InterLect - Lecture Content Interface

Robin Nicolay, Bastian Schwennigcke, Jonas Vetterick, Wolfgang Sucharowski, Clemens H. Cap

2015

Abstract

Large audiences complicate interactions between lecturer and individual students. Because students differ in their individual qualities, all of them have their own individual needs and challenges - at different topics and at different points in time. We reviewed current academic teaching processes in their way of presenting and consuming lecture material. Based on our findings, we implemented InterLect to observe students’ perception of lecture material and to examine their conflicts and needs during the lecture. These needs help us to improve the awareness on comprehension and determination of appropriate learning activities, so students are able to increase their benefit from the teaching content.

References

  1. Adobe Systems (2014). PDF-Reader, PDF-Viewer Adobe Reader XI: http://perma.cc/N5NZ-VCGN.
  2. Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1):57-75.
  3. Dunn, P. K., Richardson, A., Oprescu, F., and McDonald, C. (2013). Mobile-phone-based classroom response systems: Students perceptions of engagement and learning in a large undergraduate course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(8):1160-1174.
  4. Feiten, L., Buehrer, M., Sester, S., and Becker, B. (2012). Smile-smartphones in lectures-initiating a smartphone-based audience response system as a student project. In CSEDU (1), pages 288-293.
  5. Gal, A. (2011). PDF.js: http://perma.cc/HWN7-UELE.
  6. Hannafin, M. J., Hill, J. R., Land, S. M., and Lee, E. (2014). Student-centered, open learning environments: Research, theory, and practice. In Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., and Bishop, M. J., editors, Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, pages 641-651. Springer, New York, Heidelberg.
  7. Hickson, I. and WHATWG (2014). w3.org - The canvas element HTML5: http://perma.cc/3PJX-T8HH.
  8. Jenkins, A. (2007). Technique and technology: Electronic voting systems in an english literature lecture. Pedagogy, 7(3):526-533.
  9. Kay, R. H. and LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3):819-827.
  10. Kundisch, D., Sievers, M., Zoyke, A., Herrmann, P., Whittaker, M., Beutner, M., Fels, G., and Magenheim, J. (2012). Designing a web-based application to support peer instruction for very large groups. International Conference on Information Systems 2012.
  11. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
  12. Laurillard, D. (2008). Digital technologies and their role in achieving our ambitions for education.
  13. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. Routledge, New York.
  14. Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., and Grabowski, B. L. (2008). Generative learning: Principles and implications for making meaning. In Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., and Driscoll, M. P., editors, Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, pages 111-124. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York.
  15. Leutner, D. and Schmeck, A. (2014). The generative drawing principle in multimedia learning. In Mayer, R. E., editor, The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pages 433-448. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  16. Lucariello, J. (2015). How do i get my students over their alternative conceptions (misconceptions) for learning? http://perma.cc/wbk2-dd76.
  17. Marius, L., Moore, G., and Moore, G. (2008). ISO 13250-2: Topic Maps - Data Model: http://perma.cc/MPT4- MVLM.
  18. Microsoft (2014). Slide Presentation Software - Microsoft PowerPoint: http://perma.cc/8ABA-P3Z5: Make your point.
  19. Mioduser, D. (2015). The pedagogical ecology of technology education: An agenda for future research and development. In Williams, P. J., Jones, A., and Buntting, C., editors, The future of technology education, Contemporary Issues in Technology Education, pages 77-98. Springer, Singapore.
  20. Nicolay, R. (2014). Semantic Enhancement of Lecture Material: arXiv:1412.2901 [cs.CY].
  21. Otto, M. (2011). Bootstrap - The world's most popular mobile-first and responsive front-end framework: http://perma.cc/99TT-BFL6.
  22. Popova, A., Kirschner, P. A., and Joiner, R. (2014). Effects of primer podcasts on stimulating learning from lectures: How do students engage? British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2):330-339.
  23. Tobias, S. (2010). Generative learning theory, paradigm shifts, and constructivism in educational psychology: A tribute to merl wittrock. Educational Psychologist, 45(1):51-55.
  24. van Merriënboer, J. J. G. and Kester, L. (2014). The fourcomponent instructional design model: Multimedia principles in environments for complex learning. In Mayer, R. E., editor, The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pages 71-96. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  25. Vetterick, J., Garbe, M., and Cap, C. H. (2013). Tweedback: A live feedback system for large audiences. In 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU2013).
  26. Vetterick, J., Schwennigcke, B., Langfeld, A., Cap, C. H., and Sucharowski, W. (2014). Making Classroom Response Systems More Social. In 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, pages 153-161.
  27. Wiliams, E., Glass, N., Dorsey, J., and Biz, S. (2006). Welcome to Twitter: http://perma.cc/F2CV-BGZD.
  28. Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24:345-376.
  29. Wittrock, M. C. (1992). Generative learning processes of the brain. Educational Psychologist, 27(4):531-541.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Nicolay R., Schwennigcke B., Vetterick J., Sucharowski W. and H. Cap C. (2015). InterLect - Lecture Content Interface . In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-107-6, pages 269-276. DOI: 10.5220/0005440102690276


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu15,
author={Robin Nicolay and Bastian Schwennigcke and Jonas Vetterick and Wolfgang Sucharowski and Clemens H. Cap},
title={InterLect - Lecture Content Interface},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},
year={2015},
pages={269-276},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005440102690276},
isbn={978-989-758-107-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - InterLect - Lecture Content Interface
SN - 978-989-758-107-6
AU - Nicolay R.
AU - Schwennigcke B.
AU - Vetterick J.
AU - Sucharowski W.
AU - H. Cap C.
PY - 2015
SP - 269
EP - 276
DO - 10.5220/0005440102690276