achieved using a descent method, and leads to a lo-
cal minimum dependent on the initialization. Usu-
ally, this step is delegated to the practician (Lu et al.,
2009). Nevertheless, this tedious intervention can
be automated using the geometrical properties of the
left cavity (quasi-conic shape); which can be approx-
imated by a circular shape in a basal short axis (SAX)
slice. Heart motion is also discriminant to initialize
the model (Pednekar et al., 2006).
Using a deformable model requires to design an
energy functional which depends on internal informa-
tion (regularization) and external information (image,
prior). For example, the geodesic model (Caselles
et al., 1997) uses a functional dependent on the image
gradient intensity. The key idea behind edge-based
energy is to force the model to converge on areas
where the gradient intensity is high, i.e where edges
are. The authors also proposed to work on image tex-
ture by integrating region-based energy. The seminal
Chan and Vese method (Chan and Vese, 2001) mini-
mizes inter-class variance on pixels inside/outside the
model. Some generalizations exploit statistics linked
to the physical process of the image formation. For
example, the Weibull model (Ayed et al., 2006) al-
lows to model different distributions which can be
used to finely characterise regions. To solve the non-
stationarity issue induced by region response, Lank-
ton et al. (Lankton and Tannenbaum, 2008) propose a
local region energy. In this method, statistics are eval-
uated along the deformable model. However in real
images, noise and missing data require to incorpo-
rate geometrical constraints in the method, known as
shape-based energy, to solve these issues. This prior
information can be integrated in different ways into
the variational method. For example, Foulounneau
(Foulonneau et al., 2003) uses a mean square process
over Legendre moments between the current model
shape and a reference shape. One of the main interests
of the variational context is its ability to glue different
constraints (edge, region and shape-based). This cou-
pling allows to strengthen the method by merging in-
formation sources. For example the Geodesic Active
Region (GAR) model proposed by Paragios (Paragios
and Deriche, 2002) is one of the first to propose an
edge/region-based energy.
A large number of methods apply these energies
to segment cardiac images. Ultrasound scans (US)
uncovered specific needs for these noisy and poorly
contrasted images. Some authors developed frame-
works to replace gradient-based methods. For in-
stance, some methods use the monogenic signal and
the asymmetry measure (Felsberg and Sommer, 2001;
Kovesi, 1997) to segment cardiac ultrasound images
with an edge-based energy (Rajpoot et al., 2008). In
a region-based context Barbosa et al. (Barbosa et al.,
2013) used Lankton approach with Rayleigh statis-
tics in order to segment US images. The prior knowl-
edge of the heart geometry can be used in a shape-
based energy. This kind of anatomical constraint was
proposed by Paragios (Paragios, 2002) in MRI left
ventricle segmentation by imposing a minimal thick-
ness of the myocardium wall. Finally, Belaid (Belaid
et al., 2011) proposes to merge edge (monogenic sig-
nal) and region-based (Rayleigh distribution) energy
to perform US left ventricle segmentation.
In section 2, we present a general framework to
segment LV in MRI (3D+T)(the framework overall
is presented on figure 1). In this framework a fully
automatic initialization step is performed. Our inten-
tion is to apply the ultrasound approach to MRI by
carving data terms coherent with the underlying im-
age physics. For that, our functional couples region-
based (Weibull model), edge-based (Kovesi asym-
metry measure) and shape-based (myocardium wall
thickness) energy terms. Its particularity is that we
do not use strong prior (spatio-temporal) as in atlas
methods. In section 3, we present some results and
we compare our method with one of the best methods
of the MICCAI 09 challenge.
2 FULLY AUTOMATIC
SEGMENTATION
2.1 Deformable Model Framework
The variational formulation of the segmentation prob-
lem by means of a deformable model is stated as:
S = arg min
S
∗
∈F
S
E(S
∗
) ⇔
δE(S)
δS
= 0 (1)
In our case S corresponds to the final shape of our
model. This shape is taken from a family of solutions
F
S
, by minimizing the energetic functional E. This
optimization problem is solved by means of descent
method on an artificial temporal parameter t. The
model is put into motion, it is a deformable model:
∂S
∂t
= −
δE
δS
= V n (2)
This problem is equivalent to a front propagation
where the variation is homogeneous to a speed V on
the normal n. The calculus of variations on E can be
computed using shape derivative tools (Aubert et al.,
2003). In the level set framework, Sethian (Sethian,
1999) showed that this problem can be stated as:
∂φ
∂t
= V |∇φ|, (3)
VISAPP2015-InternationalConferenceonComputerVisionTheoryandApplications
518