Blended Learning in Multi-disciplinary Classrooms - Experiments in a Lecture about Numerical Analysis

Marcelo Barros, Antao Moura, Laurent Borgman, Uwe Terton

2015

Abstract

Numerical analysis (NA) is a core, compulsory discipline in most scientific, particularly engineering undergraduate programs. Teaching numerical analysis to students with diversified backgrounds and different abilities of learning (visual, aural, read/write kinesthetic learners) is challenging because of its interdisciplinary nature and modelling requirements. Such a challenge in turn, can lead to low success indicators (related to but not limited to student performance) at both whole-class and per-student levels. Negatively affected indicators include subjective (e.g. satisfaction with the subject) and objective ones (e.g. lower overall grade average and absenteeism from class). This paper reports on efforts made at the Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG) in Brazil to favorably change such indicators. The efforts involve applying blended learning (BL) together with gamification procedures to motivate students to engage more deeply in the learning of numerical analysis. As a consequence, it is expected that the other performance indicators will also be positively impacted. Data for a set of success indicators have been collected since 2007 at UFCG. A total of 25 classes encompassing close to 1,500 students and other professionals using the approach in different application domains – including chemical, electrical and civil engineering, environmental studies, security services, health services – have been observed. Collected evidence indicates the BL/gamified procedures improve results over conventional face-to-face only classes. This positive evidence suggests that “soft skills”, typical of social sciences (as opposed to the “hard skills” of numerical calculus) as well as interdisciplinary subjects – particularly those that is crossovers of computer science and design or culture or music – may also benefit from such an approach, particularly in multicultural classrooms.

References

  1. Arano-Ocuaman, J., 2010., Differences in student knowledge and perception of learning experiences among non-traditional students in blended and faceto-face classroom delivery. University of MissouriSaint Louis, USA.
  2. Bersin, J., 2004., The Blended Learning Book: BestPractices, Proven Methodologies, and Lessons Learned. John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Burden, R. and Faires, J., 2010., Numerical Analysis. Cengage Learning, 9th Edition - Mathematics, p. 888.
  4. Campbell, J., 1949., The Hero With a Thousand Faces. Pantheon Books.
  5. Caputo, M. G., 2010. Undergraduate mathematics students' attitudes towards online mathematics education and achievement in a hybrid calculus course. Teachers College., Columbia University.
  6. Castellani, et al., 2013., Game Mechanics in Support of Production Environments. CHI'13, ACM Press.
  7. Cepeda, F.J.D., 2013., A Numerical Methods Course Based on B-Learning: Integrated Learning Design and Follow Up. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 5(1), pp. 39-57.
  8. CSEDU 2011, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Supported Education [online]. [Accessed 15 October 2014]. Available from: http:// pubs.iids.org/index.php/publications/show/1814.
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M., 2014. Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. Springer Science and Business Media Dortrecht, Germany, pp.227.Delwiche, A., 2006. Massively multiplayer online games (MMOs) in the new media classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (3), pp160-172.
  10. Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O'Hara, K., and Dixon, D., 2013., Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Gaming Contexts. CHI'13, ACM Press.
  11. Drysdale, J.S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., and Halverson, L.R., 2013., An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. Internet and Higher Education, 17., pp. 90-100.
  12. Fox, A., 2009., Fun and Games in professional development - Chapter 5 of “Mentoring for 21st Century Skills - Its All about the Learning”, University of Salford, UK.
  13. Galotti, K. M., Clinchy, B. M., Ainsworth, K., Lavin, B., and Manseld, A. F., 1999., A New Way of Assessing Ways of Knowing: The Attitudes Towards Thinking and Learning Survey (ATTLS). Sex Roles, 40(9/10), pp. 745-766.
  14. Garison, D. R., Kanuka, H., 2004. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, pp. 95- 105.
  15. Girard, John P., and Girard, JoAnn L., 2011., Social Knowledge: Using Social Media to Know What You Know. IGI Global, pp. 1-358.
  16. Graham, C. R., 2006., Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions, Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco, CA, pp. 3-21.
  17. Graham, C. R., 2013, Emerging practice and research in blended learning. M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed.), Routledge, New York, pp. 333-350.
  18. Hughes-Hallet, D., Gleason, A. M. et al, 2000, Calculus, Alternate Version. 2nd Ed. [online]. [Accessed 20 October 2014]. Available from: http:// www.math.harvard.edu/knill/pedagogy/harvardcalcul us/index.html.
  19. Kim, J., 2014, What is a Role-Playing Game. [online] [Accessed 26 November 2014]. Available from: http://www.darkshire.net/jhkim/rpg/whatis/.
  20. McConigal, J., 2011., Reality Is Broken. Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. Penguin Press HC.
  21. Mrayyan, S., 2013., The Impact of Blend Methods of Teaching Numerical Analysis on Students Achievement, as Study Case. Greener Journal of Educational Research 3 (3), pp. 155-159.
  22. Miyazoe, T. and Anderson, T. A., 2010, Learning outcomes and students' perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. Systems, 38, (2), pp. 185-199.
  23. Nielsen, J., 2002. User empowerment and the fun factor. In: Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox [online]. [Accessed 15 October 2014]. Available from: http:// www.nngroup.com/articles/user-empowerment-andthe-fun-factor/.
  24. Nuzzo, R., 2014., Scientific method: Statistical errors. Nature 506 (7487): pp. 150.
  25. Saltelli, A. et al., 2008., Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer, John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Thome, F. et al., 2014., How to make Calculus II seem motivated, interesting, and useful. [online]. [Accessed 05 November 2014]. Available from: http://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/24 28/how-to-make-calculus-ii-seem-motivatedinteresting-and-useful.
  27. Uebersax, J., 2006., Likert scales: Dispelling the Confusion. [online]. [Accessed 06 December 2014]. Available from: http://john- uebersax.com/stat/ likert.htm.
  28. USI, 2008., Blended Learning in Numerical Analysis. University dela Svizzera Italiana, [online]. [Accessed 20 October 2014]. Available from: http:// search.usi.ch/people/fbf972d416a9a395e2f8c88656eb 9fdd/Tardini-Stefano/projects.
  29. Werbach, K. & Hunter, D., 2010. For the Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business. Wharton Digital Pres.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Barros M., Moura A., Borgman L. and Terton U. (2015). Blended Learning in Multi-disciplinary Classrooms - Experiments in a Lecture about Numerical Analysis . In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-108-3, pages 196-204. DOI: 10.5220/0005409001960204


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu15,
author={Marcelo Barros and Antao Moura and Laurent Borgman and Uwe Terton},
title={Blended Learning in Multi-disciplinary Classrooms - Experiments in a Lecture about Numerical Analysis},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},
year={2015},
pages={196-204},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005409001960204},
isbn={978-989-758-108-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
TI - Blended Learning in Multi-disciplinary Classrooms - Experiments in a Lecture about Numerical Analysis
SN - 978-989-758-108-3
AU - Barros M.
AU - Moura A.
AU - Borgman L.
AU - Terton U.
PY - 2015
SP - 196
EP - 204
DO - 10.5220/0005409001960204