Social Business Process Management Approaches - A Comparative Study

Hadjer Khider, Amel Benna

2015

Abstract

The rapid development of web 2.0 has led fundamental changes and has offered huge opportunities in the way the business process models are made available to individuals and organizations. Indeed, in order to enhance their traditional Business Process Management (BPM), organizations are looking increasingly to use these web 2.0 technologies. The social software easiness of use and their distinct features (weak ties, implicit knowledge, knowledge sharing, etc.) has recently led the emergence of the social BPM approaches. In this paper, we discuss the interaction of social software with BPMand provide a comparative study between social business process approaches for each business process life cycle phase; we then propose how, in each phase of a business process life cycle, a BPM can capitalize on social software.

References

  1. Brambilla, M., Fraternali, P., and Ruiz, C. K. V. (2012). Combining social web and BPM for improving enterprise performances: the bpm4people approach to social. In Proceedings of the 21st World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2012, Lyon, France, April 16-20, pages 223-226.
  2. Brambilla, M., Fraternali, P., and Vaca, C. (2011). A notation for supporting social business process modeling. In Business Process Model and Notation - Third International Workshop, BPMN, Switzerland, November 21-22, volume 95 of Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, pages 88-102. Springer.
  3. Graupner, S., Bartolini, C., Nezhad, H. R. M., and Erbes, J. (2012). Evolving social media into productivity platforms. In 2012 Annual SRII Global Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, July 24-27, 2012, pages 183-190.
  4. Koschmider, A., Song, M., and Reijers, H. A., editors (2009). Social software for modeling business processes, Berlin Heidelberg. Springer.
  5. Qu, H., Sun, J., and Jamjoom, H. (2008). SCOOP: automated social recommendation in enterprise process management. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing 2008), 8-11 July 2008, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, pages 101-108. IEEE Computer Society.
  6. Rangiha, M. and Karakostas, B. (2013). Goal-driven social business process management.science and information conference. pages 894-901. IEEE.
  7. Schmidt, R. and Nurcan, S. (2008). BPM and social software. In Business Process Management Workshops, BPM 2008 International Workshops, Milano, Italy, September 1-4, 2008. Revised Papers, pages 649-658.
  8. Weske, M. (2007). Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, USA, 2nd edition.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Khider H. and Benna A. (2015). Social Business Process Management Approaches - A Comparative Study . In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-098-7, pages 340-345. DOI: 10.5220/0005465103400345


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis15,
author={Hadjer Khider and Amel Benna},
title={Social Business Process Management Approaches - A Comparative Study},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2015},
pages={340-345},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005465103400345},
isbn={978-989-758-098-7},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - Social Business Process Management Approaches - A Comparative Study
SN - 978-989-758-098-7
AU - Khider H.
AU - Benna A.
PY - 2015
SP - 340
EP - 345
DO - 10.5220/0005465103400345