The Effect of Implementation of a Program to Promote Physical
Activity in the Relationship between Functionality and
Well-being in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
Luísa Pedro
1
, José Pais-Ribeiro
2
and João Páscoa Pinheiro
3
1
ESTESL, IPL, Lisboa, Portugal
2
FPCE-UP/UIPES, Porto, Portugal
3
FMUC/CHUC, Coimbra, Portugal
Keywords: Physical Activity, Wellbeing, Multiple Sclerosis, Functionality.
Abstract: The aim of this study is to examine the implications of the IPPA in the perception of functionality and
wellbeing in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients. Methods - This is a quasi experimental study non-
randomized study with 27 MS patients diagnosed at least 1 year before, and with an EDSS score of under 7.
We used the IPPA in 3 groups of eight people in 3 Portuguese hospitals (Lisbon, Coimbra, and Porto). The
sessions were held once a week for 90 minutes, over a period of 7 weeks. The instruments used were: We
asked the subjects the question “Please classify your functionality?” and used the Personal Wellbeing Scale
(PWS) at the beginning (time A) and end (time B) of the IPPA. We used the SPSS version 20. We used the
spearman correlation test for the variable analysis. The intervention followed the recommendations of the
Helsinki Declaration. Results – The Results the correlations between the functionality perception and well-
being, before application of IPPA (r=0.47, p<0.01), and the end of the implementation of IPPA (r=0.63,
p<0.01). The results show that the IPPA improves the correlation between functionality and well-
being.Conclusions - The IPPA can play an important role in modifying the perception of functionality and
personal wellbeing.
1 INTRODUCTION
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease of the
central nervous system that affects more often young
adults in the prime of his career and personal
development, with no cure and unknown causes. The
most common signs and symptoms are fatigue,
muscle weakness, changes in sensation, ataxia,
changes in balance, gait difficulties, memory
difficulties, cognitive impairment and difficulties in
problem solving (Compston, Coles, 2008; Grima,
Torrance, Francis, Rice, Rosner, Lafortune, 2006).
MS is a relatively common neurological disorder in
which various impairments and disabilities impact
strongly on function and daily life activities.
The increasing the number of people with
chronic illness to live in the community, allows the
involvement of public health, management of
chronic disease, promoting well-being and
functionality of these people. The Promoting
physical activity in people with chronic disease,
such as multiple sclerosis (MS) has an important
role for public health (Asano, Dawes, Arafah,
Moriello, Mayo, 2009).
The aim of this study is implementation of a
program of physical activity to improve the
functionality and well being with patients of
Multiple Sclerosis (MS).
2 METHODS
This is a quasi experimental study, the hypothesis is:
people with MS that practice physical activity have a
better perception of the functionality; people with
MS that practice physical activity increase the well
being.
The study
includes a consecutive sample of 27
MS patients, diagnosed at least one year, and with an
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (Kurtzke,
1983) score under seven. The sample was divided in
three groups, each group including eight people,
collected sequentially in three Portuguese hospitals
(Lisbon, Coimbra, and Porto) with the collaboration
Pedro L., Pais-Ribeiro J. and Pinheiro J..
The Effect of Implementation of a Program to Promote Physical Activity in the Relationship between Functionality and Well-being in Patients with
Multiple Sclerosis.
Copyright
c
2014 SCITEPRESS (Science and Technology Publications, Lda.)
of their personal physician. The sessions were held
once a week for 90 minutes, over a period of seven
weeks.
The IPPA objective is to promote autonomous
physical activity visa a better well being. Each
session aimed: to stimulate group discussion about a
theme related to inability or limitation in physical
activity; to discuss strategies to minimize these
limitations; to define and learn appropriate physical
activities to implement between sessions.
We focus a set of exercises to be used in daily
life activities, according to studies developed with
MS patients (Howe, Gomperts, 2006; Khan, Turner-
Stokes, Kilpatrick , 2007; Rietberg, Brooks,
Uitdehaag, Kwakkel, 2005; Stuifbergen, Blozis,
Harrison, Becker, 2006; White, Dressendorfer ,
2004 ).
