5 10 15 20 25
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
(a)
(b)
Figure 13: Experimental results: (a)ISMA (A) Vs Time (s)
at 1Hz, (b)Vinput (V) Vs Time (s) at 1.5 Hz.
used like a steeper motor (because we can control the
contraction length and have resolution of steps from
less than a millimeterr) or continuous motor in ap-
plications where the weight a size are critical, and in
particular to make less complex robots reducing the
control and hardware cost.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
William Coral acknowledge to the Administrative
Department of Science, Technology and Innova-
tion (COLCIENCIAS) (grant call 568 2013) and
COLFU TU RO (grant call 2012) from Colombia for
its support. The authors acknowledge the support
of the Robotics and Cybernetics Group at the Cen-
tre for Automation and Robotics UPM-CSIC, the
project ROBOCITY 2030 (Community of Madrid S-
0505/DPI/000235) and the project ROTOS (Ministry
of Science And Innovation of Spain DPI2010-17998).
REFERENCES
ATI Industrial Automation. F/T Sensor: Nano17.
http://www.ati-ia.com. Accessed June 6, 2013.
Colorado, J., Barrientos, A., and Rossi, C. (2012). Biome-
chanics of smart wings in a bat robot: morphing wings
using SMA actuators. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics.
Coral, W., Rossi, C., and Monta
˜
no, J. C. (2012). SMA-
Based Muscle-Like Actuation in Biologically Inspired
Robots: A State of the Art Review. page 30. INTECH.
De Schutter, J. and van Brussel, H. (1988). Compliant robot
motion ii. a control approach based on external control
loops. International Journal of Robotics Research.,
7(4):18–33.
Ferguene, Farid, T. and Redouane (2009). Dynamic exter-
nal force feedback loop control of a robot manipulator
using a neural compensator, application to the trajec-
tory following in an unknown environment. Interna-
tional Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer
Science, 19(1):113–126.
Kuo, B. C. (1979). Step motors and control systems. Incre-
mental motion control. SRL Pub. Co.
Kuo, B. C. and Tal, J. (1979). Incremental Motion Con-
trol: Step motors and control systems, edited by B.
C. Kuo. Incremental Motion Control. SRL Publishing
Company.
Kuribayashi, K. (1989). A new servo motor using shape
memory alloy. In Industrial Electronics Society, 1989.
IECON ’89., 15th Annual Conference of IEEE, pages
139–144 and 238–243.
Measurement Computing. USB-1208FS.
http://www.mccdaq.com/usb-data-acquisition/USB-
1208FS.aspx. Accessed June 6, 2013.
Nation Instruments. NI PCI-6220.
http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/es/nid/14130.
Accessed June 6, 2013.
Otsuka, K. and Wayman, C. M. (1998). Mechanism of
shape memory effect and superelasticity. Shape mem-
ory materials.
Reynaerts, D. and Brussel, H. V. (1998). Design aspects
of shape memory actuators. Mechatronics, 8(6):635–
656.
Rossi, C., Colorado, J., Coral, W., and Barrientos, A.
(2011a). Bending continuous structures with SMAs: a
novel robotic fish design. Bioinspiration & Biomimet-
ics, 6(4):045005.
Rossi, C., Coral, W., and Barrientos., A. (2010). SMA Con-
trol for Bio-mimetic Fish Locomotion. In Interna-
tional Conference on Informatics in Control, Automa-
tion and Robotics (ICINCO), Madeira.
Rossi, C., Coral, W., and Barrientos, A. (2013). Robotic
Fish to Lead the School. In Palstra, A. P. and Planas,
J. V., editors, Swimming Physiology of Fish, pages
407–421. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Rossi, C., Coral, W., Colorado, J., and Barrientos, A.
(2011b). A motor-less and gear-less bio-mimetic
robotic fish design. In Robotics and Automation
(ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on,
pages 3646–3651.
Teh, Y. H. and Featherstone, R. (2008). An architecture
for fast and accurate control of shape memory alloy
actuators. International Journal of Robotics Research,
27(5):595–611.
ICINCO2014-11thInternationalConferenceonInformaticsinControl,AutomationandRobotics
568