Rule Generation for Scenario based Decision Support System on Public Finance Domain

Mesut Çeviker, Özgür Bağlıoğlu

2014

Abstract

This study is a part of a larger project called “Ontology Based Decision Support System”. In this document, we report methodology of the Rule Generation (RG) that is planned to be taken from the knowledge queried from ontology based Knowledge Extraction System (KES). Rule generation aims producing rules for a rule based system, which will be used for future prediction of an organization or an organizational unit. The term “scenario based” implies that the system will do future prediction for possible scenarios of next movements like different budget scheduling scenarios. Future prediction will be limited to the prediction of parameters that the organization is willing to know, such as the parameters related to the objectives and the goals on their strategic plan. In literature, rule generation problems are addressed by variety of different learners; so what we plan is using a learners system with many learners possibly with different types. The system will be valuable for merging an ontology based KES and DSS with future prediction capability. In addition, this will be the first composite system (having mentioned KES+DES) for public finance domain.

References

  1. Alon, Uri, Barkai, Naama, Notterman, Daniel A, Gish, Kurt, Ybarra, Suzanne, Mack, Daniel, and Levine, Arnold J. 1999. Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(12), 6745-6750.
  2. Andrews, Robert, Diederich, Joachim, and Tickle, Alan B. 1995. Survey and critique of techniques for extracting rules from trained artificial neural networks. Knowledge-based systems, 8(6), 373-389.
  3. Augasta, M Gethsiyal, and Kathirvalavakumar, T. 2012. Rule extraction from neural networks-A comparative study. Pages 404-408 of: Pattern Recognition, Informatics and Medical Engineering (PRIME), 2012 International Conference on. IEEE.
  4. Bache, K., and Lichman, M. 2013. UCI Machine Learning Repository.
  5. Barakat, Nahla, and Bradley, Andrew P. 2010. Rule extraction from support vector machines: a review. Neurocomputing, 74(1), 178-190.
  6. Barakat, Nahla, and Diederich, Joachim. 2006. Eclectic Rule-Extraction from Support Vector Machines. International Journal of Computational Intelligence, 2(1).
  7. Box, George EP, and Jenkins, Gwilym M. 1976. Time series analysis, control, and forecasting.
  8. Browne, Antony. 1997. Neural network analysis, architectures and applications. CRC Press.
  9. Buchanan, B.G., and Duda, R.O. 1983. Principles of rulebased expert systems. Advances in Computers, 22, 163-216.
  10. Chen, Zhenyu, Li, Jianping, and Wei, Liwei. 2007. A multiple kernel support vector machine scheme for feature selection and rule extraction from gene expression data of cancer tissue. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 41(2), 161-175.
  11. De Falco, Ivanoe. 2013. Differential Evolution for automatic rule extraction from medical databases. Applied Soft Computing, 13(2), 1265-1283.
  12. Dhar, Vasant, and Stein, Roger. 1996. Intelligent decision support methods: the science of knowledge work.
  13. Etchells, Terence A, and Lisboa, Paulo JG. 2006. Orthogonal search-based rule extraction (OSRE) for trained neural networks: a practical and efficient approach. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, 17(2), 374-384.
  14. Finlay, Paul N. 1989. Introducing decision support systems. NCC Blackwell.
  15. Gestel, Tony Van, Baesens, Bart, Suykens, Johan AK, Van den Poel, Dirk, Baestaens, Dirk-Emma, and Willekens, Marleen. 2006. Bayesian kernel based classification for financial distress detection. European journal of operational research, 172(3), 979-1003.
  16. Golub, Todd R, Slonim, Donna K, Tamayo, Pablo, Huard, Christine, Gaasenbeek, Michelle, Mesirov, Jill P, Coller, Hilary, Loh, Mignon L, Downing, James R, Caligiuri, Mark A, et al. 1999. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. science, 286(5439), 531-537.
  17. Han, Jiawei, Kamber, Micheline, and Pei, Jian. 2006. Data mining: concepts and techniques. Morgan kaufmann.
  18. Hayes-Roth, F. 1985. Rule-based systems. Communications of the ACM, 28(9), 921-932.
  19. Hettich, S., and Bay, S. D. 1999. The UCI KDD Archive (http://kdd.ics.uci.edu).
  20. Jacobsson, Henrik. 2005. Rule Extraction from Recurrent Neural Networks: ATaxonomy and Review. Neural Computation, 17(6), 1223-1263.
  21. Kahramanli, Humar, and Allahverdi, Novruz. 2009. Rule extraction from trained adaptive neural networks using artificial immune systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1513-1522.
  22. Karl, G. 2014. Promoter prediction using IREM (inductive rule extraction method).
  23. Khan, Javed, Wei, Jun S, Ringner, Markus, Saal, Lao H, Ladanyi, Marc, Westermann, Frank, Berthold, Frank, Schwab, Manfred, Antonescu, Cristina R, Peterson, Carsten, et al. 2001. Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks. Nature medicine, 7(6), 673-679.
  24. Kuttiyil, A.S. 2004. Survey of rule extraction methods.
  25. Leng, Gang, McGinnity, Thomas Martin, and Prasad, Girijesh. 2005. An approach for on-line extraction of fuzzy rules using a self-organising fuzzy neural network. Fuzzy sets and systems, 150(2), 211-243.