The application of the program followed the self
regulation model (Maes & Karol, 2005). This model
includes three procedural phases: the first phase, the
individuals identify and define personal goals they
wish to achieve; the second phase they implement
strategies to achieve pre-set goals; the third phase
they assess if they reach the intended objectives, as
well as maintenance.
The assessment of variables used one question
for disease severity, “Please classify your
functionality?” with an answer in numerical scale
between “0” and “11” and the Personal Wellbeing
Scale (PWS) (Pais Ribeiro & Cummins, 2008), a
one dimensional scale including seven questions
with a classification between “0” and “100”, to
assess well being, at the beginning (time A) and end
(time B) of the IPPA.
We used the Spearman correlation between the
functionality and Wellbeing scale. We used the
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)
version 20. The intervention followed the
recommendations of the Helsinki Declaration.
3 RESULTS
The age range of the subjects was between 20 and
58 years with a mean age of 44 years. 58.3 % were
women, 37.5 % were currently married, 67% were
retired and the mean level of education was 12.5
years.
The Results the correlations between the
functionality perception and well-being, before
application of IPPA (r=0.47, p<0.01), and the end
of the implementation of IPPA (r=0.63, p<0.01).
The results show that the IPPA improves the
correlation between functionality and well-being.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The IPPA can play an important role in modifying
the perception of functionality and personal
wellbeing. Initial hypothesis where confirmed. We
think this program promotion and awareness of the
importance of physical activity, using the conceptual
model of self-regulation, can be very beneficial for
the prevention of disabilities you stay in people with
MS.
REFERENCES
Asano, M., Dawes, D., Arafah, A., Moriello C & Mayo
NE. (2009). What does a structured review of the
effectiveness of exercise interventions for persons with
multiple sclerosis tell us about the challenges of
designing trials? Multiple Sclerosis, 15, 412–421.
Compston, A., Coles, A., 2008. Multiple Sclerosis. Lancet
372, 1502–1517.
Grima, DT., Torrance, GW., Francis, G., Rice, G., Rosner,
AJ., Lafortune, L., 2006. Cost and health related
quality of life consequences of multiple sclerosis.
Multiple Sclerosis, 6, 91–98.
Howe, J., Gomperts M., 2006. Aerobic testing and
training for persons with multiple sclerosis: a review
with clinical recommendations. Physiotherapy
Canadian, 58, 259–270.
Khan F., Turner-Stokes L., Ng L., Kilpatrick T., 2007.
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with
multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database System Review
2007, 2:CD006036.
Kurtzke, J.F., 1983. Rating neurologic impairment in
multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale
(EDSS). Neurology, 33 (11), 1444–1452.
Maes S, Karoly P., 2005. Self-regulation assessment and
intervention in physical health and illness: a review.
Applied Psychology, 54, 267–99.
Pais Ribeiro, J., Cummins, R., 2008. O bem-estar pessoal:
estudo de validação da versão portuguesa da escala.
In: I.Leal, J.Pais-Ribeiro, I. Silva & S.Marques (Edts.).
Actas do 7º congresso nacional de psicologia da saúde
(pp. 505-508). Lisboa: ISPA
Rietberg, M.B., Brooks, D., Uitdehaag, B.M., & Kwakkel,
G., 2005. Exercise therapy for multiple sclerosis.
Cochrane Database System Review 1: 1–26
CD003980.
Stuifbergen, AK, Blozis, SA, Harrison, TC & Becker,
HA., 2006. Exercise, functional limitations, and
quality of life: a longitudinal study of persons with
multiple sclerosis. Archives Physical Medicine
Rehabilitation, 87, 935–943.
White LJ, Dressendorfer RH., 2004. Exercise and multiple
sclerosis. Sports Medicine, 34, 1077–1100