Fuzzy Inference System to Analyze Ordinal Variables - The Case of Evaluating Teaching Activity

Michele Lalla, Davide Ferrari, Tommaso Pirotti

2014

Abstract

The handling of ordinal variables presents many difficulties in both the measurements phase and the statistical data analysis. Many efforts have been made to overcome them. An alternative approach to traditional methods used to process ordinal data has been developed over the last two decades. It is based on a fuzzy inference system and is presented, here, applied to the student evaluations of teaching data collected via Internet in Modena, during the academic year 2009/10, by a questionnaire containing items with a four-point Likert scale. The scores emerging from the proposed fuzzy inference system proved to be approximately comparable to scores obtained through the practical, but questionable, procedure based on the average of the item value labels. The fuzzification using a number of membership functions smaller than the number of modalities of input variables yielded outputs that were closer to the average of the item value labels. The Center-of-Area defuzzification method showed good performances and lower dispersion around the mean of the value labels.

References

  1. Babbie, E. R. (2010). Introduction to social research. Cengage learning, Wadsworth (Belmont, CA), 12th edition.
  2. Bernberg, R. E. (1952). Socio-psychological factors in industrial morale: I. the prediction of specific indicators. The Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1):73-82.
  3. Cantril, H. and Free, L. A. (1962). Hopes and fears for self and country. American Behavioral Scientist, 6(2):4- 30.
  4. CNVSU (2002). Proposta di un insieme minimo di domande per la valutazione della didattica da parte degli studenti frequentanti. Doc 09/02, Retrieved from http://www.cnvsu.it:Accessed 28 July 2011.
  5. Crespi, I. (1961). Use of a scaling technique in surveys. The Journal of Marketing, 25(July):69-72.
  6. Crespi, L. P. (1945a). Public opinion toward conscientious objectors: Ii. measurement of national approvaldisapproval. The Journal of Psychology, 19(2):209- 250.
  7. Crespi, L. P. (1945b). Public opinion toward conscientious objectors: Iii. intensity of social rejection in stereotype and attitude. The Journal of Psychology, 19(2):251-276.
  8. Dubois, D. and Prade, H. E. (2000). Fundamentals of fuzzy sets. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
  9. Grzegorzewski, P. (2008). Trapezoidal approximations of fuzzy numbers preserving the expected interval - algorithms and properties. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159(11):1354-1364.
  10. Grzegorzewski, P. and Mrówka, E. (2005). Trapezoidal approximations of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 153(1):115-135.
  11. Grzegorzewski, P. and Mrówka, E. (2007). Trapezoidal approximations of fuzzy numbers - revisited. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 158(7):757-768.
  12. Juster, F. T. (1960). Prediction and consumer buying intentions. The American Economic Review, 50(2):604- 617.
  13. Juster, F. T. (1966). Consumer buying intentions and purchase probability: An experiment in survey design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61(315):658-696.
  14. Kilpatrick, F. P. and Cantril, H. (1960). Self-anchoring scaling: A measure of individuals' unique reality worlds. Journal of Individual Psychology, 16(2 Nov):158- 173.
  15. Lalla, M. and Facchinetti, G. (2004). Measurement and fuzzy scales. Atti della XLII Riunione Scientifica, pages 351-362.
  16. Lalla, M., Facchinetti, G., and Mastroleo, G. (2004). Ordinal scales and fuzzy set systems to measure agreement: An application to the evaluation of teaching activity. Quality and Quantity, 38(5):577-601.
  17. Lalla, M. and Ferrari, D. (2011). Web-based versus paperbased data collection for the evaluation of teaching activity: empirical evidence from a case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(3):347- 365.
  18. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology, monograph no. 140:1- 55.
  19. Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International journal of educational research, 11(3):253-388.
  20. N.N. (2007). fuzzyTECH 5.7 Users Manual. INFORM GmbH, Aachen, D.
  21. Osgood, C. E. (1952). The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological bulletin, 49(3):197-237.
  22. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. University if Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
  23. Schuman, H. and Presser, S. (1996). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  24. Smithson, M. (1988). Fuzzy set theory and the social sciences: the scope for applications. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 26(1):1-21.
  25. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103:677-680.
  26. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological review, 34(4):273-286.
  27. Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American journal of Sociology, 33(4):529-554.
  28. Van Leekwijck, W. and Kerre, E. E. (1999). Defuzzification: criteria and classification. Fuzzy sets and systems, 108(2):159-178.
  29. Von Altrock, C. (1997). Fuzzy logic and neuroFuzzy applications in business and finance. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  30. Weisberg, H. F. and Rusk, J. G. (1970). Dimensions of candidate evaluation. The American Political Science Review, 64(4):1167-1185.
  31. White, M. (1926). Psychological technique and social problems. Southwestern Political and Social Science Quarterly, 7:58-73.
  32. Yeh, C.-T. (2009). Weighted trapezoidal and triangular approximations of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 160(21):3059-3079.
  33. Yu, J. H., Albaum, G., and Swenson, M. (2003). Is a central tendency error inherent in the use of semantic differential scales in different cultures? International Journal of Market Research, 45(2):213-228.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Lalla M., Ferrari D. and Pirotti T. (2014). Fuzzy Inference System to Analyze Ordinal Variables - The Case of Evaluating Teaching Activity . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fuzzy Computation Theory and Applications - Volume 1: FCTA, (IJCCI 2014) ISBN 978-989-758-053-6, pages 25-36. DOI: 10.5220/0005054400250036


in Bibtex Style

@conference{fcta14,
author={Michele Lalla and Davide Ferrari and Tommaso Pirotti},
title={Fuzzy Inference System to Analyze Ordinal Variables - The Case of Evaluating Teaching Activity},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Fuzzy Computation Theory and Applications - Volume 1: FCTA, (IJCCI 2014)},
year={2014},
pages={25-36},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005054400250036},
isbn={978-989-758-053-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Fuzzy Computation Theory and Applications - Volume 1: FCTA, (IJCCI 2014)
TI - Fuzzy Inference System to Analyze Ordinal Variables - The Case of Evaluating Teaching Activity
SN - 978-989-758-053-6
AU - Lalla M.
AU - Ferrari D.
AU - Pirotti T.
PY - 2014
SP - 25
EP - 36
DO - 10.5220/0005054400250036