  26. Li, Ai, and Chen, Guo. 2014. A new approach for rule extraction of expert system based on SVM. Measurement, 47, 715-723.
  27. Malone, James, McGarry, Kenneth, Wermter, Stefan, and Bowerman, Chris. 2006. Data mining using rule extraction from Kohonen self-organising maps. Neural Computing and Applications, 15(1), 9-17.
  28. Margara, Alessandro, Cugola, Gianpaolo, and Tamburrelli, Giordano. 2014. Learning From the Past: Automated Rule Generation for Complex Event Processing.
  29. Martens, David, Baesens, Bart, Van Gestel, Tony, and Vanthienen, Jan. 2007. Comprehensible credit scoring models using rule extraction from support vector machines. European journal of operational research, 183(3), 1466-1476.
  30. Martens, David, Baesens, BB, and Van Gestel, Tony. 2009. Decompositional rule extraction from support vector machines by active learning. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 21(2), 178- 191.
  31. Min, Jae H, and Lee, Young-Chan. 2005. Bankruptcy prediction using support vector machine with optimal choice of kernel function parameters. Expert systems with applications, 28(4), 603-614.
  32. Mitra, Sushmita, and Hayashi, Yoichi. 2000. Neuro-fuzzy rule generation: survey in soft computing framework. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, 11(3), 748- 768.
  33. Penzel, T, Moody, GB, Mark, RG, Goldberger, AL, and Peter, JH. 2000. The apnea-ECG database. Pages 255- 258 of: Computers in Cardiology 2000. IEEE.
  34. Power, Daniel J, and Sharda, Ramesh. 2009. Decision support systems. Springer handbook of automation, 1539-1548.
  35. Qian, Yuhua, Liang, Jiye, and Dang, Chuangyin. 2008. Converse approximation and rule extraction from decision tables in rough set theory. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 55(8), 1754-1765.
  36. Quintana, D., Luque, C., and Isasi, P. 2005. Evolutionary rule-based system for IPO underpricing prediction. Pages 983-989 of: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM.
  37. Ripley, Brian D, Whittle, P, Kay, J, Hand, DJ, Tarassenko, L, Brown, PJ, Titterington, DM, Taylor, C, Gilks, WR, Critchey, F, et al., 1994. Neural Networks And Related Methods For Classification. Discussion. Reply. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological, 56(3), 409-456.
  38. Sahoo, R.K., Oliner, A.J., Rish, I., Gupta, M., Moreira, J.E., Ma, S., Vilalta, R., and Sivasubramaniam, A. 2003. Critical event prediction for proactive management in large-scale computer clusters. Pages 426-435 of: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM.
  39. Sethi, Kamal Kumar, Mishra, Durgesh Kumar, and Mishra, Bharat. 2012. Extended Taxonomy of Rule Extraction Techniques and Assessment of KDRuleEx. International Journal of Computer Applications, 50.
  40. Setiono, Rudy, and Liu, Huan. 1997. NeuroLinear: From neural networks to oblique decision rules. Neurocomputing, 17(1), 1-24.
  41. Setiono, Rudy, Baesens, Bart, and Mues, Christophe. 2008. Recursive neural network rule extraction for data with mixed attributes. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, 19(2), 299-307.
  42. Shumway, R.H., and Stoffer, D.S. 2000. Time series analysis and its applications. Springer Verlag.
  43. Taha, Ismail, and Ghosh, Joydeep. 1996. Three techniques for extracting rules from feedforward networks. Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks, 6, 23-28.
  44. Thrun, Sebastian B, Bala, Jerzy W, Bloedorn, Eric, Bratko, Ivan, Cestnik, Bojan, Cheng, John, De Jong, Kenneth A, Dzeroski, Saso, Fisher, Douglas H, Fahlman, Scott E, et al. 1991. The monk's problems: A performance comparison of different learning algorithms.
  45. Towell, Geoffrey G, and Shavlik, Jude W. 1993. Extracting refined rules from knowledge-based neural networks. Machine learning, 13(1), 71-101.
  46. Triantaphyllou, Evangelos, and Felici, Giovanni. 2006. Data mining and knowledge discovery approaches based on rule induction techniques. Vol. 6. Springer.
  47. Tsukimoto, Hiroshi. 2000. Extracting rules from trained neural networks. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, 11(2), 377-389.
  48. Turban, Efraim. 1990. Decision support and expert systems: management support systems. Prentice Hall PTR.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Çeviker M. and Bağlıoğlu Ö. (2014). Rule Generation for Scenario based Decision Support System on Public Finance Domain . In Doctoral Consortium - DC3K, (IC3K 2014) ISBN Not Available, pages 71-82. DOI: 10.5220/0005174000710082


in Bibtex Style

@conference{dc3k14,
author={Mesut Çeviker and Özgür Bağlıoğlu},
title={Rule Generation for Scenario based Decision Support System on Public Finance Domain},
booktitle={Doctoral Consortium - DC3K, (IC3K 2014)},
year={2014},
pages={71-82},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005174000710082},
isbn={Not Available},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Doctoral Consortium - DC3K, (IC3K 2014)
TI - Rule Generation for Scenario based Decision Support System on Public Finance Domain
SN - Not Available
AU - Çeviker M.
AU - Bağlıoğlu Ö.
PY - 2014
SP - 71
EP - 82
DO - 10.5220/0005174000710082