and 46 images for
each particular level of Gaussian filter.)
Training the neural network uses only 46 noise-
free images and testing the trained neural network
was performed using four different set of images
with different levels of noise.
The highest obtained rate for correct
identification of testing set Old Persian character
images was 100%. These images were not feed to
the neural network during training.
REFERENCES
Daniels, P., Bright, W., 1996. The World's Writing
Systems, Oxford University Press.
Edan , N., 2013. Cuneiform symbols recognition based on
k-means and neural network, fifth scientific conference
information technology, December 19-20.
Gaussian filtering lecture handouts of the University of
Auckland Department of Computer Science, 2014,
Accessed 21 April 2014, Available from:
<https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/courses/compsci373s
1c/PatricesLectures/Image%20Filtering.pdf>
Kashyap, k., Bansilal, Koushik, P., 2003. Hybrid neural
network architecture for age identification of ancient
kannada scripts,circuits and systems,2003.ISCAS
’03.Proceeding of the 2003 international symposium
on.(volum:5), 25-28 May.
Kent, R., 1950. Old Persian Grammar Texts Lexicon,
American Oriental Society, New Haven.
Nixon, M., Aguado, A., 2002. Feature Extraction and
Image Processing. Newnes, 1st edition.
Patra, P., Vipsita, S., Mohapatra, S., Dash, S., 2010. A
novel approach for pattern recognition, International
Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887)
Volume 9– No.8, November 2010.
The Achaemenid Persian Empire,2000 , Accessed 21
April 2014, available from <http://www.metmuseum.
org/toah/hd/acha/hd_acha.htm >
The Unicode consortium, v6.3, Accessed 21 April 2014,
Available from <http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/
U103A0.pdf>
Windfuhr, G., 1970. Notes on the old Persian signs, Indo-
Iranian Journal XII/2, pp. 121-125.
Yang, F., Yang, F., 2008. Character recognition using
parallel BP network, Audio language and image
processing 2008.ICALIP., shanghai, July 7-9 .
Yousif, H., Rahma, A., Alani, H., 2006. Cuneifrom
symbols recognition using intensity curves, The
international Arab journal of information technology
vol.3,No.3 ,July 2006.
IntelligentRecognitionofAncientPersianCuneiformCharacters
123